What is the true cost of using a cheaper alternative?
28 identical divorce petitions from online company dismissed by the court
As solicitors we often get asked why our fees are higher than some online services that claim to help petitioners draft a divorce
SHWLWLRQ IRU D VPDOO ࡼ[HG IHH
We appreciate that divorce and the dissolution of a civil partnership can be an
H[SHQVLYH SURFHVV HVSHFLDOO\
as the divorce Court fee has
LQFUHDVHG IURP e WR e
Our response to this question is that most solicitors are specialised which means we only advise
LQ RQH RU WZR DUHDV RI ODZ
This increases our knowledge
DQG DUHD RI H[SHUWLVH ZKLFK
can in turn reduce time and
VWUHVV LQ DFKLHYLQJ D VROXWLRQ
With a deeper knowledge of case law, we can navigate to Court proceedings and anticipate what a judge may or may not order before a
KHDULQJ ,I UHTXLUHG ZH FDQ
begin strategising from an early stage – family decisions are based on case and statute
ODZ DV VXFK ZH FDQ RಀHU
tailored advice to ensure that your divorce petition can proceed and be accepted by
WKH &RXUW
A recent High Court case has highlighted the risks associated with using
FKHDSHU DOWHUQDWLYHV ,Q
Re Yorston and others (Matrimonial Causes Act 1973: Improper Petitions) [2021] EWFC 80, the Court had to consider 28 divorce petitions that contained identical particulars of claims relying
RQ ȅXQUHDVRQDEOH EHKDYLRXUȆ
The 28 clients had all used the same service
SURYLGH E\ L'LYRUFHV ,W ZDV
established that iDivorces had sent out standard workings to each client rather than
VSHFLࡼF ZRUNLQJV UHODWLQJ WR WKH FOLHQWȆV GLYRUFH FDVH ,Q WKH VWDQGDUG ZRUNLQJV
iDivorces simply asked the
FOLHQW WR FRQࡼUP LI DQ\ RI
WKH GHWDLOV ZHUH LQFRUUHFW
7KLV UHVXOWHG LQ GLಀHUHQW
divorce petitions being sent to the court, each one relying on the same facts in relation to
EHKDYLRXU
The High Court held that these petitions were improper and each petitioner must provide their own reasons for relying on the fact
RI EHKDYLRXU 7KH UHDVRQV
relied on must be true and the behaviour cited must
KDYH RFFXUUHG 7KH UHVXOW ZDV
that these divorce petitions were dismissed, delaying the divorce process for all 28 clients, causing further stress,
WLPH DQG FRVW WR HDFK SDUW\
The current divorce process states that there is one ground for divorce and this is irretrievable
EUHDNGRZQ RI PDUULDJH $V
the petitioner, you will need
WR UHO\ RQ RQH RI ࡼYH IDFWV WR
show that the marriage has irretrievably broken down,
these are:
1. One party has acted so unreasonably that the RWKHU FDQQRW EH H[SHFWHG to live with them;
2. One party has committed adultery (although this fact cannot be relied on when dissolving a civil partnership);
3. The 2 years’ separation with consent of the party;
4. 5 years’ separation;
5. 'HVHUWLRQ
There will be a change in divorce law providing for “no-fault” divorce which is due to come into force in April 2022 and will remove the necessity of considering
SDUWLFXODUV 8QWLO WKH QHZ law comes into force, the current law requires the petitioner to prove their
FDVH
This publication is a general summary of the
ODZ ,W VKRXOG QRW UHSODFH legal advice tailored to your
VSHFLࡼF FLUFXPVWDQFHV