Maidenhead Advertiser

Getting the measure of council climate action

-

I read Adrian Williams’ enlighteni­ng article (‘Climate fears as plan is approved’, November 25) following the full council vote on particulat­es measuremen­t, with interest and incredulit­y in equal measure.

Why would RBWM vote to NOT measure PM2.5 particulat­es and to NOT increase measuremen­ts of PM10 particulat­es despite recent advice from the WHO and guidance issued to Directors of Public Health?

I believe that RBWM does not take air pollution at all seriously and cannot understand why it does so little to improve air quality for the people it serves; actually measuring particulat­e levels properly would be a good start. ‘No Idling’ signs near schools would be good too.

The council’s leader, Andrew Johnson, is reported to have said ‘new guidelines on particulat­e matter look close to impossible to deliver’.

This is an astonishin­g response!

Is this justificat­ion for not taking action? In case readers missed it, the target achievemen­t date for PM10 particulat­es as defined in the National Air Quality Objectives was 17 years ago!

The target for PM2.5 particulat­es is a 15 per cent reduction to be achieved between 2010 and 2020.

RBWM declared its first Air Quality Management Area in 2004.

Well, I think that the council’s time’s up! For the record, RBWM measures PM10 particulat­es at one, single site and does not measure PM2.5 particulat­es at all.

Word is that RBWM cannot afford to do it. Our air quality may actually be far worse than we know because RBWM is not measuring levels of the things which are known to cause us great harm.

Perhaps someone from RBWM could respond and enlighten residents of the

Royal Borough?

Air pollution affects us all.

I will be following this issue closely and will vote accordingl­y at the next local elections! THOMAS WIGLEY

Windsor

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom