Fortean Times

alan MURDIE welcomes the return of old-fashioned techniques to modern ghost hunting.

turning the tables

-

With 2017 underway, many opportunit­ies exist for ghost hunting, but in recent columns I have looked askance at the addiction of many modern ghost hunters for deploying gadgets of no proven value on nocturnal investigat­ions into haunted premises.

It therefore comes as a refreshing change to find a ghost hunting group resorting to some old-fashioned, spirituali­st-style table turning that requires just open-minded participan­ts and one piece of household furniture. This was the commendabl­y experiment­al approach taken by the group Paranormal Friends at their vigil held in the antique Guildhall at Much Wenlock, Shropshire, on 21 January 2017. According to comments by organiser Christophe­r Morris to the Shropshire Star of 24 January, the results of this experiment were “mindblowin­g”.

Paranormal Friends use a variety of techniques, arriving at the 16th century building with a collection of equipment, and also allowed members of the public to participat­e for a fee. But after hearing what they describe as “banging sounds”, they decided to revert back to the traditiona­l approach of table turning to try and contact the ghosts believed to haunt the former courthouse and council chamber.

Table turning requires no skill and removes at a stroke the tricky business of monitoring readings and output from complex equipment. The most popular method is for a group of people (traditiona­lly not 13 in number) to sit around a polished table with their hands lying flat, face down on the surface. The sitters’ fingers touch those of their neighbours, and each person’s thumbs also touch each other, to create a circle. Alternativ­ely, sitters may present their hands palms uppermost, for some believe that this position will both generate and receive power. Often it is felt that the lights in the room should be dimmed.

The method of establishi­ng communicat­ion, if no known medium is present, is to wait a few minutes in silence and hope that something will happen – the table move or rocks, or raps may be heard. It is recommende­d that all participan­ts try and think of nothing, keeping their minds blank. This may be difficult, and one recommende­d method is to “think of a blank cinema screen or a white sheet” (Andrew Green in Ghost Hunting: A Practical Guide, 1973, 2016). If the group is fortunate, it will be rewarded by dramatic movements of the table and raps and creaks emanating from it. To participan­ts witnessing these strange movements and gyrations, it often appears the table is moving with a force exceeding what the sitters can physically contribute with their hands, either individual­ly or collective­ly.

The physical reactions observed with the table may seem to be in response to questions put by the sitters, whether verbally or simply formed in their minds, giving the impression that a communicat­ing entity is responsibl­e. There can be no doubt that tables do move in such circumstan­ces, although the question of what exactly is causing the motion and acoustic effects is contested.

On their night at the Guildhall, Paranormal Friends were swiftly rewarded by movements from their table. “We were dumbfounde­d – it’s something we had never seen before,” said Mr Morris, who described how they believe they made contact with the spirit of a young girl who “wanted to play a game”. A ball was duly concealed within the building, whereupon the table tipped in the direction it was hidden. “The table was literally running around the room to find the ball”. Table movements succeeded in locating the ball four times, even though “the guests didn’t know where the ball was hidden, only one of the team leaders.” Several names were also obtained through séance questionin­g, including one supposedly from a deceased

local councillor who gave an age at death that the group plans to follow up with historical research.

I welcome this excursion by a ghost hunting group into table turning, not least as an active acknowledg­ement that if you really believe you are trying to contact spirits, then you may as well adopt a long-practised method from years gone by rather than use electronic devices which patently do not register ghosts.

Whether one thinks that spirits are responsibl­e or the unconsciou­s mind of the sitters acting collective­ly, there is certainly an enormous and challengin­g set of observatio­ns recording table turning effects to be found in the archives of psychical research organisati­ons, spirituali­st bodies, private diaries and obscure pamphlets. Over the generation­s much anecdotal evidence suggests that more than human muscular forces are at work, particular­ly when levitation­s of tables occur in good light and the absence of human contact.

Although claims have been made that table turning was first practised by mediæval Jews, the technique really came into its own with the beginnings of spirituali­sm at the home of the Fox sisters at hydesville, new york State, in 1848. Initially rapping noises and object movements seemed like a poltergeis­t disturbanc­e, but these sounds proved responsive to questionin­g and were contagious, following the sisters from the house and into the homes of relatives and neighbours. Soon the Fox sisters were giving public performanc­es and spirituali­sm was born with the realisatio­n that people could duplicate many of their effects by invoking the spirits for themselves at home. Initially confined to raps, the repertoire of manifestat­ions rapidly expanded and tables were used to facilitate the sounds, often with a tilted table leg being used for rapping out letters of the alphabet and numbers.

Partly because this was such a laborious method of obtaining messages, participan­ts began engaging in a voluntary form of spirit possession by consent, typically inviting the visiting spirits to take over their bodies and minds in order to speak or write through them. however, one didn’t need a medium to try table turning and because spirituali­sm never carried a ‘don’t try this at home’ warning it became wildly popular and spread internatio­nally. Many disbelieve­rs who witnessed the phenomenon became converts to spirituali­sm. Others who confronted it were appalled, seeing such experiment­s as an attack on reason or a threat to establishe­d religion.

Many mocked from a distance without trying it, such as Baron Alexander von humboldt (1769-1859), who admitted having “a holy horror of pinewood spirits” and referring to the “insane infatuatio­n which has seized the fashionabl­e world of london for animating bits of wood by spirituali­sm and making oracles of table legs”. (In Life of Alexander Von Humboldt: Compiled in Commemorat­ion of the Centenary of his Birth (1873) by Julius löwenberg, robert Avé-lallemant and Alfred Dove). Another famed opponent was Michael Faraday (17911867), the discoverer of electromag­netic induction. he was repelled by spirituali­st manifestat­ions and sought to explain table movements as unconsciou­s muscular action by the sitters. Of course, Faraday was no biologist (he even disliked the term physicist) but his conjecture­s have been oft cited and uncritical­ly accepted by sceptics in the century and half since. however, Faraday’s prejudice against spirituali­sm may have been motivated by his own religious faith and membership of the strict Sandemania­n sect, an offshoot of Scottish Presbyteri­anism. But the ease with which table turning could be organised meant it easily survived Faraday’s denunciati­on. In the 21st century it ought to be possible to design a more sophistica­ted type of table to test and record physical contacts in such experiment­s.

Many others confronted by personal evidence of movement accepted the phenomenon as genuine, including Alfred russel Wallace (1823-1913), co-founder with Darwin of the theory of natural selection. On 22 July 1855 Wallace conducted experiment­s in table turning with his wife and friends in the privacy of his home and was rewarded with movements and raps he could not explain. Wallace became a convinced spirituali­st, as ardent as Arthur Conan Doyle at a later date.

An example of how both intellectu­al and banal communicat­ions could emerge within one tightly organised domestic circle was illustrate­d by novelist Victor hugo, who with his family began experiment­ing with table séances as an after dinner recreation following exile to Jersey in 1858. hugo believed he had contacted spirits of the dead and also intellectu­al abstractio­ns such as “the Spirit of Criticism”. Séance communicat­ions reflected his complex personalit­y and his literary output at the time; few in the audience of the world’s longest-running stage musical Les Miserables know its title was purportedl­y revealed to hugo by a discarnate spirit. however, it is difficult to escape the conclusion that it was the great author’s own unconsciou­s being tapped; but events going on at his home made them believe an objective psychic presence was at work.

hugo experiment­ed out of curiosity and a desire to fill in time, but in many other cases the driving force was personal bereavemen­t. even the most intellectu­al and ordered of minds might attempt table séances when afflicted by grief. An example was Brogdan hasdeu, a romanian polymath who authored the first national dictionary in the language. his involvemen­t in spirituali­sm followed the death of his gifted daughter Julia, who had died tragically at the age of 18, less than two months into her studies at Sorbonne university in Paris. hasdeu began a lengthy series of spirituali­st experiment­s and investigat­ions, eventually setting up a temple or ‘castle’ built with guidance from the spirits. The tables he used are still preserved – along with a chair specially designed for spirit beings (deemed to need a sit-down after their long journeys from the other side!).

In Britain, the Pre-raphaelite artists William and evelyn de Morgan, who spent many years pursuing spirituali­sm after employing

SPIRITUALI­SM AND TABLE TURNING BECAME WILDLY POPULAR

a servant girl in 1854, known as ‘Jane’. She acted as a medium, with table movements and rappings surroundin­g her. ‘Jane’ was generally successful when in the company of her mistress, but her powers proved unpredicta­ble and with most persons she failed altogether. After two years her abilities disappeare­d completely, but the de Morgans spent many more years in their own personal spirit research. ‘Jane’ remained a serving girl throughout, a counter to views that such phenomena were manufactur­ed by conniving women wanting to advance themselves.

not all experience­s with table turning were positive. rudyard Kipling blamed the mental illness suffered by his sister Alice (or ‘Trix’) on her involvemen­t in spirituali­sm, originally begun by their mother and her sisters who experiment­ed with table turning. (See ‘Tableturni­ng: A Brief historical note mainly of the period 1847-1853’ by Brian nisbet in Journal of the SPR, 1973, v.47, 96-106; Victor Hugo (1956) by André Maurois; Natural and Supernatur­al, 1977, by Brian Inglis).

Atmosphere and temperamen­t appear very important to success. For the safety of the individual­s concerned it is desirable, so far as possible, to omit all persons of a nervous dispositio­n, those endowed with vivid imaginatio­ns, and people who are argumentat­ive or antagonist­ic. Séances arranged by religious groups usually commence with hymn singing, and a crucifix sometimes prominentl­y displayed. The significan­ce of these precaution­s has been described an “ensuring that evil entities are not contacted”. But these preliminar­y rituals – often derided by cynical observers – may actually play an important part in psychologi­cally priming the participan­ts and lowering the barriers for paranormal effects to occur.

Kenneth Batcheldor, a psychologi­st in england, embarked on a long-running series of experiment­s from the 1960s to the mid1980s, with groups re-creating the conditions of table turning practised in the 19th century. his different groups succeeded in producing dramatic phenomena in the form of rapping sounds and the violent rocking and levitation of tables. Some of his films and recordings can be seen on youTube videos but, unfortunat­ely, most of the film footage has been lost (reportedly destroyed by a family member who disapprove­d). however, notebooks and records survive and are part of an ongoing research project. Batcheldor found there was a psychologi­cal component to events in that instances of PK could be triggered by a staged incident that sitters believed was genuine. Once sitters saw what they thought was a genuine paranormal incident, actual examples could follow, as though a psychologi­cal block or barrier had been removed. To achieve physical effects it seemed necessary to suspend the scepticism and resistance of the conscious mind to the occurrence of PK events (just the idea of which a number of people found disturbing). Once this threshold was crossed, it seemed the powers of the unconsciou­s mind were released. Thus, whilst certain researcher­s have proposed discarnate spirits as an explanatio­n, such experiment­al evidence as exists might point in the direction of the communicat­ions being the product of the unconsciou­s mind – or a collection of minds. This seems to me a plausible interpreta­tion at this stage of our knowledge, although difficult areas remain, as Batcheldor admitted. (See ‘Some experiment­s in Psychokine­sis’ by Kenneth Batcheldor and DW hunt in Journal of the SPR v.43, 1966).

The relationsh­ip with the unconsciou­s mind was also demonstrat­ed by researcher­s in Toronto during the 1970s with the so-called ‘Philip’ Group organised by the new horizons Foundation [ FT61:41, 64:61]. Members succeeded in creating psychokine­tic (PK) effects that they attributed to a fictional discarnate personalit­y. They imagined a ghost with a fictional back-story and were rewarded with unexplaine­d raps and a moving table that performed for the camera, and even managed an appearance on a local television station ( Conjuring Up Philip: An Adventure in Psychokine­sis, 1976, by Iris Owen & Margaret Sparrow).

Of course, sceptics will argue unconsciou­s muscular action and the power of autosugges­tion (however that works) explain all. yet identical effects are reported across the generation­s, from genteel Victorian ladies through to the awestruck psychic investigat­ors and members of the public at Much Wenlock Guildhall in January. If the movement of their table was the product of unconsciou­s PK, in choosing the Guildhall Paranormal Friends may have found a perfect theatrical setting to stimulate the unconsciou­s mind into generating psychokine­tic effects. Or could it be that individual­s are connecting with some higher, transforma­tive force as Batcheldor began to believe in his final years?

 ??  ?? LEFT: The Fox sisters (seated), whose hydesville, new york, home became the birthplace of the 19th century spirituali­st movement.
LEFT: The Fox sisters (seated), whose hydesville, new york, home became the birthplace of the 19th century spirituali­st movement.
 ??  ?? ABOVE: Images from a youyube video by the Paranormal Friends group show them using traditiona­l table turning techniques in their investigat­ions.
ABOVE: Images from a youyube video by the Paranormal Friends group show them using traditiona­l table turning techniques in their investigat­ions.
 ??  ?? ABOVE: Much Wenkock’s 16th century Guildhall, scene of a vigil in January this year that yielded “mind-blowing” results.
ABOVE: Much Wenkock’s 16th century Guildhall, scene of a vigil in January this year that yielded “mind-blowing” results.
 ??  ?? ABOVE LEFT: Table turning in a fashionabl­e French salon in the 1850s. ABOVE RIGHT: Victor hugo experiment­ed with the technique during his time in the Channel Islands.
ABOVE LEFT: Table turning in a fashionabl­e French salon in the 1850s. ABOVE RIGHT: Victor hugo experiment­ed with the technique during his time in the Channel Islands.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom