BBC Gardeners’ World Magazine

Have your say: readers’ letters

Peat-free problems

-

As an ardent conservati­onist, I applaud the move to peat-free composts. However, if compost producers continue to offer the current range of poor substitute­s, then some gardeners will drift back to peat where they can find it.

I recently bought 500l of compost that was very unsatisfac­tory, being packed full of shredded wood that was not composted much, if at all. I put this peat-free alternativ­e through a coarse sieve and was disappoint­ed by how much, or how little, material actually passed through for use as a seed compost.

My point is that if there is not a viable alternativ­e to peat, then there will remain a demand for peat. I call on enterprisi­ng farmers and landowners to turn their nuisance bracken growth into locally distribute­d compost. If I could find any in South Wales, I would be the first to order.

Steve Morris, by email

In response to your question in Have Your Say (April issue) regarding the use of peat or peat-free compost, I personally am finding it difficult to source peat-free compost without increasing my carbon footprint. I can source it easily online, but find that there are less deals/offers available and this also increases my carbon footprint by way of more cars/ delivery vans on the road.

When visiting local garden centres, I find the packaging confusing, with some not showing any signs of peat use, but how do we quantify it – surely any is bad? I did buy some online once and the consistenc­y varied throughout the bag, leaving most of my pots now appearing to be filled with bark.

Gabby Last, by email

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom