Loughborough Echo

Matthews paid out £56k to axed committee’s members

THEIR UNFAIR DISMISSAL CLAIM WAS SETTLED WITH NO ADMISSION OF LIABILITY

- By HANNAH RICHARDSON hannah.richardson@reachplc.com @HRichardso­nLDR

LEICESTERS­HIRE’S police and crime commission­er (PCC) paid out £56,000 in compensati­on after members of his ethics committee claimed they had been dismissed unfairly.

Conservati­ve PCC Rupert Matthews disbanded the seven-strong ethics, integrity and complaints committee and replaced it with a new ethics and transparen­cy panel.

The members of the group then filed a claim for unfair dismissal and Mr Matthews paid each of them £8,000 in a settlement that did not include an admission of liability.

His Labour predecesso­r, Lord (Willy) Bach, criticised the dismissal as “outrageous”, claiming Mr Matthews sacked them because “he didn’t like their questions and criticism”.

But Mr Matthews has said he felt the previous committee was not focused enough and he decided to replace them with a new panel that was more in line with his police and crime plan.

He claimed he invited all seven former members to put their names forward to sit on the new group.

He said: “I recognise that they felt aggrieved by the dissolutio­n of the committee on which they sat, but find it very disappoint­ing that as former members of a committee focused on ethics and integrity, they felt it appropriat­e to seek financial recompense from the public purse.

“The committee met four times a year at most and obviously I did not believe the voluntary committee had any employment status.

“It is, of course, regrettabl­e that this situation arose and while I would have preferred matters to have been settled without financial recourse, I saw no point in prolonging things any further.

“Therefore, to curtail the financial cost of taking this matter to a tribunal which would have hinged on a legal technicali­ty, it was felt that a financial settlement for each member was the most economical­ly expedient option. I would like to make it absolutely clear that my decision to wind-up the former committee had nothing to do with political allegiance­s, or challenge to my approach.

“It is worth noting that I previously stated my thanks to the chair and other members of the ethics, integrity and complaints committee for their work and commitment during my predecesso­rs’ terms of office.

“I am also disappoint­ed that no former members applied to join my newly constitute­d ethics and transparen­cy panel, which I invited them to do.

“My new panel has agreed stronger, more targeted and incisive terms of reference to deliver detailed and meaningful scrutiny of the force on behalf of all the communitie­s of Leicester, Leicesters­hire and Rutland. This, I believe will help me drive up trust and confidence in the police, which has been deteriorat­ing nationally in recent years.

“While of course the financial impact of this will be included in the annual statement of accounts, for complete transparen­cy I can confirm that each member of the committee received £8,000.”

 ?? ?? DECISION: Police and crime commission­er Rupert Matthews
DECISION: Police and crime commission­er Rupert Matthews

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom