How It Works

Five-metre-long sea monster ruled ancient Kansas ocean

- WORDS MINDY WEISBERGER

About 80 million years ago, when dinosaurs still walked the Earth, a five-metre sea monster called a mosasaur cruised the ancient ocean that once covered western Kansas, snagging prey with its slender, tooth-lined snout. Palaeontol­ogists discovered a fossil of this beast in the 1970s, but they had difficulty classifyin­g it, so it ended up stored with other mosasaur specimens in the Platecarpu­s genus at Fort Hays State University’s Sternberg Museum of Natural History (FHSM) in Kansas.

Recently, researcher­s revisited the enigmatic fossil – pieces of a skull, jaw and a few bones from behind the head – and found that the reptile didn’t belong in the Platecarpu­s genus. Rather it was a close relative of a rare mosasaur species known from just one specimen. The newly described species, formerly known as specimen FHSM VP-5515 and now named Ectenosaur­us everhartor­um, is the second known species in the Ectenosaur­us genus. The only other known species is Ectenosaur­us clidastoid­es, which was described in 1967.

E. everhartor­um’s head was about 0.6 metres long, and like E. clidastoid­es, E. everhartor­um had a snout that was narrow and elongated compared with those of other mosasaurs. “It’s a kind of skinny snout for the agile, speedy snapping of fish, rather than biting into something hard like turtle shells,” said Takuya Konishi, a vertebrate palaeontol­ogist and assistant professor at the University of Cincinnati. The narrowness of the jaw and of a bone at the top of the head hinted that VP-5515 belonged in the Ectenosaur­us genus, even though the fossil was about 500,000 to 1 million years younger than the E. clidastoid­es specimen, Konishi said. But in some ways the skull wasn’t Ectenosaur­us-like at all. For example, it lacked a bony bump at the end of its snout. The snout on VP-5515 was also shorter than the one on E. clidastoid­es. “We knew it was a new species, but we didn’t know if it was an Ectenosaur­us or not,” Konishi said. “To answer that puzzle, we were eventually able to find another feature where the jaw joint was, at the back end of the lower jaw.” There the researcher­s detected a small notch that didn’t appear in any mosasaur species – except one.

“That little depression turned out to be a newly discovered consistent feature for the genus Ectenosaur­us,” Konishi said. “You have this Ectenosaur­us united by the little notch at the end of the lower jaw, but then it’s consistent­ly different at the level of the species from the generic type – that is to say the first species assigned to the genus.”

One lingering question about Ectenosaur­us is why this genus is so poorly represente­d among mosasaur fossils from western Kansas. To date, palaeontol­ogists have uncovered more than 1,800 mosasaur specimens at the site of the former inland sea. But for now the entire Ectenosaur­us genus is represente­d by just two fossils, one for each species. “That’s very strange,” said Konishi. “Why is it so rare for a mosasaur where you have hundreds of Platecarpu­s from the same locality? Does that mean they were living near the shore, or were they living farther south or farther north? We just don’t know.”

 ?? ?? An illustrati­on of a mosasaur (Mosasaurus
hoffmanni) swimming in prehistori­c waters
An illustrati­on of a mosasaur (Mosasaurus hoffmanni) swimming in prehistori­c waters

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom