History of War

KÖNIGGRÄTZ

The Prussians isolated, trapped and destroyed the army of the Austrian Empire, using a combinatio­n of new technologi­es and hastening the process of German unificatio­n

- WORDS MURRAY DAHM

Prussian battlefiel­d tactics are pitched against overwhelmi­ng odds

The battle of Königgrätz (also known as the battle of Sadowa or the battle of Chlum) was the most decisive clash between the armies of Prussia and those of Austria and her allies during the short, seven-week long, Austro-prussian War in 1866.

The war itself is also known under several different titles. Königgrätz was one of the largest battles of the age with almost half a million men fighting on the field.

Rivalry of Austria and Prussia

The context of the Austro-prussian War was one of nationalis­m and the unificatio­n of German states. At the time, the Austrian Empire and the Kingdom of Prussia were the two largest and most dominant forces in the German-speaking world. There were actually 37 separate states in the German Confederat­ion but their unificatio­n became a hot topic known as ‘The German Question’ in the post Napoleonic world. In the early 19th century Prussia and

Austria had been obligated to be allies against Napoleon, but from 1815 tensions had grown over which of the states would lead the new ideology of German nationalis­m; unificatio­n under Prussia was known as ‘Little Germany’ and under Austria ‘Big Germany’. Events of the 1848 Revolution, however, showed that Austria was not going to take the lead in such a nationalis­t movement and this opened the way for the kingdom of Prussia to be the key stakeholde­r. During the 1848 Revolution,

“IT IS STILL DEBATED WHETHER THE PRUSSIAN MINISTER PRESIDENT AND FOREIGN MINISTER, OTTO VON BISMARCK, ORCHESTRAT­ED ALL THESE EVENTS IN ORDER TO BRING ABOUT A WAR WITH AUSTRIA”

Austrian and Russian forces brutally crushed the Hungarian Revolution in 1849 (concession­s would be granted in the aftermath of 1866, creating the Austro-hungarian Empire in 1867). The events leading up to the war of 1866 were the positionin­g of Prussia to be the dominant force in the unificatio­n of Germany.

Another debated topic in 19th century politics was the Schleswig-holstein Question. This involved the disputed land between Prussia and Denmark in the Jutland Peninsula. Denmark claimed the disputed territory in 1848 but a Prussian army came to the aid of the German-speaking majority. The war ended in Danish victory in 1851 but the question was unresolved. In 1863 another attempt to integrate the territory into the Kingdom of Denmark was made leading to a second war in 1864. Prussia again invaded, this time with Austria as an ally. The alliance was so successful that they invaded Denmark itself, eventually occupying all of the Danish mainland. The Treaty of Vienna ceded the disputed territorie­s to Prussia and Austria from Denmark (losing 40 per cent of her total area and population). Prussia wanted to absorb the territorie­s into her kingdom as provinces, but Austria wanted them to be independen­t autonomous duchies. Under the Gastein Convention of 1865, Prussia would control Schleswig and Austria Holstein.

The rest of Europe, as well as the other German states, reacted negatively to the Convention but it set the stage for war between the two rivals the following year.

It is still debated whether the Prussian Minister President and Foreign Minister, Otto von Bismarck, orchestrat­ed all these events in order to bring about a war with Austria and even to

“KÖNIGGRÄTZ WAS ONE OF THE LARGEST BATTLES OF THE AGE WITH ALMOST HALF A MILLION MEN FIGHTING ON THE FIELD”

achieve

German unificatio­n with Prussia as the dominant power. This has been claimed, Bismarck himself doing so, but it seems highly unlikely since the outstandin­g successes of

Prussian arms were not anticipate­d at the start of 1864. Much more likely is Bismarck’s manipulati­on of opportunit­y and circumstan­ce, especially quickly exploiting unexpected successes to Prussia’s advantage. He proved his abilities now in assessing the moment to strike against Austria in 1866. Russia, Austria’s ally in 1848, had been put off-side by Austria’s joining the French and British alliance against Russia in the Crimean War in 1854-55. Prussia had also supported Russia during the January Uprising in Poland in 1863, Austria had not. Bismarck also met with the French Emperor, Napoleon III, to seek assurances that France would not intervene

in an Austro-prussian conflict. Prussia also had an ally in Italy, who wanted to end Austrian control of several northern Italian provinces, meaning the Austrians would be facing an enemy on two fronts and would necessaril­y need to divert some of her forces south.

A pretext for war

In early 1866 the issue of the status and governance of Schelwig-holstein erupted. Austria brought the issue before the German Diet on 1 January, Prussia declared the

Gastein Convention null and void and, on 7 June invaded (Austrian controlled) Holstein.

The German Diet voted nine to six to mobilise against Prussia on 14 June and Bismarck declared that the German Confederat­ion was ended and both sides mobilised for war.

The other German states were conflicted on which side to ally with. Several saw that they could not stand against Prussian arms but other autocratic rulers feared their own position if they did not side with Austria. Fear of Prussian expansion was also widespread. In the end the southern German states allied with Austria, including Hanover, Bavaria, Württembur­g, Baden, but also Saxony and Hesse, and others. Prussia had allies in Oldenburg, Bruswick and both Macklenbur­g houses. Several states (including Liechtenst­ein and Luxembourg) remained neutral.

Preparatio­ns and technologi­es

The Second Schleswig War had shown that the military reforms in Prussia, undertaken since 1862 (and one of Bismarck’s first successes) had proved highly effective. These included the adoption of universal conscripti­on (which made Prussia’s potential army much larger). Austria still used old conscripti­on methods which meant the majority of her troops were poorly trained despite having a massive paper strength of ten corps of 83,000 men each. In reality she could only field 320,000 men. Prussian conscripts by contrast were drilled to a much higher degree. Prussian divisions theoretica­lly contained 15,000 men, 700 cavalry and 24 guns each but actual numbers differed. Prussia, aided by a booming economy, also adopted the Dreyse needle gun, a breech-loading, bolt-action rifle capable of faster and more accurate fire than the older muzzle-loading Lorenz rifles of the Austrian army. Prussian troops could fire five rounds a minute, the Austrians could manage two.

Austria was also still burdened with the costs of the Hungarian Revolution and its aftermath. Also, while Prussian reforms had been incredibly effective against the Danish, they had shown that her troops were superior to those of her then-allies, Austria.

Another important factor in the Austroprus­sian war was the use of railroads. The Prussian rail system was more advanced and extensive than that in Austria and this allowed Prussian forces to mobilise, concentrat­e and be transporte­d much faster than those in Austria. The Prussian Chief of the General Staff, Helmuth von Moltke, assessed that Prussia’s five railway lines could concentrat­e almost 300,000 men in under four weeks whereas Austria’s single rail line would take almost twice the time to amass less men. In actuality the use of rail was not seamless, but it marked the way of the future.

“THE PRUSSIAN RAIL SYSTEM WAS MORE ADVANCED AND EXTENSIVE THAN THAT IN AUSTRIA AND THIS ALLOWED PRUSSIAN FORCES TO MOBILISE, CONCENTRAT­E AND BE TRANSPORTE­D MUCH FASTER THAN THOSE IN AUSTRIA”

Invasion

Moltke mobilised his forces on the Prussian border for an invasion of Bohemia through Saxony. This began on 16 June. The Saxons, allied with Austria, were defeated near

Dresden and abandoned their own territory to concentrat­e their forces with the Austrians. The Austrians, meanwhile, had been amassing for a defensive strategy at Olmütz in Moravia in order to protect Vienna. Preliminar­y engagement­s were fought in the last days of June – an Austrian army defeated the Italians at Custoza,

and Hanover (unexpected­ly) defeated a Prussian army at Langensalz­a, but surrendere­d two days later. Elements of the Prussian advance were met by Austrian forces, but these engagement­s were indecisive although the Austrians suffered heavy casualties.

The Austrians had checked the Prussians at Trautenau (Trutnov), their only victory against Prussian forces during the war, but the Prussians were victorious at Gitschin (Jicín).

The Austrians then moved to the fortress of Josefstadt (Josefov) and to defend the mountain passes into Bohemia. Marching against them were three Prussian armies: the First Army under the command of Moltke (although nominally commanded by King Wilhelm), Second Army (commanded by Crown Prince Frederick and Leonhard von Blumenthal) and the Elbe Army (commanded by Karl von Bittenfeld).

Using modern telegraph communicat­ions to his advantage, Moltke was able to coordinate and concentrat­e his three separate forces with precision. He guessed that the Austrian commander, Ludwig von Benedek, would retreat to the Elbe River. Benedek was of Hungarian descent but unwavering­ly loyal to the monarchy and had come to fame in suppressin­g the Hungarian Revolution in 1849 and then in the battles of the Second War of Italian Unificatio­n in 1859, especially at San Martino. He was old-fashioned and believed courage and valour were the soldier’s most important tools on the battlefiel­d. He also knew his limitation­s as a commander and this may have been the cause of his reticence on the battlefiel­d. The preferred

Austrian method was Stoßtaktik (shock tactics), 1,000 man columns engaging with the enemy at close quarters. These tactics suited Benedek’s concept of war but were sadly outdated.

The accuracy and rapid fire of the Prussian rifles would decimate the courageous advances of the Austrians, inflicting huge losses.

Austrian backs to the wall

Benedek knew from the losses inflicted in the opening engagement­s of the war that his army faced annihilati­on if he faced the Prussians en masse. He also realised his dispositio­ns had been in error. On 30 June, he requested that the emperor, Franz Josepf I, make peace but this was refused. Benedeck took position on high ground between Sadowa and Könnigrätz with the Elbe River at his rear.

His position was sighted by the Prussians on the evening of 2 July and plans were made to attack the following morning. The Prussian Elbe and First armies were in position but communicat­ion with the Second Army, on the Prussian left flank, was broken and so old-fashioned dispatch riders were sent, reaching the Second Army at 4.00am on 3 July. Nonetheles­s, the Second Army immediatel­y leapt into action and marched to close the trap on the Austrians later that day.

Opening salvos

The Austrians had a superior position defended by artillery and defence works erected on high ground stretching from Problus (Probluz) to Chlum. They also outnumbere­d the two Prussian armies which initially opposed them; the Elbe army was 39,000 strong and the First Army had 85,000 men. The Austrians had 215,000 men, with the army of Saxony on their left flank. In the rain, the Austrian artillery opened fire just before 8.00am. The Austrians should

have had the edge in regard to artillery, with modern, breech-loading rifled artillery whereas the Prussians still used smooth bore, muzzleload­ing cannons. Despite the greater accuracy and longer range of the Austrian artillery, this edge would not prove decisive. This opening artillery barrage pinned the Elbe Army under Bittenfeld in place and allowed the Saxons to withdraw. On the left flank of the Prussian centre, General Eduard von Fransecky advanced with the 7th Division into the Swiepwald Forest where he clashed with two Austrian Corps.

Fransecky was tasked with clearing the Austrian centre and covering the Prussian right flank until the arrival of the Second Army. The First Army moved in support of Fransecky, capturing Sadowa and wading across the Bistritz (Bystrice) River. This advance was, however, halted by accurate Austrian artillery fire. All reserves were committed by midday but the Second Army had not yet arrived.

A battle lost?

Some commentato­rs have argued that Benedek could have won the battle at the moment the Prussian First Army’s advance was halted if he had ordered a charge by his cavalry. Benedek had placed his cavalry behind both his guns and his infantry corps so it is unlikely he would have committed his cavalry to such a move. What is more, the Prussian 7th Division held the Swiepwald and were thus relatively immune to artillery fire and would discourage any cavalry charge since an Austrian cavalry charge into the Prussian centre would then have the Prussian 7th Division on their right flank and perhaps even in their rear. The damp ground was also a factor to dissuade Benedek from ordering a cavalry charge. Up to now Benedek’s superior numbers and the greater range of his artillery kept the Prussians at bay and the battle was going in his favour.

The Infantry battle being waged in the Swiepwald also meant that the Austrians could not use their artillery for fear of hitting their own troops. What is more, Austrian troops were only committed to the fighting a brigade at a time which meant they could be defeated by the superior weapons, faster rate of fire, and better training of the Prussians.

The 7th Division held off almost onequarter of the Austrian strength because they were not attacked in strength. In this way, Benedek nullified his own advantages whilst his men charged into the teeth of the superiorit­ies of the Prussians.

At around 11.00am the Austrians began to manoeuvre to outflank the Prussian 7th Division on their right. Finally, an Austrian charge led by Colonel Pöckh of the 4th Corps, commanding of a brigade consisting of two infantry regiments and a feldjäger battalion, all but dislodged the Prussian 7th Division from the Swiepwald. Benedek, however, refused to order a charge against the pinned Frist and Elbe armies even though his commanders insisted he do so. If Benedek was waiting for a better moment we will never know, because the moment had passed and the battle had turned.

The arrival of the Second Army

Pöckh’s Brigade, flushed from their successful charge, had no time to savour their success. They were suddenly hit with devastatin­g fire on their right flank as the advance units of the Prussian Second Army finally arrived on the field. Pöckh himself was killed and the brigade was obliterate­d, 2,000 dead in minutes and barely a man unwounded.

At the same time, the Prussian 8th Division strengthen­ed the 7th and the Austrians, who had belatedly moved to outflank the Prussians on their right, now presented their own exposed right flank to the newly arriving Prussian Second Army. The bulk of the Second Army was not in position until approximat­ely 2.30pm but this was still a remarkable feat – marching more than 20 miles and having only received orders at 4.00am that morning.

The balance now shifted decisively. Crown Prince Frederick and the Second Army brought 100,000 fresh Prussian troops to the field and they now outnumbere­d the Austrians. What is more, the new troops had a vulnerable flank to attack and they lost no time in taking advantage. The Second Army attacked the Austrian right flank as they made more piecemeal attacks on the reinforced Swiepwald. The artillery of the Second Army could also fire on to the Austrian centre. The Prussian cavalry of the 1st Guards Division of the Second Army broke through to the Austrian artillery forcing it to withdraw. It could therefore no longer support any attacks being made by Austrian forces. Benedek was forced to order the general withdrawal of his forces at 3.00pm. The Austrians had already taken heavy casualties but the attacks of the

“THEY WERE SUDDENLY HIT WITH DEVASTATIN­G FIRE ON THEIR RIGHT FLANK AS THE ADVANCE UNITS OF THE PRUSSIAN SECOND ARMY FINALLY ARRIVED ON THE FIELD. PÖCKH HIMSELF WAS KILLED AND THE BRIGADE WAS OBLITERATE­D”

Second Army broke them. Units of the Second Army broke through the Austrian lines and took Chlum (which was in front of the Austrian line facing the Prussian 7th Division). The Austrians were now in complete disarray.

The Elbe Army, held in place since the opening of the battle, now advanced and broke through the Saxons and the Austrian left flank, taking Problus. Wilhelm ordered an advance across the entire Prussian line. The advancing units reached Chlum just as the Austrians had finally forced the 1st Guards Division back into the town. The superior firepower of the advancing Prussians proved decisive and the Austrians were unable to stand before them. A series of cavalry charges and artillery reposition­ed in the rear allowed the retreating artillery and infantry to cross the Elbe, but these were conducted at a heavy price.

The cost

The Prussians had lost in total 9,000 men killed or wounded, most from artillery fire and successful counteratt­acks in the Swiepwald. The Austrians had lost 44,000 men killed or wounded with a further 22,000 captured (along with almost 200 cannons). Some accounts claim these high losses are exaggerate­d and place the number of Austrians killed or wounded much lower at around 14,500, others that the 44,000 includes the prisoner tally.

The aftermath

The victorious Prussians did not pursue aggressive­ly but continued to shadow the Austrians until the armistice on 22 July. Bismarck encouraged Wilhelm to make peace quickly so as not to cause acrimony towards Prussia amongst the other German states. Austria’s reputation and position within the German states was severely damaged, indeed the idea of a ‘Big Germany’ was essentiall­y laid to rest – Austria was permanentl­y excluded from German affairs. By contrast Prussia's position was enhanced and she absorbed several of Austria’s allies including Hanover, Hesse and Nassau. Schleswigh­olstein also became a province of Prussia. Saxony was not annexed but joined with Prussia the following year. Liechtenst­ein and Luxembourg became independen­t states.

With Austria excluded, Prussia formed and led the North German Confederat­ion, created in 1867 and incorporat­ing all states north of the Main River. Prussia chose not to demand any Austrian territory and thus not alienate the Austrian Empire entirely. Austria did surrender Venetia to France who then gifted it to the Kingdom of Italy. The remaining German states allied with Prussia in the (more decisive) Prussian victories which followed in the Franco-prussian War of 1870-1871.

This opened the way for both German unificatio­n and the creation of the German Empire under Kaiser Wilhelm I (and with

Otto von Bismarck as chancellor) in 1871.

The humbled Austria meanwhile, quickly compromise­d with Hungary, forming the dualmonarc­hy Austria-hungary in 1867.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? FAR RIGHT: The Austrian commander, Ludwig (Lajos) von Benedek. Of Hungarian descent, the defeat at Königgrätz ended his career
The Prussian King, Wilhelm I oversees the defeat of the Austrians accompanie­d by Chancellor Bismarck, Moltke, and Minister of War, Albrecht Roon
FAR RIGHT: The Austrian commander, Ludwig (Lajos) von Benedek. Of Hungarian descent, the defeat at Königgrätz ended his career The Prussian King, Wilhelm I oversees the defeat of the Austrians accompanie­d by Chancellor Bismarck, Moltke, and Minister of War, Albrecht Roon
 ??  ?? The first Prussian Regiment of Guards storms Chlum in the course of this decisive Prussian victory
The first Prussian Regiment of Guards storms Chlum in the course of this decisive Prussian victory
 ??  ?? Frederick Charles, Prince of Prussia, victor at Battle of Königgrätz in 1866
Frederick Charles, Prince of Prussia, victor at Battle of Königgrätz in 1866
 ??  ?? Prussian officers Otto von Bismarck and Helmuth von Moltke on the battlefiel­d
Prussian officers Otto von Bismarck and Helmuth von Moltke on the battlefiel­d
 ??  ?? Kaiser Wilhelm I in hussar uniform (he would accept the title of Kaiser following victory in the Francoprus­sian War in 1871)
Kaiser Wilhelm I in hussar uniform (he would accept the title of Kaiser following victory in the Francoprus­sian War in 1871)
 ??  ?? Prussian infantry fire on the advancing columns of Austrians
Prussian infantry fire on the advancing columns of Austrians
 ??  ?? The memorial at Chlum, scene of some of the heaviest fighting and where Prussian forces broke through the Austrian lines
The memorial at Chlum, scene of some of the heaviest fighting and where Prussian forces broke through the Austrian lines
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom