Kentish Gazette Canterbury & District
Car charging points used just four times in a year
Exclusive
lstafford@thekmgroup.co.uk ers’ Alliance, which branded it a “green vanity project”.
Campaign manager Eleanor McGrath said: “Only a small number of drivers will ever use this scheme that mostly suits those who only need to travel short distances, but everyone is stuck paying for it.
“The council must explain why so much tax payers’ cash was blown on this project when there was such little demand for it.”
Hersden resident Howard Myers agreed, comparing the purchase to “throwing public money down the drain” at a time of severe cuts.
He said: “Canterbury City Council should have found out from the DVLA how many electric cars were registered in Kent, and in particular the Canterbury area first before spending £15,000 on chargers.”
But the city council’s head of planning and regeneration, Ian Brown, says people are more likely to buy an electric car if there are local charging points.
He said: “We expect the market for the cars to grow in the years ahead as people gain more confidence in the technology and the cost of the cars comes down. This was always a plan for the longterm future.”
Meanwhi le, Kent has received an additional £37 million in national funding to increase the number of charging points for the eco-friendly cars.
Kent County Council is expected to use the cash to create a further 75 publicly accessible stations, but it is not yet known if any more are destined for Canterbury.
The city’s remaining charge points, which are based in New Dover Road and Sturry Road, require a special card to use and are free for drivers of eco-friendly cars.
The DVLA says there is no need for an expansive network of public charging points, because most charging takes place either at the owner’s home or workplace.
However, it says some charging points are necessary to ensure drivers can top up when travelling longer distances, which is one of the biggest turn-offs for buying an electric car.