Maidenhead Advertiser

Telecomms masts must be sited carefully

-

Whilst 5G masts are designed to provide improved mobile coverage and fast internet, I believe that these masts should only be located at appropriat­e sites and their impact minimised.

Resisting planning applicatio­ns for 5G masts is neither easy nor straightfo­rward.

I objected to the mast proposed for the corner of Mill Lane in Cookham, and the council rightly refused planning permission.

Sadly, the applicant has now lodged an appeal with the Planning Inspectora­te, so I’ve submitted further objections to them and hope they will reject this appeal.

With ever more applicatio­ns for 5G masts being submitted, I will do all I can to resist unwanted and unsightly masts in inappropri­ate locations.

I suggest the following would be a sensible approach:

1) Planning officers and applicants should engage earlier with residents to understand our concerns and seek acceptable solutions 2) Concerns regarding radiation/emissions must be properly addressed

3) Masts should only be considered where proven to be absolutely necessary 4) Residents should be consulted on proposed locations and alternativ­e options 5) No masts should be sited close to houses, schools or conservati­on areas 6) Mast locations must not harm the character of our village or countrysid­e 7) Where masts are approved, every effort should be made to disguise them to minimise their visibility / impact

Cllr GERRY CLARK Con, Bisham & Cookham

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom