Kentish Express Ashford & District

‘Ashford Shard’ on hold amid design fears

- By Charlie Harman charman@thekmgroup.co.uk

A 16-storey apartment complex dubbed the ‘Ashford Shard’ has been put on hold over design fears.

Councillor­s discussed the bold proposal at a virtual planning committee meeting last Wednesday night, eventually deferring the scheme so the developer can investigat­e a list of concerns.

These worries chiefly dealt with design, lack of affordable property and insufficie­nt environmen­tal considerat­ions.

The 223-home developmen­t earmarked for constructi­on on the former HomePlus Furniture site in Beaver Road - would see nine townhouses and two apartment blocks built as well as a rooftop restaurant, three commercial units and offices.

None of the units would be classed as affordable housing, with a contributi­on being sought for the off-site council purchase of such social housing.

The plan is being led by the council’s own property company, A Better Choice for Property Ltd, which bought the site from the Southern Housing Group, and would have featured one of the town’s tallest buildings if approved.

However, it wasn’t the height of the 16-storey tower block that worried councillor­s but the

“missed opportunit­y” to create a landmark structure for visitors arriving at the nearby Ashford Internatio­nal railway station.

Labour’s Cllr Diccon Spain, who represents the Bockhanger ward, said: “We have some not very outstandin­g architectu­re in terms of previous decades’ tall buildings and now we have a building that’ll be right next to the station, it’s the first thing people will see coming off the train and what we have - and I’m not going to hold back my words on the design - is an ugly building, really an ugly building.

“I’m afraid to say you can put any kind of cladding on a pig and it’s still a pig.

“The people of Ashford deserve better than a building that has almost zero architectu­ral merit, it’s just completely a missed opportunit­y.”

These words were echoed by Conservati­ve councillor Bernard Heyes, who represents the Repton ward.

“I can’t see hardly any architectu­ral merit in these basically hideous flats whatsoever,” he said.

“The 16-storey tower block is positively grotesque, I think it’s awful.

“If you’re going to have a high building, which I don’t really think’s appropriat­e at that height in that area, you could have something better.”

He also questioned the need for more one-bedroom apartments in the town centre, which would comprise 66 of the new dwellings.

Cllr Heyes seconded a motion to refuse the proposal outright tabled by Ashford Labour leader Cllr Brendan Chilton, who was “very disappoint­ed” to see the design of what he said would be “a showpiece of Ashford”.

The council officer responded that a “rigorous design process” had been undertaken by the contracted architects, having looked into the town’s heritage and architectu­re to inform their design.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? The tallest block of the developmen­t, visualised from Victoria Road in this image, would be 16 storeys tall
The tallest block of the developmen­t, visualised from Victoria Road in this image, would be 16 storeys tall
 ??  ?? An image of the how the scheme could look from the railway station
An image of the how the scheme could look from the railway station

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom