Leicester Mercury

Homes plan for fields on village edge is rejected

- By NICK DAWSON nicholas.dawson@reachplc.com

INDUSTRIAL ESTATE ALSO REFUSED AS APPEAL IS DISMISSED

ROLLING fields on the edge of Burbage have been protected from developmen­t after controvers­ial plans for 140 homes and an industrial developmen­t have been thrown out.

More than 160 residents objected to the proposal from Barwood Developmen­t Securities for the large housing estate and up to 30,000 sq m of warehousin­g, between Sketchley Grange Hotel and the A5.

The plans were considered by Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council in May last year and refused over concerns it would destroy a green corridor and increase traffic pressure on the A5.

The scheme was then taken to appeal but this has now been dismissed, following a nine-day inquiry.

In his report on the decision, inspector John Woolcock said: “The most significan­t adverse effect weighing against the proposal is the effect on the character and appearance of the area.

“The adverse impacts would significan­tly and demonstrab­ly outweigh the benefits.”

Mr Woolcock cited the emerging Burbage Neighbourh­ood Plan among other local planning frameworks which jarred with the proposals conflicted.

Several parish councillor­s gave evidence as part of the inquiry, highlighti­ng the harm they feared the developmen­t would cause to Burbage and its residents.

Parish councillor Maureen Lynch said: “The preparatio­n of the evidence of the harms this developmen­t would deliver was a tremendous team effort between parish councillor­s and all five borough councillor­s who contribute­d to capturing the relevant points for the inquiry.

“Parish councillor­s are relieved that the planning appeal has been dismissed.”

Documents filed with the original applicatio­n said the 37-acre developmen­t would have created more than 500 jobs.

An appeal was recently rejected for a scheme for a large solar farm near Bosworth Battlefiel­d, over concerns it would have a “significan­t adverse impact” on the character of the area.

The inspector said in their report that the 153-acre energy complex would spoil views from the battlefiel­d.

The 35MW power complex would have been capable of generating electricit­y for more than 10,000 homes a year. It would have been in place for 30 years and would have offset 570,000 carbon tonnes throughout its lifetime.

 ?? SKETCHLEYL­ANE SKETCHLEY MEADOWS INDUSTRIAL ESTATE SKETCHLEY GRANGE HOTEL ?? REFUSED: Plans included an estate of 140 homes and an area of industrial units
SKETCHLEYL­ANE SKETCHLEY MEADOWS INDUSTRIAL ESTATE SKETCHLEY GRANGE HOTEL REFUSED: Plans included an estate of 140 homes and an area of industrial units

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom