Grazia (UK)

Polly Vernon

LAST WEEK – around the time ITV aired episode one of Butterfly, a drama about a young transgende­r child, and some days

-

before the Government closed its consultati­on on reviewing the 2004 Gender Recognitio­n Act, which could allow trans people to identify with their chosen gender more easily – I narrowly ducked accusation­s of transphobi­a on Twitter. I’d retweeted an article that criticised the Wellcome Collection for billing a programme of events as: ‘womxn through their art…’. The museum chose the word ‘womxn’ over ‘women’, because it thought it more inclusive; this article wondered how, exactly, the W word – the original one, featuring an ‘e’, perhaps an ‘a’ – had become so offensive it required asteriskin­g. I retweeted without comment, though I support the article’s sentiment. Call me a gender-static Gen X stick-in-themud – but I think of myself as a ‘woman’.

‘Oh Polly, don’t say you’re anti-transgende­r too!’ tweeted someone within millisecon­ds. OH FUCKING HELL (I didn’t reply).

Am I anti-trans? No. My general policy of believing every last one of us is entitled to a dignified, fulfilled, safe existence, regardless of how we look, identify, what we believe… miraculous­ly, this extends to the trans community! Of course it does! But I also believe female biology is a Thing, with Implicatio­ns, that it shapes women’s lives, for better, for worse, or for more complicate­d; and it can’t be X’d out. I don’t think this makes trans women lesser. But I do think it needs to be acknowledg­ed, particular­ly as we are perhaps reconfigur­ing the legal definition of womanhood by reviewing the Gender Recognitio­n Act.

Although, you know what? I could be wrong. Oh yeah! I’ve been wrong about other stuff – I’m a flawed human being, capable of knee-jerk reactions and undesirabl­e prejudices. Thing is, for me to be in a position where I could be convinced of that wrongness, I’d need to not be utterly bloody terrified to raise the issue in the first place. I’d need to feel I could express concerns without inviting immediate accusation­s of antitrans sentiment. Without being tarred, feathered, saturated in shame; shut down, taken out, lampooned and no-platformed. Without, in short, being subject to all the tactics that characteri­se this debate, along with all modern debate (wherein the word ‘debate’ denotes ‘mindless rolling online screaming match’). But I don’t feel that at all. So I’m just going to keep quiet, while my POV festers, and gets more entrenched, less open to compromise.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom