Kentish Gazette Canterbury & District

Court victory paves way for 4,000 homes - but legal battle not over

- By Gerry Warren gwarren@thekmgroup.co.uk

Campaigner­s have lost a bid at the Court of Appeal to thwart the proposed 4,000-home Mountfield Park developmen­t in south Canterbury over air quality fears.

Judges this week backed a previous High Court decision which rejected the claim that the Secretary of State had failed in his duty to call in the applicatio­n for deliberati­on because of environmen­tal concerns.

Because of the protracted legal battle, not a single brick has been laid since planning permission for the scheme was granted in 2016, and the council has yet to issue the formal approval notice.

But the hopes of developer Corinthian Land and the city council that long-overdue building work can now start may still be premature.

Because protestors have already indicated they may now seek permission to take the judicial review to the Supreme Court and are likely to also challenge the planning approval notice when it is released.

The action, brought by environmen­talists Emily Shirley and Michael Rundell, has been paid for with a £15,000 fighting fund backed by supporters and sympatheti­c lawyers. But Corinthian­s claim the two-year delay has already cost the company millions.

Countering complaints, including those from the developer and the city council, that the legal challenges were denying families much-needed new homes, Mrs Shirley said: “I think it is much more important that people already living here are not breathing in dangerous air pollution.

“There is no point in just keep building more and houses if people are being poisoned.

“It’s ridiculous and needs to be addressed.

“I don’t think people grasp how dangerous it is to general health - and that is what the science says, not us.”

Although the city council granted planning permission for the developmen­t two years ago, the formal notice was never issued because of the legal challenge.

During the delays, the developer says it has taken the opportunit­y to enhance the scheme’s ‘green credential­s’, which are expected to be presented to the planning authority in an update to the existing planning applicatio­n in the near future.

Corinthian says it will contain further measures, including more green travel opportunit­ies and facilities, to mitigate air pollution caused by the predicted thousands of extra vehicle movements, especially in and out of Canterbury.

But even if they are approved by the city council, Mrs Shirley and Mr Rundell say they may still challenge that decision, sparking a new lengthy round of legal wrangling.

The pair also have a separate legal challenge ongoing against the city council’s Local Plan, which they say fails to adequately tackle air quality across the district.

It was put on hold while the action against the Secretary of State was determined.

Mrs Shirley said: “We are disappoint­ed by the Court of Appeal decision because it is not a rational conclusion and does not stand up to scrutiny.” n What do you think? Email kentishgaz­ette@thekmgroup. co.uk

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom