Evo

AQUAPLANIN­G

-

ON THE WET HANDLING CIRCUIT there was a sense that the Michelin was less able to maintain grip in the faster corners, so it’s no surprise that it finished third in the lateral aquaplanin­g test, which averages the residual lateral accelerati­on measured at a number of speeds between 60 and 90kph (37-56mph) in 5mm of water. The surprise is that the Continenta­l is only fractional­ly better than the Michelin.

The standout performanc­e came from the Bridgeston­e, which made it an aquaplanin­g clean sweep. It recorded the strongest resistance to longitudin­al aquaplanin­g too, though by a lesser margin, this test conducted in 9mm of water and measuring the speed the tyre can attain before it over-speeds by 15 per cent. As in the curved test, Continenta­l was second and Michelin third.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom