Gloucestershire Echo

U-turn Campaign group welcomes surgery decision

- leigh.boobyer@reachplc.com By LEIGH BOOBYER

PLANS to move surgery from Cheltenham General Hospital to Gloucester­shire Royal Hospital have been scrapped.

The proposal would have seen emergency and complex planned general surgery centralise­d at Gloucester with planned day-case and short-stay surgery centralise­d at Cheltenham.

But Gloucester­shire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust says it will “set aside” the plans after a bid to take the Trust to the High Court was launched in April.

Campaign group Restore Emergency at Cheltenham General (REACH) said “common sense has prevailed”.

The changes would have seen major general surgery - surgery of the gut moved from Cheltenham to Gloucester from September.

The legal challenge, mounted by REACH argued there was a “serious failure of due process” when drawing up the pilot plans.

The decision follows a letter signed by 57 senior medics expressing concerns about the proposals last November. They believed the plan would be “detrimenta­l” to patients from Gloucester­shire, Wiltshire, Herefordsh­ire and Worcesters­hire, who are treated at Cheltenham General. The Trust, which runs the county’s two main hospital sites, had defended the temporary proposal arguing it would “improve patient safety”.

A trust spokesman said: “The trust has carefully considered the recent challenge to its proposal to pilot changes to the configurat­ion of general surgical services in the county, which are designed to address the growing concerns about the quality and sustainabi­lity of the current service. As a result of these deliberati­ons, the trust has concluded it will set aside the intention to implement the proposed pilot scheme.

“The trust remains wholly committed to ensuring residents throughout Gloucester­shire have access to high quality surgical services, which meet the national standards laid out and equally, that local people are involved in decisions about local services.”

He continued: “Our resolve to address the original drivers for this proposal remain as strong as ever and all general surgeons accept that the current model of service is not sustainabl­e and must change. “We will therefore continue the work to look at options for the future of general surgical services, working with local people, in preparatio­n for the planned public engagement and consultati­on later this year.”

Commenting on the decision, a spokesman for REACH said: “We are relieved. Common sense has prevailed, it is the sensible option.

“Our concerns were that we were going to spend a lot of money on a plan not as thought through as it could have been.

“We wanted them to take some time and engage in consultati­on and work with us and the public, to really ensure we have the right proposal.”

He continued: “The previous plan was not done with enough time, thought and engagement. We are very pleased here and will work with the trust.”

The trust says it will continue to look at other options for the future of the service and will commit to public engagement and consultati­on later this year.

Cheltenham Borough Councillor Martin Horwood (LD, Leckhampto­n), a member of the county’s health scrutiny committee, said: “This is very good news and reflects the concerns of those who challenged the trust, as well as those on the health scrutiny committee.

“If this positive developmen­t is down to anyone, it’s the 57 doctors who were brave enough to speak out about it. They alerted the public in a way no one else could.”

 ??  ?? Cheltenham General Hospital and, inset, Martin Horwood
Cheltenham General Hospital and, inset, Martin Horwood
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom