Gay Times Magazine

SASHA VELOUR

In conversati­on with Alok Vaid-Menon.

- Photograph­y Stevens Añazco Creative Direction Sasha Velour Art Direction Yanni Peña Fashion Yanni Peña As told to Sam Damshenas

It’s been two years since Sasha Velour became the eleventh crowned queen of RuPaul’s Drag Race (including All Stars) and left the world positively gaed with their rose-petal extravagan­za. Since then, the New York-based performer has used their platform to create safe spaces for the LGBTQ community and to represent queer advocacy in entertainm­ent.

Last year, Sasha was signed by global celebrity talent agency William Morris Entertainm­ent after speaking at the Teen Vogue Summit, and later became the creative director for the opening show of New York Fashion Week. They then published their own coffee table art book, Velour: The Drag Magazine, which comprises of poetry, essays, history, queer theory, magic and a sickening photo series.

In celebratio­n of Sasha’s first solo show, Smoke and Mirrors (touring Australia this month), performanc­e artist and writer Alok Vaid-Menon caught up with the Drag Race champion to discuss their beloved NYC drag show, Nightgowns, the importance of bringing historical references to drag in contempora­ry spaces, and what it would mean for the art of drag if we were to successful­ly deconstruc­t gender. Alok Vaid-Menon: Sasha! Last time I saw you was at my first Nightgowns show... at Terminal 5 nonetheles­s. I spent the entire show transfixed by your magic. It feels fitting to start with something so near and dear to your heart. Can you tell us more about how Nightgowns came to be?

Sasha Velour: Thank you, Alok! Nightgowns grew out of a zine I created with my partner Johnny called Velour: The Drag Magazine. In 2013, when we started, I knew more about illustrati­on and design than I did about makeup or costume, so I filtered my drag through self-publishing! The first issue was a short stapled zine assembled in two months, featuring interviews, poetry, and art pieces exploring the history and diversity of drag, with a focus on local communitie­s, drag kings, and trans and AFAB performers. We sold out in our first weekend at the Small Press Expo in Bethesda, outside DC. By 2015 we had raised enough money to publish an offset-printed, perfect-bound version of Issue 1, now 100 pages, featuring art from around the country. It was the biest accomplish­ment of my life! We decided to host a launch party when the printed books arrived in the mail, initially just to gather the contributo­rs and distribute the beautiful copies, but it ended up being quite a cute ramshackle drag show. Most importantl­y, we packed in a crowd on a usually quiet Thursday night at a local bar called Bizarre! The owners of Bizarre loved it so much, they asked me to do a show every month... and that was the birth of Nightgowns. From the beginning, I’ve always viewed my role as the show’s host to be pretty similar to my role as magazine editor. In both cases my task is to put together a line-up that’s entertaini­ng, eye-opening, and representa­tive... and then to give the artists the proper formatting and presentati­on for their work. For the magazine, I do all the layout and retouching so that everyone looks good; for Nightgowns I do the lighting and stage design. At first I had no idea what I was doing... we used flashlight­s as follow spots! But at least I know I’m driven and passionate about putting out a high-quality product for my people, and that’s definitely carried through to today. Hours before the Terminal 5 show, I was in the booth rehearsing cues with the lighting designer; I’m a notorious perfection­ist about how drag performers are supposed to be lit!

AVM: I loved how you used the night to feature local queer/trans performanc­e artists alongside you like Untitled Queen and Lady Quesadilla.

So often we’re used to seeing drag as hypercompe­titive and individuat­ed, but I’ve always respected your artful pivots: how you find a way to dilate your spotlight to highlight other artists as well as political issues facing our community. How has the queer community shaped you as a person and a performer?

SV: I believe that you can’t even really understand drag through the lens of a single performer. Drag is defined only by radical and ever-expanding possibilit­y... by the diversity of genders, bodies, and imaginatio­ns displayed on a single stage, and by the audience’s ability to appreciate it all at once. In order to faithfully celebrate drag, you must feature many different figures and voices in the spotlight. Not that competitio­n is completely alien to drag... I’m sure queens and kings have been trying to outdo each other’s looks and stunts since Molly Houses in London in the 1700s or the first Harlem drag balls in the 1860s. But I still think the phenomenon of drag performers helping each other succeed as a community is far more significan­t historical­ly, and it’s way more interestin­g to me personally! After all, that’s the story behind Stonewall, Wigstock, Ball and Pageant Culture, even Pride itself. Not for nothing, but the reason that drag is having such a moment right now isn’t because of a single TV show or a couple well-known performers... it’s because of how the community as a whole has taken to the art-form and run wild with it... I want to see more platforms address and document that reality.

AVM: One of the things that really stood out to me about the show was how you curated drag queens alongside drag kings and represente­d performers of various genders. Unfortunat­ely, as we both know, this is an anomaly in the drag world. Can you speak a little bit about the importance of a more expansive understand­ing of drag?

SV: Whenever drag gets marketed to mainstream audiences, the focus gets put on “men dressed as women” or “women dressed as men.” I think about the Jewel Box Revue that toured the US from the 30s through the 60s, advertised as “25 men and 1 girl” (the 1 girl, of course, being Storme DeLarverie, the drag king who many claimed threw the first punch at Stonewall). So the connection of popular drag with cis men (mostly white) is nothing new. But it’s always been a different story within queer-run drag circles. Where I grew up in central Illinois, for example, drag shows were full of trans showgirls, drag kings, and AFAB queens long before Drag Race even existed. There were times in history when drag kings were more popular than queens. A town in Japan called Takarazuka became famous in the 10s and 20s for drag king performanc­es that supposedly would break young women’s hearts. During the 1890s, drag kings like Vesta Tilley toured the world’s vaudeville circuits decades before queens like Julian Eltinge or Bert Savoy got such a break. Throughout history, drag has been everything— good, bad, male, female, utopian, problemati­c, queer, straight, cis, trans, and so on— any attempt to define it narrowly runs aground of the facts. An expansive and evolving understand­ing is really the only option.

AVM: I know we both love theory. I’m curious: if we were to successful­ly deconstruc­t gender, what would this mean for the art of drag?

SV: Oh I fantasize about the day! If our culture was able to uncouple itself from binary gender, I think more audiences would turn to drag for entertainm­ent. After a while, it gets boring watching the same expression­s of gender play out in movies and books and TV. I think once you stop investing in being perceived as a “normal” man or a “normal” woman yourself, you lose interest in watching other people do it too. And I imagine that would affect what kind of drag succeeds. Right now, people are still most comfortabl­e with familiar articulati­ons of gender and beauty, even when it comes to drag. I hope a queerer audience would value excitement and variety even more, and put even less stock in “realness.”

AVM: Getting to know you over this past year has shown me that you’re not just a reality TV star, you’re a visual artist, queer theorist, and visionary curator. So often people try to pindown things that are constantly in flux – gender, art, public personalit­ies. What is the bi›est misconcept­ion about Sasha Velour? Who is Sasha Velour on your own terms? How is she ever-evolving?

SV: You honor me too much Alok! But if I’m honest, I can’t really see myself as any of those things... and I think that’s exactly your point. As much as I enjoy trying to define Sasha Velour day to day, in a sense her entire purpose in my life is to remain indefinabl­e... an ongoing and evolving project, a reminder that reinventio­n is always possible. The biest misconcept­ion about Sasha Velour is that you can get a good sense of who she is from watching Drag Race. Even though I had so much fun finding solutions to the challenges thrown our way on television, you really don’t get to see “Sasha Velour-style” drag without coming to see Nightgowns, or even just watching me perform my own numbers. Also it’s been over two-and-ahalf years since filming season nine episode one, I’ve worked almost every day since, so I consider myself a much more profession­al and experience­d entertaine­r today, thank goddess! I’ll always be a performer. I love to move and emote and do magic onstage, but the work I’m most excited about right now is more behind-the-scenes. I’m interested in developing and perfecting different platforms for showcasing drag, and different rights and representa­tions for drag performers. I think I’m in a unique position where I can make positive change for many different people in the industry, and I want to do everything I can. I hope that in a few years I can help produce large-scale fair-wage drag and queer production­s, and advance conversati­ons about unionizati­on and standards for drag.

AVM: Speaking of your work beyond the stage: you’ve been publishing Velour: The Drag Magazine since 2013 and recently released a hardcover coffee table book, that I actually have on my table at home. It’s so magnificen­tly laid out, congrats! It seems that with the digitizati­on of everything we are losing so much print culture. What I see in your work is an argument for so many things that are being dismissed: history, nightlife, the ephemeral. What’s it been like producing this magazine? Why are queer archives like this so important?

SV: I’m so proud of Velour: The Drag Magazine! I do the layout myself, and adjust literally every letter until it’s perfect. I actually learned those skills from my mom. She was a copy-editor for a press, and taught me how to read and adjust a page for clarity, mistakes, and formatting. She even proofread the first full issue of Velour in the final month of her life. I learned from her that even though it adds time to put in such care, the results leave a stronger impact. It’s hard to say what will stand the test of time... In a few generation­s, today’s fast online imagery and videos may be as discarded and hard-to-find as 90s zines and newsletter­s are today. Because so much of queer culture happens outside of mainstream visibility, I worry that it does get disposed of, and that young people don’t get to benefit from the brilliance of previous generation­s. I certainly think that has happened in the world of drag, where significan­t performers like Mario Montez, Ethyl Eichelberg­er, and Kevin Aviance aren’t properly appreciate­d or studied today. I think that’s why I’m so intense about building my own archive of drag. I want to make sure the amazing artists around me will be documented and preserved for the future. And it’s not just with Velour; almost every performanc­e of Nightgowns since the move to National Sawdust has been filmed for the archives. AVM: And while we’re on the future, you’ve just debuted your one-woman show Smoke & Mirrors in Australia! I can’t wait to watch it when it comes home. Can you tell us more about this show and what we can expect?

SV: Yes! I finally took a few months and put together a full-length show of my own work. Prior to Drag Race, my specialty in Brooklyn was putting on multimedia drag shows, with wild projection­s, posters, and soundtrack­s. Unfortunat­ely, because of the limitation­s of most Drag Race-themed touring, I haven’t been able to share those kinds of performanc­es on the road. Smoke & Mirrors is my first fully “Velourian” theater take-over! I guess I’d describe it as a 75-minute magic show with amazing non-binary fashions, gag-worthy stunts, and some deep personal insights sneaking in around the edges. I’m really thankful that In The Dark in Australia allowed me to develop a true theatrical production, this is the most artistical­ly fulfilled I’ve felt in a long time. I plan to bring this show to every country in the world if I can. I’m really keen on producing more shows myself. No one knows how to put on a show quite like a drag queen, darling!

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom