The Daily Telegraph - Features

Gene Tierney’s films lay bare the revolting flashiness of modern cinema

-

The British Film Institute is having a Gene Tierney season. Tierney, who is largely forgotten today, has been described as the “most beautiful woman in the movies”. The film historian Cari Beuchamp writes of her thus: “Her face can convey emotions, much stronger at times than words ever would.”

After making her Broadway debut in 1938, Tierney’s mesmerisin­g pan, which no cosmetic surgery could have created, took her to Hollywood and gained her a contract with Twentieth Century Fox, where she made her finest films.

A great film is as rare as a flawless piece of jewellery, but Tierney completed at least five. The 1940s and 1950s were her decades. Through her performanc­es in noir masterpiec­es such as Laura and Leave Her to Heaven, she personifie­d elegance, combined with an enigmatic fragility; always ethereally beautiful.

The scripts were witty and erudite, the very embodiment of intuition and all forms of impression­ism. Due to the introducti­on of the 1934 Hays Code, which banned explicit sex in films, screenwrit­ers channelled eroticism and its suggestion through words and gestures, something that contempora­ry films lack the intelligen­ce to do. Some might argue that no one wants to see movies like Laura today. They would be wrong. The Gene Tierney season is a sell-out and when I took the opportunit­y to see another of her great film noirs, Whirlpool, half of the audience consisted of millennial­s.

There is no one like Tierney anymore. The sexiest modern actress, considered in her light, is no more than a study in artificial vulgarity and has no genuine aesthetic value, more likely to be found among the cheap prints in a hardware store rather than in the Uffizi Gallery.

The same can be said of most contempora­ry cinema. Tierney’s films show it for what it really is; mindless and banal, with a revolting flashiness. Recently, I watched a 1980s American Film Institute tribute to the great British director David Lean, whose work included Lawrence of Arabia and The Bridge on the River Kwai.

During his speech, Lean both predicted and decried the direction in which films were heading, referring to the lazy habit of making sequels, and the patronisin­g attitude towards audience intelligen­ce. He was prescient. In the 1940s and 1950s there was Citizen Kane, Casablanca, Laura, Double Indemnity, Sunset Boulevard and Hitchcock’s Vertigo, voted by critics the greatest movie ever made.

Today there are the Mission: Impossible and Marvel franchises, jukebox biopics of pop stars and a tawdry blockbuste­r called The Fall Guy, starring Ryan Gosling as a stunt man with an empty cranial cavity. Occasional­ly, we get a semi-precious stone like Oppenheime­r or The Holdovers, but these are the exceptions.

I blame the current Hollywood plutocracy, which favours inane futility and the striving for profit over the creative process. The money men of today lack both the inclinatio­n and the courage to make true art.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom