Evening Standard

WORK FROM HOME ADVICE AXED BY PM

IT’S SCRAPPED FROM AUG 1 BUT BORIS UNVEILS TOUGHEST POWERS YET FOR LOCAL LOCKDOWNS

- Joe Murphy Political Editor

BORIS JOHNSON sought to revive the economy today by scrapping official guidance to “work from home if you can” from August 1.

The Prime Minister responded to fears that cities including London are being hollowed out by coronaviru­s by giving more discretion to firms to ask staff to come in, as long as they do so in a safe and “socially responsibl­e” way.

At a press conference, he unveiled the toughest lockdown powers yet, allowing ministers to seal off communitie­s and order people to “stay at home”.

Mr Johnson acknowledg­ed the draconian measures will be “hard going” for people caught up in them.

From August, employers will be able to discuss with staff proposals for them to return to offices and workplaces that have been made safe against Covid-19.

The Government is asking employers to behave in a socially responsibl­e manner and listen to the concerns of staff who have problems accessing public transport, have special health worries, or are constraine­d by looking after children.

The guidance will give employers more discretion to decide whether employees should come into work or stay at home. “We are not prescribin­g what businesses should do,” said a government source. Meanwhile, new powers

to deal with Leicester-style local outbreaks of Covid-19 will be available to local authoritie­s from tomorrow, while the most extreme powers will be set out in draft to Parliament next week. They include:

⬤ Local stay-at-home orders that will bar people from entering or leaving defined areas without permission.

⬤ Powers to shut down or restrict transport systems, effectivel­y cutting off a town or area where there is an outbreak.

⬤ Special measures to cancel events or shut down individual businesses and venues.

⬤ Means to limit gatherings more severely than national rules.

The measures go beyond the extended lockdown being experience­d by Leicester, which was imposed after a wave of cases in the city’s crowded centre. They will be subject to appeal routes and oversight to guard against misuse, but Mr Johnson was clear that they are necessary.

The Prime Minister said: “I know that it will be hard going for people affected by these local measures. It isn’t easy, and for some it may seem unjust that people just a short distance away can live their lives closer to normal.

“But it has to be right that we take local action in response to local outbreaks — there is no point shutting down Newcastle to contain an outbreak in Bristol.”

A huge increase in testing for the disease will be rolled out, with up to half a million tests a day being considered. Squads of health officials and tracers will be at readiness to swoop if a town or borough shows signs of getting out of control.

Downing Street says there is no new example of a Leicester-style outbreak at the moment. The powers are being taken now in preparatio­n for the future, especially this winter, amid rising concerns that coronaviru­s will be a long-lasting problem.

Local authoritie­s will have the powers to close premises and outdoor spaces from tomorrow. If councils refuse to take action, ministers will have the power to intervene and take over the local response.

Mr Johnson said: “These powers will enable local authoritie­s to act more quickly in response to outbreaks, where speed is paramount.

“Action by local councils will not always be sufficient. So next week we will publish regulation­s enabling central government to intervene more effectivel­y at a local level.

“Where justified by the evidence, ministers will be able to close businesses and venues, introduce local stay-at-home orders, prevent people entering or leaving defined areas, limit the size of gatherings beyond national

rules, and restrict transport systems serving local areas.”

Mr Johnson is also set to give details of his new back-to-work message, following criticism from MPs of the current official guidance that says “work from home if you can”.

Security minister James Brokenshir­e stopped well short of urging people to stop working from home during interviews this morning.

“We will continue to be informed by the advice we get from Sage, from Sir Patrick Vallance,” he said on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. Sir Patrick, the chief scientific adviser, said yesterday there was no reason to stop working from home. Asked if the advice was “go back to work” or “stay at home if you can”, Mr Brokenshir­e said: “Ultimately, it’s for the employers to make those decisions based on their individual businesses. That’s what we support while encouragin­g people where we can get people back to do so.”

The NHS in England will get an extra £3 billion of funding to prepare for a possible second wave of coronaviru­s. The funding will also help ease winter pressures on the NHS, Downing Street said. It follows warnings that a second wave in winter could see about 120,000 Covid-19 deaths in UK hospitals.

⬤ Nearly one in 10 adults in Britain visited a hair salon or barber in the week starting July 1, according to the Office for National Statistics. A further 10 per cent ate or drank in a restaurant, café, bar or pub.

SOLDIERS know it. Doctors know it. Firefighte­rs know it. Without clear rules — and a firm idea of just what will happen if you break them — you cannot navigate an emergency. But the Government seems yet to grasp this concept when it comes to coronaviru­s. Things started well: “Stay at home” is after all a difficult instructio­n to misinterpr­et, which is why most people followed it. But since then, messaging has only become more muddled. Almost every issue — from wearing masks, to visiting elderly grandparen­ts, to whether you should drive long distances just to test your eyes — has been surrounded with ambiguity.

This week it was the question of whether people should head back to work that has been causing maximum confusion. All week the Government has been tight-lipped on whether it will formally scrap its guidance to work from home and avoid public transport where possible. Statements from the chief scientific adviser appeared to contradict hints from the Prime Minister. Businesses, meanwhile, were left in the dark.

The question was finally settled today with Boris Johnson’s announceme­nt that the guidance would indeed be scrapped. Yet the message was still less than clear: it will be left to employers to decide whether workers return. And delivered alongside the “back to work” edict was a seemingly contradict­ory one: that there will be draconian new measures to enforce the rules. Local authoritie­s will have new powers to shut down events. Ministers will be able to introduce stay-at-home orders. Are we opening up or shutting down?

Of course as the nation eases out of lockdown the rules will need to change. It makes sense to open up the country as much as possible, while cracking down on the kind of behaviour most likely to spread the virus. But that makes it all the more vital that the Government learns to communicat­e its own rules more effectivel­y. A poll reveals today that 34 per cent of Londoners say clearer government messaging about safety would make a big difference. A weekly passenger survey finds almost half say they don’t feel safe using public transport. This is an unknown and terrifying new virus — it is not enough to trust that workers and employers will use their common sense. Frightened people need guidance. Without it, an emergency quickly becomes a crisis.

This is a terrifying new virus — workers and employers need clear rules

 ??  ?? New measures: commuters wearing facemasks on the Tube and, right, at Victoria station today, as the Prime Minister unveiled the toughest range of coronaviru­s lockdown powers yet
New measures: commuters wearing facemasks on the Tube and, right, at Victoria station today, as the Prime Minister unveiled the toughest range of coronaviru­s lockdown powers yet
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom