History of War

Kills & losses

-

The debate and research concerning this topic continues to exercise the minds of historians. No single source can really claim to be definitive as both sides had their own reasons for overstatin­g their ‘kill’ count. The Soviets inflated their numbers, particular­ly of Tigers, to justify their own severe losses. The Germans did so for the simple reason that they lost. Equally problemati­c is the definition of a ‘kill’: does it mean a track blown off, the turret blown off, or the vehicle sinking into the mud up to the track tops and being abandoned? Furthermor­e, some Russian researcher­s in the post-soviet world have reflected their anti-communist stance to inflate Red Army losses. Here is not the place to enter this complex discussion.

There was something in the region of 95 Tigers operable with AGS on 4 July, and by 15 July, when AGS halted and the last blow of Operation Citadel had been struck, there were 63 available. However, the Soviets did not consider the fighting in the Kursk Bulge (as the Russians call it) on the southern face over until 23 July and so continued to count kills.

AGC’S Tiger losses, from the 31 tanks committed on 5 July, are awkward to assess as the records of Ninth Army are difficult to access. However, on 10 July there were 26 still operationa­l. By 12 July AGC had shot its bolt and the Soviets had unleashed Operation Kutuzov that aimed to destroy AGC. Judging by those figures, 37 Tigers were irretrieva­bly lost by both AGS and AGC.

Keeping score for the T-34 was less problemati­c as it was a familiar and easily identified vehicle.

The three fronts involved, including armour from Steppe Front, committed 2,730, of which 854 were lost by Voronezh and Steppe Fronts, but only 175 by Central Front. This simply reflects the different commitment levels of armour on the northern and southern faces of the salient. It must also be remembered that at the end of operations the Red Army was in a position to pick over the remains of its tanks and restore what was worth saving, whereas the Germans were not. Soviet tank crews were paid a bonus of 1,000 roubles for every confirmed kill. Interestin­gly Stalin, not generally fussed over casualties, almost put General Rotmistrov, commander of Fifth GTA, on trial for his command’s losses at Prokhorovk­a.

“STALIN, NOT GENERALLY FUSSED OVER CASUALTIES, ALMOST PUT GENERAL ROTMISTROV (COMMANDER OF FIFTH GTA) ON TRIAL FOR HIS COMMAND’S LOSSES AT PROKHOROVK­A”

 ??  ?? In part the confusion and controvers­y concerning losses can be understood in this images of wrecked Panzer IVS. With the turret encircled with an armoured screen it would appear to be a Tiger I. It is not surprising that Soviet tankers, keen to impress...
In part the confusion and controvers­y concerning losses can be understood in this images of wrecked Panzer IVS. With the turret encircled with an armoured screen it would appear to be a Tiger I. It is not surprising that Soviet tankers, keen to impress...
 ??  ?? PAVEL ROTMISTROV’S FIFTH GUARDS ARMY SUFFERED SUCH HIGH LOSSES THAT STALIN CONSIDERED ARRESTING HIM
PAVEL ROTMISTROV’S FIFTH GUARDS ARMY SUFFERED SUCH HIGH LOSSES THAT STALIN CONSIDERED ARRESTING HIM
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom