History of War

KENNEDY, CASTRO AND CAUTION

Any real opportunit­y for the Bay of Pigs invasion to succeed would have required the full commitment of US military might

-

The fiasco of the Bay of Pigs invasion has been described as both “too much” and “not enough”. The operation was too large to keep secret and too small for a realistic chance of success. When President Kennedy examined the CIA plan, his concerns that overt American participat­ion might lead to Soviet interventi­on and spark World War III trumped his desire to topple the Marxist regime of Fidel Castro in Cuba. Kennedy declined to forcefully intervene as the long days of mid-april 1961 wore on. After the pre-emptive air strike intended to cripple Castro’s air force failed, photos of the Cia-supplied planes were published, revealing early US involvemen­t in the abortive operation. Kennedy cancelled a followup mission. On 19 April, he authorised an umbrella of six unmarked US fighter planes to cover another air attack, but a rendezvous with expatriate bombers was bungled.

OVERT U.S. PARTICIPAT­ION MIGHT LEAD TO SOVIET INTERVENTI­ON AND SPARK WORLD WAR III

 ??  ?? Fidel Castro reportedly led forces at the Bay of Pigs from this Soviet SU-100 tank destroyer
Fidel Castro reportedly led forces at the Bay of Pigs from this Soviet SU-100 tank destroyer

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom