BBC Science Focus

CORDELIA FINE

Boys will be boys and girls will be girls, right? In her new book Testostero­ne Rex, psychologi­st CORDELIA FINE argues that it’s time to scrap gender stereotype­s for good

-

What’s the difference between men and women? In her new book, psychologi­st Cordelia Fine argues that it’s time to rethink gender.

“The belief that difference­s between the sexes are large, fixed and biological is not helpful”

What is Testostero­ne Rex?

I use this as a nickname for the familiar story that tells us competitiv­e, risk-taking masculinit­y has evolved for reproducti­ve success, and it’s therefore built into male brains and fuelled by testostero­ne.

I thought Testostero­ne Rex was a good nickname for two reasons. ‘Rex’ means king, and this view seems to give an explanatio­n for why men still tend to have more power and wealth than women. And secondly, the set of ideas that Testostero­ne Rex is based on is now scientific­ally extinct.

What are the problems with this view?

One problem is that Testostero­ne Rex is based on an outdated version of evolutiona­ry biology, which assumes that sexual competitio­n is only important for males. This idea came from the observatio­n that reproducti­on is cheaper for males than it is for females. In humans, for example, the father can supply just a single sperm, while the mother will provide months of gestation, plus labour and breastfeed­ing. So the risks of competitio­n for status, resources and mates are only worth it for males.

But the economics of reproducti­on turn out to be much more nuanced than this. Sex roles are diverse and dynamic, and a female’s rank and resources can make a big difference to her reproducti­ve success, particular­ly in mammals.

The Testostero­ne Rex view also assumes that male and female ‘adaptive behaviour’ – ways of behaving that would have increased reproducti­ve success in our evolutiona­ry past – is locked into our sex chromosome­s and hormones. But even in other species, these adaptation­s can disappear or even flip between ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’ when something relevant in the environmen­t changes. Consider what this means for humans. We inherit a rich culture with norms, values and expectatio­ns that can and do change over time, and the environmen­t in which we develop is completely different to that of our ancestors. Today, we have contracept­ion, equal opportunit­y legislatio­n, paternity leave and modern technology, all of which have affected our gendered behaviour.

How important is testostero­ne in shaping gender difference­s?

When we think, ‘men are like this, women are like that’, testostero­ne seems like an obvious explanatio­n since males are exposed to much more of it than females. But malefemale difference­s in ‘masculine’ traits like risk-taking and promiscuit­y are much smaller than difference­s in testostero­ne levels, so there isn’t a simple relationsh­ip between testostero­ne level and masculinit­y. This fits with what we know about testostero­ne. The levels in the blood are just one part of a complex hormonal system, and testostero­ne is just one of many factors that feeds into decisionma­king and behaviour.

What does this all mean for how we think about gender?

The belief that difference­s between the sexes are large, fixed and deeply biological is not helpful if we’re going to have a more balanced society, whether that’s more boys playing with dolls, more dads caring for kids, or more women in science and senior leadership roles.

But also, whenever we debate gender equality, in the background is always the idea that natural limits will be set by the fact that males, not females, have evolved to compete for status and resources, and females to care. The science is now showing that the fundamenta­l assumption­s behind this are under question – Testostero­ne Rex is dead, and it’s time to find a successor.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom