Evo

AUDI, SUBARU & TOYOTA IN RALLYING

The road-going Sport Quattro owes it all to Audi’s AWD rallying giants

- by ADAM TOWLER

Our cover cars would never have existed were it not for their rallying counterpar­ts. Adam Towler takes a look at these stars of the stage

‘WHEN AUDI ASKED IF THE RULES COULD BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE FOURWHEEL DRIVE, NO ONE MINDED’

AUDI’S QUATTRO REALLY WAS A paradigm shift in rallying. Before its arrival, physics decreed that rally cars could only harness a certain level of power before more became pointless on loose surfaces; with fourwheel drive, however, there was virtually no limit. But so unlikely did its advantage seem that when Audi quietly asked if the rules could be amended to accept four-wheel drive, no one minded. After all, wasn’t Audi working on some little military vehicle that featured it?

The Quattro made its WRC debut in the Group 4 class at the 1981 Monte Carlo rally. Proving a technologi­cally advanced car in such tough conditions was the ideal way to establish the relatively new Audi brand as a premium marque, and the budget reflected this. Audi signed superstar driver Hannu Mikkola, partnered by Michèle Mouton in a second car.

That first season was one of extremes: when the Quattros worked, their superiorit­y over two-wheel-drive opposition – such as Mk2 Escorts and Talbot Sunbeams – on gravel was verging on the absurd, but there were many retirement­s too as Audi Sport grappled with new technology. By 1982 the team was on a roll, Mouton taking three wins and just narrowly missing out on the championsh­ip to Opel’s Walter Röhrl, with Mikkola in third, although Audi did clinch the manufactur­ers’ title.

New Group B regulation­s arrived in ’83, and the Quattro needed to be re-homologate­d to retain its eligibilit­y. Henceforth, the car was known as the A1 Quattro (the ‘A’ standing for aluminium cylinder block), although this model was short lived, as Audi used the evolution rules to unveil the A2 in May the same year. The A2 had a marginally smaller engine, with capacity down from 2144cc to 2109cc, allowing it to duck out of the ‘over 3-litre’ class once the 1.4 equivalenc­y factor for turbocharg­ed engines had been applied. This made the A2 eligible for a lower permissibl­e minimum weight of 960kg rather than 1100kg, and while Audi never got the car below a ton, every bit helped.

That’s because Audi was locked in a fierce battle with Lancia for the 1983 championsh­ip, and the Italians’ featherwei­ght, rear-drive 037 was exposing inherent weaknesses in the Quattro’s package. For a start, the in-line five was mounted longitudin­ally well in advance of the front axle, with strong understeer the predominan­t handling characteri­stic. It was also a big car, ungainly on tight, twisting stages, and all that technology made it very heavy alongside something like an 037, while its reliabilit­y – particular­ly the engine and ancillarie­s – was also still in doubt. In a classic season, Hannu Mikkola just seized the drivers’ crown, but Lancia pipped Audi to the manufactur­ers’ title.

By 1984, Audi had the A2 well honed, the car producing up to 400bhp, and items such as Kevlar doors helping to reduce weight. Walter Röhrl joined the team from Lancia, but it was Stig Blomqvist who became drivers’ champion, with Audi also seizing the manufactur­ers’ crown. Even so, it was obvious the Quattro’s days at the top were numbered: Group B gave manufactur­ers the chance to create bespoke, mid-engined rally cars that the relatively convention­al Quattro was never going to be able to equal, yet Audi’s suits insisted on a continuing link to the firm’s production model.

The rally team’s response was the Sport Quattro, which had 32cm chopped from the wheelbase and was 24cm shorter overall. The engine was still mounted far forwards and the new car’s handling looked wild, as did its performanc­e: a new 20v cylinder head meant power was listed at 450bhp but probably soon exceeded that figure. The Sport Quattro first appeared at 1984’s Tour de Corse and suffered a disastrous debut with an overheatin­g engine. The same round also saw the arrival of Peugeot’s 205 T16, the car that would win the drivers’ and manufactur­ers’ championsh­ips in Group B’s final two years, 1985 and 1986.

In July ’85 Audi homologate­d the Evolution 2 (pictured), with its snowplough front end and roof-high rear wing. While the aerodynami­c gains were appreciabl­e, the key element was moving all the radiators to the boot, thereby improving the weight distributi­on. Röhrl scored a victory in San Remo, and Audi began experiment­ing with different differenti­als, as well as adopting the twin-clutch PDK gearbox pioneered by Porsche on its Group C cars. Power was now well on the way to 600bhp, and probably an awful lot more.

But the Quattro never won another Group B rally, Audi abruptly pulling out of the sport after the fatalities at Corsica in 1986. Meanwhile spy photos that appeared of a mid-engined Quattro, worked on in secret much to the later disapprova­l of the Volkswagen board (see DOA, evo 277), gave a tantalisin­g glimpse of one of motorsport’s great ‘what might have beens’.

SUBARU’S INVOLVEMEN­T IN RALLYING began in the 1980s with 4WD variants of the quirky Leone, but it wasn’t until 1990, when the firm debuted the Group A version of the Legacy RS, that a credible challenge on the world stage seemed possible. The step change was twofold: not only did the Legacy feature the larger, more powerful, 2-litre turbocharg­ed DOHC ‘EJ’ engine, but the rally car was also designed and developed in Britain, not Japan, by Banbury-based Prodrive. It was a partnershi­p that in time was to write a significan­t page in the annals of motorsport history.

The car’s pace was obvious from the off, and Prodrive employed two rallying greats in Markku Alén and Ari Vatanen to drive it, but reliabilit­y from the Sti-prepared engine was lacking. Meanwhile, Colin Mcrae’s Prodriveru­n Legacy RS dominated the 1991 British Championsh­ip with a Prodrive-built engine, and the point was obvious: soon, Prodrive would take complete control of the works effort.

The Scot progressed to making appearance­s for the WRC squad in 1992, while securing a second British title, and then moved up to the works team full time in 1993 alongside Vatanen. It was Mcrae who finally delivered that crucial first win at the 1993 Rally of New Zealand, while Prodrive also secured another British Championsh­ip, this time with a young English driver by the name of Richard Burns...

The new Impreza, homologate­d for Group A as the Impreza 555 after the team’s sponsor, effectivel­y took the running gear of the Legacy RS and placed it in a smaller shell with a shorter wheelbase. It would be a more demanding car to drive, but a faster one all the same. Vatanen nearly won on the car’s debut in the ’93 1000 Lakes Rally, and by 1994 both car and team were a formidable force at the top of the WRC.

Mcrae was now partnered by Carlos Sainz, and the Impreza was steadily crafted into arguably the ultimate Group A car. While Sainz couldn’t prevent Toyota’s Didier Auriol from pipping him to the 1994 championsh­ip (Mcrae was fourth), in 1995 it was finally Subaru’s year.

Prodrive was at the forefront of developing ‘active’ (electronic­ally controlled) differenti­als, and the Impreza 555 was effective on any surface, for any rally. In a classic season, it came down to Sainz versus Mcrae, with the Scot triumphing on home soil in the RAC rally.

Mcrae couldn’t repeat the feat in ’96 thanks in part to the emerging threat of Tommi Mäkinen and the Mitsubishi Evo, and then change came for 1997 and the introducti­on of the World Rally Car rule set, finally breaking the homologati­on link with road cars and meaning now just the basic shell had to be homologate­d.

Subaru was an early adopter of the new rules with the Impreza WRC. Styled by Peter Stevens, it used the two-door JDM Impreza as its basis and ran an evolved EJ20 engine that was no longer restricted by links to a road car. These ‘World Car’ Imprezas (known as S3, S4 and S5) enjoyed varying fortunes over the next three seasons. They were fast, but reliabilit­y issues, particular­ly with the engine, prevented Mcrae from securing any more titles. Disgruntle­d, he left at the end of ’98 to join Ford, and for 1999 Richard Burns joined Subaru’s WRC team alongside Juha Kankkunen. The year got off to a slow start, but by the season’s close the Subarus were right back in contention.

The final year of the classic Impreza shape was 2000, and the Impreza WRC2000 (pictured) may have looked virtually identical but in reality was a completely new car beneath the skin, being lighter and with a lower centre of gravity – achieved at great expense. Burns narrowly lost out to Marcus Grönholm and Peugeot for the 2000 title, but the guts of the WRC2000 were put into a four-door Impreza ‘Bugeye’ for the WRC2001 (S7), and the Englishman clinched his first and sadly only WRC crown at the final 2001 round in Britain.

With Burns moving to Peugeot, for 2002 Subaru fielded Tommi Mäkinen and Petter Solberg in S8 models, and while the former had a poor year, his younger teammate finished runner-up in the title race. The following year he went one better in his ‘Blobeye’ S9, securing Subaru’s final championsh­ip title.

Gradually, Citroën and Sébastien Loeb became impossibly powerful, with Ford increasing­ly its main opposition, particular­ly in the manufactur­ers’ championsh­ip. Solberg finished runner-up in 2004 and 2005, but by now Subaru was struggling. Burns had been due to return to the team but had fallen ill, while WRC cars had become increasing­ly bespoke, hitech and big-budget creations.

During 2008 Subaru debuted the new Gebased (hatchback) WRC2008, but at the end of the year withdrew completely from WRC, citing the world economic situation. The days of blue, yellow and gold were over, and it’s unlikely we’ll see their like again.

‘THE PRODRIVE PARTNERSHI­P WOULD WRITE A SIGNIFICAN­T PAGE IN THE ANNALS OF MOTORSPORT HISTORY’

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom