Maidenhead Advertiser

Worry over harm to important wildlife

All areas: Assessment cites woodland and firecrest ‘destructio­n’

- By Shay Bottomley shayb@baylismedi­a.co.uk @ShayB_BM

Campaigner­s against developmen­t on Maidenhead Golf Course have expressed their concern after an environmen­tal assessment said the plans for 2,000 homes on the site could lead to the ‘destructio­n’ of protected species.

An environmen­tal impact assessment scoping opinion commission­ed by CALA Homes added that the site, which is also set to see two schools and a community hub, could lead to the permanent loss of ‘woodland of high ecological value’.

The document has been prepared ahead of the planned developmen­t on land which was taken out of the greenbelt with the adoption of the Borough Local Plan on February 8 this year.

During constructi­on, the scoping document reveals potential effects during constructi­on to include ‘damage via machinery incursion, pollution and spillages/runoff on retained habitats on or adjacent to the site including ancient woodland’, as well as disturbanc­e to bats and the ‘destructio­n of badger setts and/or killing/injury of badgers during site clearance and constructi­on works’.

Moreover, nesting and young birds could also be ‘destroyed’ in site clearance works, including the potential disturbanc­e of Schedule 1 protected bird species such as firecrest.

During the ‘operationa­l phase’, potential effects include the ‘permanent loss of habitats’ for a number of species, as well as damage from recreation­al pressures such as path erosion and trampling.

Tina Quadrino, chair of the Maidenhead Great Park group, said: “This planning document confirms many of our fears about the environmen­tal destructio­n planned for this vital area of publicly owned open space in our town. But it also down-plays the ecological value of the land, for example by not acknowledg­ing how much of the land is woodland. Twenty-two hectares of the

55-hectare site is woodland, of which two hectares is ancient woodland. And the council has refused to put Tree Protection Orders on any of the trees.

“As well as damaging our ecological environmen­t, this assessment also makes it clear that the people of Maidenhead will effectivel­y be living in a massive building site for the next 10 to 15 years, with significan­tly increased constructi­on traffic, and the air, noise and light pollution this brings with it.

“The document also reminds us that our council, as both landowner and planning authority, will to a large extent be marking their own homework when it comes to the planning applicatio­n for this site.

“As well as being concerned about the permanent loss of woodland of high ecological value, the threats to protected species, increased air pollution, increases in traffic both during the constructi­on phase and operationa­l phase of the developmen­t, the loss of open space, we are also very concerned about the loss of water storage, increased pressure on water supplies, increased run-off from the concreting over of greenspace and increased pressure on our already stretched local health services.”

 ?? ?? Rushington Copse, woodland at Maidenhead Golf Course. Ref:134442-30
Rushington Copse, woodland at Maidenhead Golf Course. Ref:134442-30

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom