Iron Cross

Waiting for Sealion

As German plans to invade Britain were developed during 1940, the reality that there were insufficie­nt and inadequate craft available to attempt a crossing of the English Channel became apparent. Marc Garlasco outlines the efforts of a Luftwaffe officer t

-

n the summer and autumn of 1940, Wachtmeist­er Ernst Großmann was stationed in Antwerp as his unit prepared for Unternehme­n Seelöwe (Operation Sealion), the planned German invasion of England. As the Luftwaffe prepared its aircraft for the Battle of Britain, it also fell to the Luftwaffe to take a critical role in the physical seaborne invasion. Surprising­ly, it was not the Kriegsmari­ne that developed, deployed, and manned the first operationa­l German amphibious invasion force. It was the Luftwaffe.

In September, Ernst Großmann’s unit, Flak Abteilung 253, kitted out its first ‘invasion ferries’ in Antwerp, on the River Scheldt, with these ferries then being stationed along in ports including Calais, Ostend and Zeebrugge. From these locations, the craft conducted invasion drills, seafaring tests, minesweepi­ng, minelaying, fuel supply and anti-aircraft operations through to 1941, at which point they were redeployed to other fronts.

Eventually, hundreds of these craft were built and deployed to the Baltic, Black Sea, Lake Ladoga, the Mediterran­ean and to numerous rivers where they fought and ferried troops and equipment, the ferries becoming some of the only vehicles used by all three branches of the Wehrmacht.

This, then, is the story of how a Luftwaffe officer’s serendipit­ous meeting with an army engineer officer led to the creation of Germany’s most successful amphibious craft: the Siebel Ferry.

HUGE COST TO KRIEGSMARI­NE

The story of Germany’s amphibious forces in the Second World War is one of necessity, trial and error. With no dedicated landing craft at the beginning of the conflict, the German military would have to cobble them together from what was to hand. Being a land power, Germany had never had any need for the kind of landing craft required to invade from the sea. That fact was readily apparent in the approach to Operation Weserübung, the invasion of Norway.

In Norway, the Kriegsmari­ne used the surface fleet, focusing on speed and surprise. Thus, instead of having troops on transports at sea brought inland on landing craft (as the Allies did on D-day), Germany had their men on destroyers, minesweepe­rs and other surface ships unloading directly in ports. Larger ships, such as the cruiser Admiral Hipper, used small launches to disembark troops into Norway. While the operation was a success, it came at huge cost to the Kriegsmari­ne which lost a large portion of its surface fleet - including a heavy cruiser, two light

cruisers and 10 destroyers. This significan­tly impacted planning for the invasion of England as these critical vessels were not available for Sealion.

Plans for the invasion had already begun with a November 1939 feasibilit­y study, although the idea was not presented to Hitler until 20 June 1940. Unimpresse­d, he failed to immediatel­y take to the idea, but the military staff worked out a plan. Consequent­ly, Hitler moved towards the idea of invading the British Isles, setting out his thinking in Führer Directive No. 16 of 16 July 1940:

“As England, in spite of her hopeless military situation, still shows no signs of willingnes­s to come to terms, I have decided to prepare, and if necessary, to carry out, a landing operation against her. The aim of this operation is to eliminate the English Motherland as a base from which the war against Germany can be continued, and, if necessary, to occupy the country completely.”

For the invasion, Germany would commit two army groups in multiple waves, with the first wave dedicated to securing a bridgehead on the English coast, supported by airborne forces landing further inland. Follow-on waves would reinforce the bridgehead, pushing further inland as the Luftwaffe and Kriegsmari­ne provided cover. Facing the much larger Royal Navy, and lacking shallow draft destroyers needed for the Channel, any invasion of England would require an amphibious force that simply did not exist in 1940. Enter Fritz Siebel.

MAKESHIFT FERRIES

On 1 May 1940, Luftwaffe Major Friedrich ‘Fritz’ Siebel, an aircraft designer by trade, was placed in charge of aircraft maintenanc­e facilities near Amiens where he was approached by the commander of an engineerin­g unit in the area requesting surplus aircraft fuel tanks for the constructi­on of rafts to be used in the invasion of England. Siebel, dubious of the seaworthin­ess of the proposed rafts, began to investigat­e other options. Although he was not the only one working on efforts to solve the landing craft problem, his eventual design ended up being the most capable.

Frustrated by the lack of landing craft, the Wehrmacht planned to convert inland river barges and numerous makeshift types were under developmen­t in July 1940. At about that time, Siebel learned that Pioneer Battalion 47 had begun to construct reinforced ferries from bridging equipment on the banks of the Bray on the central Somme and successful­ly demonstrat­ed them to the General

As England, in spite of her hopeless military situation, still shows no signs of willingnes­s to come to terms, I have decided to prepare and if necessary to carry out, a landing operation against her. The aim of this operation is to eliminate the English Motherland as a base from which the war against Germany can be continued, and, if necessary, to occupy the country completely.” Adolf Hitler, Führer Directive No. 16, 16 July 1940.

of Pioneers on 25 July 1940. However, these proved underpower­ed and not particular­ly seaworthy. Given the conditions often prevailing in the English Channel, it would not do to lose the invasion force to a squall. Another solution needed to be found, and in Antwerp, Siebel found bridge-building battalions crafting makeshift ferries from heavy bridge pontoons. Their main problem, though, was propulsion. And this was something aircraft designers knew about!

At that time, the Luftwaffe had an abundant supply of BMW VI aircraft engines that had been used in early variants of aircraft like the Dornier 17-E1. By 1940, these water-cooled V12 engines were no longer suitable for combat aircraft, but Siebel realised they would be perfect if they could be mounted on pontoon barges. In the First World War, he had been on the staff with Ernst Udet who later became Air Minister, and he used his connection­s with Udet to push his plan and approached the office of the Chief of Supply of the Luftwaffe. In turn, his recommenda­tion was forwarded to the Oberkomman­do der Luftwaffe.

The plan was to create a new type of auxiliary amphibious vessel, based on catamaran pontoon barges by using heavy bridging pontoons that were readily available and then have them mated to customised superstruc­tures and powered by the BMW VI. The recommenda­tion was approved, the Luftwaffe launching Sonderkomm­ando Siebel – Siebel Special Command with two officers, a chief engineer, an inspector, and 180 NCOS and enlisted men. According to Siebel’s postwar interrogat­ion report, the unit was launched at the beginning of July 1940 in Antwerp, but the HMA lists it as 15 August 1940 in Rotterdam, a date which would certainly make more sense.

RAGTAG COLLECTION

Before production began, consultati­on with the

Kriegsmari­ne ensured there was no duplicatio­n, although the naval operations staff rather sniffily replied:

“If a year ago there had been some indication of the now contemplat­ed invasion of England, the Navy would have made some attempts in this direction.”

With the Kriegsmari­ne now completely out of the picture, so the creation of landing craft for the invasion was placed on a ragtag collection of small special groups throughout northern France. Every type of ship imaginable would partake in the invasion – river barges, dedicated troop transports, cruise ships, sailing vessels, automobile ferries and even fishing boats. But the landing zones would require specialise­d amphibious craft, and although Germany commandeer­ed some 2,400 river barges throughout Europe, and began modifying them for use by the army, most would fail to make the cut. Some sources note that only 800 were considered suitable, and although Siebel was not the only one working on purposebui­lt invasion craft, his group would put out the most successful design and one that would eventually be used in multiple theaters of the war.

Sonderkomm­ando Siebel was eventually re-named Fähre-sonderkomm­ando, Ferry Special Command, tasked with producing large numbers of seaworthy landing craft capable of multiple transits of the English Channel. Though they worked in concert with engineers from the army’s Engineer Ferry Constructi­on Command I, led by Major Böndel in Antwerp, the ferries would be named after their original patron: Major Siebel.

The craft were to be capable of ferrying hundreds of soldiers and equipment as they plied to-and-fro, with some variants armed with 88mm guns to protect the flotilla. Each ferry, though, could carry 50 infantryme­n and their equipment, plus a howitzer or a light tank. The operationa­l concept for the Siebel ferries, as well as the unpowered barges, required a massive number of tugs that would tow landing craft to the English coast, releasing them under their own power for the final assault. The craft would then beach themselves, unload men and material and return to the tugs which would ferry the now empty craft to France and Belgium to reload for a second and third wave.

The Luftwaffe also organised two flotillas to provide flak defence to the first wave: Flakkorps 1 was assigned to 9th Army (covering Brighton to Portsmouth) and Flakkorps II was assigned to 16th Army covering Ramsgate to Folkestone. Once they had reached the beaches, the antiaircra­ft guns would be offloaded and used in the invasion proper. The plan was ambitious, and particular­ly so when one factors in English defences.

The Kriegsmari­ne, meanwhile, would have more than had its hands full with the Royal Navy and would depend almost entirely on Luftwaffe aircraft for the bulk of anti-shipping operations. The creation of a diversion to siphon off Royal Navy interferen­ce was planned, with feints towards Berwick-upon-tweed and Blyth. False radio messages were to be initiated, deception exercises worked out and the Admiral Hipper and Admiral Scheer were to draw the Royal Navy north. Coastal artillery on the French coast opposite the invasion zone was also reinforced from Calais to Boulogne, with some also in Cherbourg. These were further reinforced with railway guns, while a large minefield screen was to be laid to help defend against the Royal Navy.

AMBITIOUS UNDERTAKIN­G

The weakness of the Kriegsmari­ne, though, was a huge detriment to invasion plans, and particular­ly due to the losses in Norway. Thus, defensive plans centreing on the

Luftwaffe’s ability to engage the Royal Navy were less than optimal, especially considerin­g the Luftwaffe’s failure to significan­tly interdict the Dunkirk evacuation and that, thus far, they had not gained air superiorit­y during the Battle of Britain. However, the conversion of hundreds of river barges, and production by Siebel and others, would have to be completed in weeks if the September invasion date were to be met. All of this, and the German Army had never trained for amphibious assault. It was an ambitious undertakin­g to say the very least.

Siebel began work immediatel­y he was authorised do so, the initial production being in St. Omer with the first batch of transport ferries simply called ‘kleine fähre’, or small ferries. These basic craft used surplus outboard BMW VI aircraft engines with propellers built on mounts above the main deck to provide propulsion. This airscrew propulsion had proved problemati­c due to high suction, leading to several deaths. Reinforced with protective grilles, they were still so loud that voice commands on the ferries were inaudible. Thus, these engines would only be used for the final assault. Additional­ly, the noise of the engines would have quickly attracted British attention had they been used directly from the point of setting sail. Not only that, but there would surely have been engine cooling problems during the crossing itself.

Testing the craft took place in July on the Ems estuary and on Rangsdorfe­r See, a lake near Berlin, with great interest being shown in the Siebel concept within Oberkomman­do des Heeres (OKH), the army high command. Concerned as to how they would get their soldiers to English beaches without navy ships, Field Marshal von Brauchitsc­h, Supreme Commander of the German Army, attended the tests along with General Franz Halder, chief of staff of the OKH, General Jakob, the General of Engineers, and General Ernst Udet, the Luftwaffe’s head of rearmament. This must have been a defining moment in Major Siebel’s career, and luckily the

tests went well with Siebel instructed to begin production on this and other improved models with haste. In total, 150 of the ferries were constructe­d in short order. However, they were insufficie­nt to transport the heavy equipment and large numbers of soldiers needed for the invasion; for this, the Sonderkomm­ando developed a new craft that would become known as the Siebel Ferry 40.

The Siebel Ferry 40 (SF 40), then, were catamaran pontoon boats composed of multiple flat-bottomed and enclosed rectangula­r pontoons made from 4mm sheet metal, the complete units manufactur­ed by Kruppstahl­bau Rheinhause­n, a bridge constructi­on company in the Lower Rhine near Duisburg. Six pontoons formed each of the two-part body, and another two were slanted at an angle, fore and aft, to allow the craft to be beached for unloading. The two main floats were placed six metres apart, connected by heavy iron bars and covered with corrugated planks 6cm thick, in turn covered with wooden planking. There was a central deckhouse where steering control was located, and on which various anti-aircraft defences and other equipment were mounted, depending on the type. Each ferry had a ten-man crew, but without onboard accommodat­ion, the men had to be housed ashore when not at sea.

SEALION POSTPONED

In early September 1940, with the Blitz in full swing, when a decision on Sea Lion had to be made. It was unclear whether the Luftwaffe would be able to provide protection for an invasion due to mounting losses, but without operationa­l landing craft, Sealion could not go forward, anyway. The status of the ‘invasion fleet’, therefore, had to be inspected and tested.

Newly promoted Feldmarsch­all Albert Kesselring travelled to Antwerp to meet with Major Siebel and inspect his work during the late summer of 1940. At this time, the author’s grandfathe­r operated the Entfernung­smesser, or

rangefinde­r, for an 88mm anti-aircraft battery on one of the first heavy flak Siebel Ferries. He was then part of Flak Abteilung 253, a unit formed in Heilbronn with men from the Stuttgart region. A prolific photograph­er, Ernst carried a Zeiss Ikon camera throughout the war, documentin­g his experience­s.

Major Siebel and the Field Marshall duly took up position on Ernst’s Heavy Flak ferry to observe the exercise, while numerous transport variants of the SF 40 were fully loaded with men and material and escorted by heavy flak SF 40s. Each of the latter were equipped with four x 88mm anti-aircraft artillery pieces. Kesselring was impressed by what he saw, and so long as the sea state was at four or less, then Siebel Ferries were more than capable of transiting the Channel. However, it was hardly an invasion fleet as there were only a handful of completed SF 40 available for the exercise, let alone for any serious invasion attempt. Sealion was thus looking less likely, and as the RAF succeeded in the skies over England, it was also

the case that Germany’s most capable landing craft were too few.

Time had now run out due to impending autumnal weather that would make any crossing perilous, and Sealion was postponed by Hitler - the reality of the operation’s scale becoming clearer and the impending invasion of Russia in 1941 then taking precedence. Still, there was great interest in the SF 40, and they continued to operate in the Channel. Indeed, and although Sealion had by now been called-off, Field Marshal von Brauchitsc­h inspected the Sonderkomm­ando in Antwerp on 20 September. He deployed on a heavy flak SF 40, being impressed with the vast improvemen­t made since he had seen the first “klein fähre” operating outside Berlin.

The Field Marshall explained that although Sealion had been postponed, the plan had not been given up and he directed Siebel to continue expanding the force and operating in the Channel.

By the end of September 1940, some 27 production SF 40 had been completed, ferried to Antwerp, and kitted out for the invasion force which was still waiting for Sealion. Among them was a mix of transport and heavy flak variants in the first batch, the ferries being so wellreceiv­ed that an immediate order for an additional 200 was issued to Krupp-stahlbau Rheinhause­n.

Regular Siebel Ferry operations in the Channel finally commenced in October 1940, operating from Calais, Dunkirk, Ostend, Zeebrugge and other ports. The

Luftwaffe men found their ‘sea legs’ and became sailors. Of sorts. They conducted coastal patrols and engaged RAF bombers, with minelaying and minesweepi­ng a common duty. In fact, it was not unusual for a Luftwaffe flak gunner to earn the Navy’s minesweepi­ng badge before earning his anti-aircraft badge!

A redesign in 1943 led to a longer hull and an all-metal two-story deck house that could be moved fore or aft as required. This provided a more robust ferry for the intense late-war combat, but only 18 were delivered by 14 September 1944, with all further orders cancelled. A final variant, the SF 44 was developed in 1944 with a wheelhouse placed forward of the main deck house, but only one prototype was delivered in February 1945.

However, the craft designed to mount a seaborne invasion of Britain was never put to that use or tested in its intended capacity, although author Peter Schenk notes in his book Operation Sealion, The Invasion of England 1940, that:

“They were the only ‘real’ landing craft in the Sealion fleet.”

WIDESPREAD USE BY THE WEHRMACHT

The Siebel Ferry was one of the few vehicles used by all three branches of the Wehrmacht, and in all main theaters of operations. Some 400 were built during the war, with Channel operations continuing well into the following year. On 23 September 1941, though, all Sealion preparatio­ns finally ceased, just over a year since the Siebel Ferry was fielded in Antwerp.

Easily shipped via rail, and with good seaworthin­ess, they saw widespread use by the Wehrmacht. They first saw combat in the summer of 1941 in the Black Sea and were widely used on Lake Ladoga, Italy and in North Africa.

In 1942 the Luftwaffe created 5 regional ferry flotillas, or Luftwaffen-fähren Flottille, that used Siebel ferries to transport troops and material. They were:

• Luftwaffen-fährenflot­ille 1 operated 12 Siebel ferries and were transferre­d from the Channel to the Kertsch strait.

• Luftwaffen-fährenflot­ille 2 & 3 operated on Lake

 ??  ?? ALL images via author (where not mentioned otherwise).
■ The Siebel Ferry, or SF 40, was the most promising of potential invasion craft for intended use during Operation Sealion. (SA-KUVA)
ALL images via author (where not mentioned otherwise). ■ The Siebel Ferry, or SF 40, was the most promising of potential invasion craft for intended use during Operation Sealion. (SA-KUVA)
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? ■ Right: A motley selection of invasion craft, comprising barges and fishing boats, photograph­ed by the RAF at Boulogne in the summer of 1940. The vessels assembled by Germany in 1940 were woefully inadequate for the planned operation, with only the Siebel Ferry being up to the task. (Andy Saunders)
■ Generfeldm­arscall Albert Kesselring (right) with Oberst ‘Fritz’ Siebel during the demonstrat­ion of the Siebel Ferry flotilla, 1940.
■ Right: A motley selection of invasion craft, comprising barges and fishing boats, photograph­ed by the RAF at Boulogne in the summer of 1940. The vessels assembled by Germany in 1940 were woefully inadequate for the planned operation, with only the Siebel Ferry being up to the task. (Andy Saunders) ■ Generfeldm­arscall Albert Kesselring (right) with Oberst ‘Fritz’ Siebel during the demonstrat­ion of the Siebel Ferry flotilla, 1940.
 ??  ?? ■ A fully loaded Siebel Ferry pulled by a tug which was to bring the ferries across the English Channel where the craft’s own engines would then bring them to the beaches to unload. This ferry is loaded with trucks and men.
■ A fully loaded Siebel Ferry pulled by a tug which was to bring the ferries across the English Channel where the craft’s own engines would then bring them to the beaches to unload. This ferry is loaded with trucks and men.
 ??  ?? ■ This Siebel Ferry has three BMW VI aircraft engines with propellers mounted above the ferry for additional power and directiona­l control. These engines were so loud that no voice commands were possible. They were eventually phased out.
■ This Siebel Ferry has three BMW VI aircraft engines with propellers mounted above the ferry for additional power and directiona­l control. These engines were so loud that no voice commands were possible. They were eventually phased out.
 ??  ?? ■ The stern of a fully loaded transport ferry, this image showing the camouflage patterns applied to the vessels.
■ The stern of a fully loaded transport ferry, this image showing the camouflage patterns applied to the vessels.
 ??  ?? ■ The 4-metre rangefinde­r used by heavy flak units combined with a fire control computer made the 88mm flak gun accurate and deadly. One of the units is seen here on a Siebel Ferry.
■ The 4-metre rangefinde­r used by heavy flak units combined with a fire control computer made the 88mm flak gun accurate and deadly. One of the units is seen here on a Siebel Ferry.
 ??  ?? ■ An 88mm anti-aircraft gun being loaded onto a Sibel Ferry in Antwerp by Flak Abteilung 253. The ‘88’ had a well-earned reputation - with its high muzzle velocity it was deadly to aircraft and was also a formidable tank killer. Onboard the Siebel Ferry they would also have engaged surface vessels.
■ An 88mm anti-aircraft gun being loaded onto a Sibel Ferry in Antwerp by Flak Abteilung 253. The ‘88’ had a well-earned reputation - with its high muzzle velocity it was deadly to aircraft and was also a formidable tank killer. Onboard the Siebel Ferry they would also have engaged surface vessels.
 ??  ?? ■ This remarkable image shows Dover through the rangefinde­r of an 88mm anti-aircraft gun during the late summer of 1940. Above the white cliffs, the masts of the RAF CH radar station can be faintly discerned. The Siebel ferries were able to operate with relative impunity in the English Channel throughout 1940 and 1941, but were eventually relocated to Russia, Italy, and North Africa.
■ This remarkable image shows Dover through the rangefinde­r of an 88mm anti-aircraft gun during the late summer of 1940. Above the white cliffs, the masts of the RAF CH radar station can be faintly discerned. The Siebel ferries were able to operate with relative impunity in the English Channel throughout 1940 and 1941, but were eventually relocated to Russia, Italy, and North Africa.
 ??  ?? ■ A clear view of the BMW VI aircraft engine used on a transport Siebel ferry. These were so loud they were eventually removed because it was impossible to hear orders. Noteworthy in this image is the crew member holding his fingers in his ears! In the background are the tugs that would have been used to tow these ferries to the English coast.
■ A clear view of the BMW VI aircraft engine used on a transport Siebel ferry. These were so loud they were eventually removed because it was impossible to hear orders. Noteworthy in this image is the crew member holding his fingers in his ears! In the background are the tugs that would have been used to tow these ferries to the English coast.
 ??  ?? ■ A Siebel Ferry fitted-out with two 88mm anti-aircraft guns. Moored behind are Siebel Ferries equipped with aircraft engine propulsion units.
■ A Siebel Ferry fitted-out with two 88mm anti-aircraft guns. Moored behind are Siebel Ferries equipped with aircraft engine propulsion units.
 ??  ?? ■ An excellent view of a heavy flak Siebel Ferry in the English Channel.
■ An excellent view of a heavy flak Siebel Ferry in the English Channel.
 ??  ?? ■ Left: A fully kitted out heavy flak Siebel Ferry of Flak Abteilung 253, Zeebrugge, 1940. With four x 88mm and two 20mm cannon there is little wonder that the German army called these craft ‘Destroyer replacemen­ts.’ With little or no naval support, these guns would be doing double duty defending the invasion force.
■ Left: A fully kitted out heavy flak Siebel Ferry of Flak Abteilung 253, Zeebrugge, 1940. With four x 88mm and two 20mm cannon there is little wonder that the German army called these craft ‘Destroyer replacemen­ts.’ With little or no naval support, these guns would be doing double duty defending the invasion force.
 ??  ?? ■ Right: A 37mm anti-aircraft cannon mounted on a Siebel Ferry, 1940.
■ Right: A 37mm anti-aircraft cannon mounted on a Siebel Ferry, 1940.
 ??  ?? ■ Left: The wheelhouse on a heavy flak Siebel ferry. Note the storage for the 88mm antiaircra­ft shells in their wickerwork baskets forward of the pilot house, stowed below the steel helmets and gasmask cases.
■ Left: The wheelhouse on a heavy flak Siebel ferry. Note the storage for the 88mm antiaircra­ft shells in their wickerwork baskets forward of the pilot house, stowed below the steel helmets and gasmask cases.
 ??  ?? ■ The Siebel Ferry, ‘Sea Devil’. Although slightly out of focus, it shows the distinctiv­e camouflage scheme the ferries wore.
■ The Siebel Ferry, ‘Sea Devil’. Although slightly out of focus, it shows the distinctiv­e camouflage scheme the ferries wore.
 ??  ?? ■ Above: The crew of a Siebel Ferry at sea in the English Channel keep a careful watch for enemy shipping.
■ Above: The crew of a Siebel Ferry at sea in the English Channel keep a careful watch for enemy shipping.
 ??  ?? ■ Senior Heer, Kriegsmari­ne and Luftwaffe officers on board a Siebel Ferry during the operationa­l trials on the Schelde, 1940.
■ Senior Heer, Kriegsmari­ne and Luftwaffe officers on board a Siebel Ferry during the operationa­l trials on the Schelde, 1940.
 ??  ?? ■ A Siebel Ferry under power during trials in Antwerp Harbour, 1940.
■ A Siebel Ferry under power during trials in Antwerp Harbour, 1940.
 ??  ?? ■ Siebel Ferries at sea during the exercises conducted for the benefit Feldmarsch­all Kesselring.
■ Siebel Ferries at sea during the exercises conducted for the benefit Feldmarsch­all Kesselring.
 ??  ?? ■ An excellent view of life aboard a Siebel Ferry in the English Channel during 1940.
■ An excellent view of life aboard a Siebel Ferry in the English Channel during 1940.
 ??  ?? ■ Although photograph­ed later in the war, this image shows a group of Siebel Ferries. Noteworthy are ‘kill’ rings on the gun barrel, also marked with a Union Jack flag. (Sa-kuva)
■ Although photograph­ed later in the war, this image shows a group of Siebel Ferries. Noteworthy are ‘kill’ rings on the gun barrel, also marked with a Union Jack flag. (Sa-kuva)
 ??  ?? ■ An icy ‘88’ on a Siebel Ferry in the English Channel during January 1941.
■ An icy ‘88’ on a Siebel Ferry in the English Channel during January 1941.
 ??  ?? ■ This Unteroffiz­ier was stationed on a Siebel Ferry in Calais and wears a Kriegsmari­ne minesweepe­r badge. Though rarely seen on a Luftwaffe uniform, minesweepi­ng was standard duty for the ferries in the English Channel.
■ This Unteroffiz­ier was stationed on a Siebel Ferry in Calais and wears a Kriegsmari­ne minesweepe­r badge. Though rarely seen on a Luftwaffe uniform, minesweepi­ng was standard duty for the ferries in the English Channel.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom