Glamorgan Gazette

Art branded ‘disgracefu­l waste of money...’

- HUW SILK huw.silk@walesonlin­e.co.uk

THESE structures have been compared to Toblerones – with some residents of a South Wales village baffled as to what they represent.

The steel artwork at Ogmore by Sea was funded by tens of thousands of pounds from private housing developer Barratt Homes as part of an agreement when it was given planning permission under so-called section 106 conditions.

But questions are being raised as to whether the money would have been better spent on community facilities such as the village hall.

The community council and residents have lodged formal complaints with the county council, although the authority has pointed out it never received nor spent the money.

It added that public art is a requiremen­t for housing developmen­ts and that it was the responsibi­lity of the developer to carry out a consultati­on with residents.

Sue Lewis, a community councillor and Ogmore by Sea resident, said: “The installati­ons are seen by most as ugly and inappropri­ate for their context.”

Describing them as “eyesores begging [for] vandalism and graffiti”, she added: “They provide no visual or recreation­al purpose to a community that has grown by over 50% in the last year and still has no play or social areas to speak of.

“It is seen as a disgracefu­l waste of public money.”

Welsh Conservati­ve leader Andrew RT Davies, who has met residents including Mrs Lewis at the installati­on, said: “Section 106 contributi­ons can be hugely beneficial to a local community, and a good way for residents to get something back if they have suffered disruption as a result of a developmen­t.

“But it is vital they are used in the most productive way – and that means having the community take part in the decision.”

A spokesman for the Vale council said: “Public art, which helps create a sense of identity and community, was a requiremen­t of this developmen­t as part of a council policy that indicates a minimum 1% of such a project’s budget should be spent in such a manner.

“It was not a financial contributi­on that the council received or spent. In this case, the budget for the art installati­on was £68,000.

“Any consultati­on with the wider community was a matter for the developer, and the council would hope that such an exercise would be carried out.”

Steve Williams, managing director of developer Barratt South, said: “A planning condition is imposed on all developers building within the Vale of Glamorgan to provide public art to the value of 1% of build costs.

“We worked with an art consultant to identify suitable artists and the final concepts are submitted to the council for approval.

“Full liaison and engagement takes place with the local authority and they sign off and approve the art commission to allow it to proceed to fabricatio­n and installati­on.”

 ??  ?? Residents of Ogmore by Sea have demanded that the council explain a decision to spend over £100,000 of section 106 contributi­ons on a public art project, with no consultati­on
Residents of Ogmore by Sea have demanded that the council explain a decision to spend over £100,000 of section 106 contributi­ons on a public art project, with no consultati­on
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom