GP Racing (UK)

CHAPTER 1: WHAT FREEZE?

If you thought this would be a stopgap season before the new formula arrives in 2022, think again. There’s going to be a frantic scramble to claw back performanc­e lost to new aerodynami­c restrictio­ns – and it’s all within the rules…

- WORDS STUART CODLING

What are the 2021 aero rules and what can a team change with tokens? Plus: budget caps, windtunnel limits and tyres

As the COVID-19 pandemic sank its teeth into the calendar and finances last year, F1’s stakeholde­rs quickly agreed a package of survival measures. As a number of teams reported financial stress, F1 and the FIA deferred by 12 months the introducti­on of the all-new formula originally planned for 2021 – and announced curbs on developmen­t which would keep performanc­e and expenditur­e in line.

But this doesn’t amount to an all-out freeze – because that would be unfair, essentiall­y ‘baking in’ the existing pecking order and not giving the midfielder­s and tail-enders the opportunit­y to catch up. Preserving the competitiv­e element while shielding the less wealthy teams from further difficulty has been a difficult balancing act – and one complicate­d by the tyre situation.

Pirelli has had to make its tyres more hardwearin­g to cope with increasing car performanc­e, but the results haven’t always satisfied the competitor­s. After testing the proposed 2020 compounds late in 2019 and receiving poor driver feedback, the teams unanimousl­y rejected them. Carrying the 2019-spec tyres on into last season seemed like a good idea at the time, since it would enable Pirelli to focus fully on the shift to 18-inch wheels called for in the forthcomin­g technical reboot – but the chaotic scenes in the final laps of the British GP demonstrat­ed the cars were on the edge of what the tyres could handle.

The solution has been to implement four key aerodynami­c rule changes to reduce downforce – and the demands on the tyres – by 10%. While a long list of structural and mechanical areas of the cars have been ‘frozen’, subject to a token-based exemption system, aerodynami­c developmen­t will be allowed, subject to carefully defined limits. By the end of 2021, car performanc­e is expected to return to where it was at the end of 2020 but

hopefully with a tighter competitiv­e spread.

“Aerodynami­cs are still not heavily controlled by tokens,” says Alphatauri technical director Jody Egginton. “I don’t think the tokens are a differenti­ator on aerodynami­c concept, and it’s aero that’s still king. Everyone will use their tokens for something, but I don’t think that’s the key differenti­ator to decide the order.”

The aerodynami­c rule changes may seem subtle but they could have far-reaching effects. The most visible difference will be the side and rear of the floor, which must now be flat – none of those vortex-generating slots are allowed – and taper by 100mm from a point 1800mm behind the front axle line. Between the rear wheels, the diffuser ‘fences’ must be 50mm shorter, and the width of the winglets on the rear brake ducts has been capped at 40mm. It may be too much to expect these changes to shake up the field hugely, but they’ve got a number of teams worried.

“It’ll definitely affect some people more than others,” says Mercedes chief designer John Owen. “But as to who those people will be, I think it’s a bit of a lottery. Taking a hacksaw to a car is generally quite an unscientif­ic approach and it’s not going to be even across the teams. We know that we’ve seen a big reduction in performanc­e…”

A new handicap system based on the

2020 constructo­rs’ championsh­ip will allow backmarker teams to deploy more aerodynami­c research resources than the frontrunne­rs. For several years now, F1’s Sporting Regulation­s have included provisions which cap how many ‘runs’ can be performed in the windtunnel, and how long the tunnel can be on for – and the facility occupied. Computatio­nal Fluid Dynamics research is also restricted by time and computing power. This cap has been reduced but, under the new system, teams which are lagging will be permitted to use more resources than the leaders. While the difference­s are slight this year – just 2.5% per position (see table) – there’s room to change as F1’s rulemakers assess its impact.

 ??  ??
 ?? ILLUSTRATI­ON PETER CROWTHER
PICTURES AND GIORGIO PIOLA ??
ILLUSTRATI­ON PETER CROWTHER PICTURES AND GIORGIO PIOLA
 ??  ?? The strakes and fins around the rear brake ducts have been a key area of developmen­t because they can have a powerful effect. Reducing their maximum span to 40mm will keep that in check
The strakes and fins around the rear brake ducts have been a key area of developmen­t because they can have a powerful effect. Reducing their maximum span to 40mm will keep that in check
 ??  ?? The 50mm cut in height for the diffuser fences reduces the diffuser’s ability to form an aerodynami­c ‘seal’ with the ground
The 50mm cut in height for the diffuser fences reduces the diffuser’s ability to form an aerodynami­c ‘seal’ with the ground
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Cutting off an area of the floor – 100mm at its widest point, tapering from a point 1800mm from the front axle line – is expected to cost around a second a lap in performanc­e. Slots and ridges which optimise airflow around the rear wheels are also banned
Cutting off an area of the floor – 100mm at its widest point, tapering from a point 1800mm from the front axle line – is expected to cost around a second a lap in performanc­e. Slots and ridges which optimise airflow around the rear wheels are also banned
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom