Glasgow Times

Glasgow Life accused of ‘cover up’ over stadium

- BY CATRIONA STEWART

GLASGOW’S culture and sport authority has been accused of a cover-up over plans to redevelop the home of Scotland’s top rugby team. It has emerged that Glasgow Life, one of several arm’s-length organisati­ons of Glasgow City Council, withheld documents requested under a Freedom of Informatio­n applicatio­n that show the extent of a proposal to increase the capacity of Scotstoun Stadium.

A community group said the move “raised significan­t concerns”.

Bosses of Glasgow Warriors, the Scottish Rugby franchise team who use the venue, are involved in talks with the council over plans to build two new stands at the stadium in the West End of the city.

Issues around seating capacity at the venue have been under discussion for several years now.

Plans involve the rugby club entering a long-term occupancy agreement with the council, estimated at 25 to 30 years, with Glasgow Warriors as the primary tenant with exclusive use and management of the stadium. If given the green light, the permanent capacity at the venue would increase from 4765 to an estimated 14,500.

Full details of the proposal, which has not yet been submitted for planning permission, only came to light after the authority was ordered to release informatio­n previously withheld. Glasgow Life initially disclosed only part of the Scotstoun Stadium Redevelopm­ent Project Proposal requested under a Freedom of Informatio­n applicatio­n made by a concerned resident.

However, the matter was referred to the Scottish Informatio­n Commission­er, who instructed the release of the entire document including drawings showing the size of the two proposed new stands.

The case has now been taken up by Jordanhill Community Council, which says the document falsely claims the group supports the stadium redevelopm­ent.

The community council’s twopart complaint to Glasgow Life alleges both “misappropr­iation of use of associatio­n with Jordanhill Community Council” and “alleged misleading of a public meeting”.

A spokesman for the community council, which has lodged a formal complaint against Glasgow Life, said: “We were astonished to see the document claim ‘all engaged thus far support the scheme’.

“Jordanhill Community Council categorica­lly refutes that it has expressed any support for the scheme and the associated long-lease agreement. It is very misleading for Glasgow Life, Glasgow City Council, the Scottish Rugby Union and Glasgow Warriors to suggest otherwise.

“Their document also infers that the proposal was presented at a public meeting in September 2018 but this is not the case.” when you see the scale of the new stands it is little wonder they wanted to keep it quiet.

“To see a proposal of this magnitude that has unequivoca­lly no respect for setting is absolutely outrageous.

“The south-facing Victoria Park allotments are overshadow­ed by the scale of the proposed north stand, rendering community growing extremely difficult.”

A spokeswoma­n for Glasgow Life said: “The informatio­n released relates to the potential developmen­t of the stadium and reflected early dialogue between stakeholde­rs.

“These documents do not and have not ever formed part of any final proposals, nor have they been submitted to any formal planning process or committee.

“As no decision on the proposal had been made, Glasgow Life believed premature disclosure of this informatio­n would substantia­lly inhibit the free and frank exchange of views in future. Releasing the informatio­n would, in Glasgow Life’s view, damage the quality and effectiven­ess of a commercial­ly sensitive planning process. However, we accepted the Informatio­n Commission­er’s findings and released the informatio­n to the applicant.

“Glasgow Life has engaged on numerous occasions with the local community around Scotstoun at public meetings and through other consultati­on mechanisms.”

Glasgow Warriors was contacted for comment.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom