Evening Standard

YOU WON’T HAVE TO WEAR A MASK IN OFFICE

THEY DON’T PROTECT IN SAME WAY AS THEY DO IN SHOPS AND ON TUBE, SAYS HANCOCK

- Joe Murphy, Nicholas Cecil and Jonathan Prynn

MATT HANCOCK today ruled out making office workers wear face masks because they do not “make much difference” in combating coronaviru­s in such settings.

“We will not be recommendi­ng masks in the office,” the Health Secretary, right, said, arguing that they were appropriat­e only in settings such as trains and shops where strangers mix in close proximity.

However, the British Medical Associatio­n said masks should be worn in any office where two-metre social distancing or other mitigation is not possible, and a business expert said masks in offices could help give people more confidence to go back to work. Dr Chaand Nagpaul, BMA council chairman and a north London GP, said: “The BMA believes that face coverings should be worn whenever physical distancing is not possible to prevent spread of infection — this includes situations in the workplace in which people cannot keep two metres apart, unless other mitigating action is taken, for example the installati­on of effective plastic screens.”

Jonathan Ratcliffe, senior

broker at serviced office provider Offices.co.uk, said: “Making face masks compulsory in all common areas of offices and workspaces would increase employee confidence and help convince staff it is safe to return to our cities and get back to work.

“We desperatel­y need everyone back at work, and the confusion about whether it’s safe or not is not helpful at all. Including compulsory face masks in offices and workplaces sends a strong message that this is the new normal, and we need everyone back in the cities — even if they are wearing masks.”

Josh Hardie, deputy director-general of the Confederat­ion of British Industry, said: “Firms will do all they can and continued transparen­cy on the health evidence will drive behaviour change.”

But City commentato­r David Buik, of London-based trading platform Aquis Exchange, said: “It’s a totally useless idea. I respect the need to wear masks when you go into a shop but the thought of everyone having to wear a mask all day in an office is ludicrous. It’s not going to happen.”

Mr Hancock said that face coverings will have to be worn “for the foreseeabl­e future” in shops and public transport. He did not rule out making people wear them until a vaccine is available, possibly next year.

He told BBC Breakfast: “The virus exists only to multiply and without any measures we know that each person infects another two to three people so we do have to have these measures in place.”

The Health Secretary said office workers could remove masks because they tended to spend their days with the same group of people. “When you are in close proximity with somebody who you have to work closely to then if you are there for a long time with them then a mask does not offer that protection,” he said. “It’s something that we have looked at and rejected on exactly the grounds that I have just set out. What you need in offices is social distancing, you need to be two metres apart or have other mitigation­s to make a work place Covid secure.” The opposite was true of people working in shops or public transport, he said. “Where the mask benefits is … when you have relatively short interactio­ns with lots of different

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Covering up: Londoners wearing masks on the capital’s streets today. But the Government said workers would not have to wear masks in offices — bad news for City agent Chris
Vydra, above, who has had the Bank junction skyline printed on his
Covering up: Londoners wearing masks on the capital’s streets today. But the Government said workers would not have to wear masks in offices — bad news for City agent Chris Vydra, above, who has had the Bank junction skyline printed on his

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom