Leicester Mercury

Setting record straight on hospitals proposals

-

WE are writing in response to the article published under the headline “Campaigner­s battle £450m hospital revamp plans”, (Mercury, October 20) and particular­ly to set the record straight on the assertion we have not considered Covid-19 when thinking about this investment in our local hospitals.

We recognise the world has changed, for everyone, not just the NHS.

One of the only certaintie­s being that we will be living with increased uncertaint­y for a long time.

That being the case it is tempting for organisati­ons to shelve plans, put off decisions and hunker down, in the hope the future becomes more certain or that someone comes along to tell them what to do.

We think that is the wrong approach, especially now when we consider all that we have learnt in planning for, and dealing with, the impact of the first wave.

So, at the heart of the our clinical strategy (which drives the £450 million reconfigur­ation plan) is the desire to focus emergency and specialist care at the Royal and the Glenfield hospitals and separate non-emergency care from emergency care so that when we are very busy those patients waiting for routine operations are not delayed or cancelled because we have had to prioritise an influx of emergency patients.

More recently, we have asked ‘Does this still make sense when we look at what the pandemic has taught us?’ The short answer is yes, and these are the reasons.

INTENSIVE CARE

One of the biggest challenges we faced preparing for the first Covid peak was to create enough adult Intensive Care Unit (ICU) capacity.

In steady state we have 50 ICU beds. The initial pandemic modelling suggested that we would require closer to 300 beds.

Which was a daunting ask of our clinical teams.

Nonetheles­s, within a fortnight we had a plan to increase our capacity in line with the peak, largely as a result of converting every available space with the right oxygen supply into makeshift ICUs and by suspending children’s heart surgery so that we could convert children’s ICU into adult ICU.

Thankfully, largely as a result of the success of lockdown halting the spread of the virus, the peak was not as pronounced as we had first expected and we had, at the highest peak, 64 patients in intensive care.

In our reconfigur­ation plans we have said that we will create two Super ICUs at the Royal and the Glenfield, doubling our capacity to over 100 ICU beds.

Had these been in place at the time of the pandemic our response would have been very different. We would have had enough ICU capacity with plenty to spare.

CHILDREN’S HEART SURGERY

As mentioned above, we knew Covid would require us to care for very many more adult patients on ICU.

Mercifully, children were less affected by the virus.

With limited ICU capacity we therefore took the difficult decision to halt children’s heart surgery in Leicester, transfer those children awaiting their operation to Birmingham Children’s Hospital and convert the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit at Glenfield into an adult ICU.

On balance, we took the decision based on what would save the most lives, knowing our children would still have their surgery, albeit not in Leicester, and as a consequenc­e we could care for more of the terribly sick adults whose only hope was sedation and ventilatio­n.

However, in our reconfigur­ation plans we are going to create a standalone Children’s Hospital at the Royal – the first phase completes in spring 2021.

Had the Children’s Hospital been built we would have been able to continue with heart surgery during Covid knowing the children were safe in a standalone hospital with a totally separate ICU.

CANCER AND ELECTIVE OPERATIONS

Locally and nationally, patients who had been previously listed for operations and procedures were cancelled in very large numbers as hospitals made preparatio­ns for the pandemic.

This affected all services and all types of patients, even some with cancer.

The only surgery we were able to continue was for those emergency cases that without an operation within 24 to 72 hours would have been likely to die.

In terms of cancer cases where patients are often immuno-compromise­d, there was the added concern about bringing them into a hospital with positive Covid patients and the impact that this could have if, in their already poorly state they picked up the virus.

In our reconfigur­ation plans we are going to build a standalone treatment centre at Glenfield Hospital. This will be a new hospital next to the existing hospital.

It fulfils our desire to separate emergency and elective procedures.

Meaning that when we are busy with high numbers of emergencie­s, our elective patients still receive care. Had this been in place by the time of the pandemic we would have been able to maintain significan­t amount of our non-emergency work and create a Covid clean site.

IMPACT ON STAFF

Even before the pandemic we regularly struggled to effectivel­y staff our services.

The fact we have three separate hospitals with the duplicatio­n and triplicati­on of services that entails means we often have to spread our staff too thinly in order to cover clinical rotas.

During the first peak of Covid we had 20 per cent sickness across all staff groups meaning that one in five staff were either sick or isolating.

It is a testimony to all our staff that despite this we kept going. But it is unsustaina­ble in the long-term.

Once reconfigur­ed, we will no longer have to run triplicate rotas for staff on three hospital sites.

For example, with two super ICUs rather than the current three smaller ones we would have been able to consolidat­e our staffing, making it easier to cover absences when they occurred and perhaps even give staff the time to decompress after repeat days of long and harrowing shifts. Overall, it is clear to us that had the timing been different our hospitals would have been better able to cope with Covid-19 in their reconfigur­ed state and our patients would have received a better, safer service. Finally, we should make clear that we have no interest in the politics of all this but we do think that people need the NHS now, more than ever, and as such the NHS has a duty to be the best it can be in a Covid endemic world.

That is why we are recommendi­ng these plans to your readers… and we would encourage them to take part in the consultati­on to share their hopes and aspiration­s for their NHS. Andrew Furlong, medical director and children’s orthopaedi­c surgeon, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Carolyn Fox, chief nurse, hospitals trust Professor Azhar Farooqi, GP and clinical chair, Leicester, Leicesters­hire and Rutland clinical commission­ing groups (CCGs) Professor Mayur Lakhani, GP and clinical chairman, CCGs Caroline Trevithick, chief nurse and executive director of nursing, quality and performanc­e, CCGs

 ??  ?? PLANNED: How the front of the infirmary could look
PLANNED: How the front of the infirmary could look

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom