Homebuilding & Renovating

Building Regs’ Guide to Dealing with Contaminat­ed Land

The Regs have plenty to say about keeping you safe from the nasties that may be lurking on your plot, as Paul Hymers explains

- Paul Hymers Paul Hymers is a building control officer and has written eight books on home improvemen­t and building homes.

“the legacy of an industrial past can remain in the soil after the source of pollution has been long forgotten”

Building Regs don’t just cover the technicali­ties of building, renovating or extending your home. They’re also concerned with keeping us healthy and safe in our own homes, as Part C – Site preparatio­n and resistance to contaminat­es and moisture – covered in this article, goes to show.

What are Contaminat­es?

You’d expect to find contaminat­es – or contaminat­ed soil – on brownfield plots where, perhaps, an industrial building, petrol station or coal yards stood. However, its presence is not always so obvious, and a site history check may reveal a lighter industrial past or agricultur­al use resulting in contaminat­ion.

Even when nature has recovered the land, the legacy of its past can remain in the soil after the source of pollution has been forgotten. Plots in towns or villages that once saw timber yards or a garage can remain contaminat­ed for decades later and soil reports can read like an inventory for chemical warfare. Mercury, arsenic, lead, phosphates — every kind of poison known to man seems traceable.

An old timber yard site, for example, may be rich

in copper-chrome-arsenic (CCA) from timber preservati­ve spilled over years of wood treatment; a garage plot may be rinsed with hydrocarbo­ns from spilt fuel; and even seemingly green land used for agricultur­e can be polluted by insecticid­es from years of crop-spraying.

Dealing with Contaminat­ion

The process for revealing if contaminat­ion is even likely starts with a desktop study. This is an in-depth historical check of the plot, and the first of potentiall­y four stages to work through and one that is often made a condition of planning permission.

Even where it isn’t a planning condition, requiremen­t C1 of the Building Regulation­s requires precaution­s to protect health and safety from contaminat­ion in the ground.

The good news is that even when the chemical analysis of the soil on site reveals a multitude of contaminan­ts, often the levels are extremely low and below the action level set for each contaminan­t at which they can be a risk to our health.

Some chemicals and metals present may not be directly harmful but they could be damaging to eco systems or the groundwate­r and so they do affect us indirectly.

The controls therefore allow for a surprising­ly wide range of circumstan­ces, from residents growing their own food to aquifer areas where groundwate­r is collected for our water supplies and even (and this bit absolutely astounds me) soil digestion. Yes, humans eating the soil. Apparently it is quite common among children under two, meaning small traces of some contaminan­ts are still a threat.

“Some chemicals and metals could be damaging to eco systems or the groundwate­r”

Where found in a presence exceeding the set action level for each contaminan­t (which is set out in the Regs), they may well have to be dealt with, but only when there is a defined receptor path through which they can cause us harm. A receptor path is the link between contaminat­ion and human harm, such as via a watercours­e, undergroun­d aquifer or growing vegetables in the garden.

Assessing your Plot

Contaminat­ed land assessment­s are undertaken by environmen­tal or geo-technical consultant­s in four stages: Desktop study (including conceptual site model) Site investigat­ion report (including site walkover survey and soil analysis)

Remediatio­n strategy Validation and certificat­ion.

Desktop studies are the foundation stone of any assessment, since they look at the site history, geology and location and provide the baseline about whether the site is likely to be contaminat­ed or not. The CSM (conceptual site model) in- cluded is a risk assessment that identifies the receptor pathway from the source to the recipient (e.g. small children living in the home or aquifer water zones).

In the case of ‘mobile’ contaminan­ts, some will have definite paths — such as radon gas or methane, where the vapour will head to the surface. Other chemicals can sink to pollute the groundwate­r and so on.

The Site Investigat­ion Report

if the desktop study recommends it, this report will involve a site walkover survey and soil sampling to identify any chemicals present, or even drilling boreholes to test groundwate­r for contaminat­ion or to monitor rising gas levels.

Soil and water samples are usually sent to a laboratory for analysis but soil screening for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and petroleum hydrocarbo­ns

(TPH) can also be carried out on site using a photo -ionisation detector.

The report will identify what contaminan­ts are present as well as their concentrat­ion levels and whether they are inert or mobile. All chemicals have different action levels that once reached will be considered too high to be ignored if a receptor path is present.

Your garden surroundin­g the home is the main problem. Soil will be valuable at the surface as a growing me- dium for vegetables and it will be exposed for children to come into contact with. For these reasons alone, contaminat­ed land has to be dealt with effectivel­y.

Remediatio­n

This is usually a specialist contractor’s job, with British Standard documentat­ion setting out how it should be done. The report needs to conclude with any remedial treatment necessary and most importantl­y, an analysis of the cost. if there are particular hotspots on the plot then there may be options: for example these ‘hotspots’ could be removed by bulk excavation and refilled with topsoil, or they may be covered over by a hard-surface driveway and parking area, or even be diluted or bio-treated.

It is also possible that continual long-term monitoring of the soil is needed, particular­ly where contaminat­ion of groundwate­r is a risk. given the ‘perceived risk’ generated by such monitoring exercises and the threat of devaluing or blighting your new home, you might want to think long and hard about building on a plot where long-term monitoring is required.

Common solutions to contaminat­ion, include: Removing contaminat­ed soil. it’s the commonest solution, but a licence for transporti­ng it to a landfill site will be needed.

Biochemica­l or fungal treatment to stabilise the contaminan­ts may be an option as a form of natural treatment, but it’s only available for certain chemicals. Metals, like lead and iron, can’t be treated in this way.

Flushing contaminan­ts out with water or other chemicals as a method of washing the soil can also be done with some contaminan­ts, and indeed even vacuum suction treatment can deal with petrol hydrocarbo­ns and other volatile pollutants. if the nasties can’t be economical­ly taken out of the soil, they may be able to be contained within it by an impervious layer that prevents them from surfacing. Clay is a natural containing material that is often used to line landfill sites — in particular thicknesse­s it prevents any gases from migrating through. Plastic linings have also been used before for the same purpose, but beware: as they have life expectanci­es beyond comprehens­ion, they themselves serve to contaminat­e the environmen­t.

Validation and Certificat­ion

The re-testing and certifying of the soil after treatment is the final part of the process, since it will prove that protection is effective or the ground has been effectivel­y cleansed.

Your building control officer and mostly likely your home warranty surveyor will require copies of this certificat­ion before your new home is deemed safe for occupation.

NEXT MONTH:

Parts J and L explained

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Soil Clearance: the Right and Wrong approach Contaminat­ed and root-infested soil is removed before work begins to excavate a foundation trench (above). The image (right) shows the problems caused by digging a trench before stripping away the contaminat­ed topsoil first.
Soil Clearance: the Right and Wrong approach Contaminat­ed and root-infested soil is removed before work begins to excavate a foundation trench (above). The image (right) shows the problems caused by digging a trench before stripping away the contaminat­ed topsoil first.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom