Maidenhead Advertiser

In the frame for ‘parroted’ letters

- By Shay Bottomley shayb@baylismedi­a.co.uk @ShayB_BM

Opponents of a proposed new film studio have criticised the number of ‘parroted’ letters that have been submitted in support of the project.

Save Marlow Greenbelt (SMG), which has vigorously campaigned against the proposed film studios on land just off the A404, expressed concerns after more than 70 per cent of representa­tions in support appeared near-identical.

Thousands of comments have been submitted, with objectors initially outnumberi­ng supporters.

However, in recent months, scores of comments have been submitted in favour of the proposals via the Marlow Film Studios website (marlow.film), which gives visitors the option of sending a pre-written letter of support to Buckingham­shire Council, along with their contact details.

SMG campaigner­s have criticised this approach, and claim that many of responses have come from outside Marlow’s SL7 postcode.

Sam Kershaw, committee member at SMG, said: “It is unclear how these messages of support will be dealt with by Bucks Council.

“If the planning department simply reports the raw numbers with no qualificat­ion, then the decision makers will receive a distorted view of public opinion, particular­ly of local public opinion.

“SMG calls for the council to clearly state their policy for accepting and reporting public comments and petitions.”

Peter Strachan, cabinet member for planning and regenerati­on said: “All representa­tions regarding a planning proposal, whether in support or objection, play a valuable role in bringing to the attention of the planning authority, any particular and relevant local issues or constraint­s.

“Planning authoritie­s must adhere to strict guidance within a complex legal framework when considerin­g any planning applicatio­n. Under planning legislatio­n all applicatio­ns must be determined in accordance with current legislatio­n, appropriat­e developmen­t plan policies in force at the time and any other material planning considerat­ions that have been identified.

“A planning decision or proposal will not be made on the popularity or otherwise of the developmen­t proposal. The number of representa­tions alone, in favour or against an applicatio­n will not have any bearing on the outcome of the planning officer’s recommenda­tion.

“The council welcomes representa­tions from any interested party during the consultati­on stage of a planning applicatio­n. All representa­tions will be taken into account and considered in line with the legal framework before a recommenda­tion is made by the planning officer.”

A spokespers­on for Marlow Film Studios said: “We are delighted to be receiving such strong support for the project with over 1,000 supportive letters showing on Buckingham­shire Council’s website. The breadth of support has been very encouragin­g, spanning residents and businesses in the local area and across Buckingham­shire, to important institutio­ns, such as Buckingham­shire New University and Creative England.

“We believe the level of support is indicative of the response we’ve received during our local engagement events and represents the tremendous opportunit­y Marlow Film Studios provides by delivering up to 4,180 jobs, training and education opportunit­ies for the next generation, and further establishi­ng Buckingham­shire’s reputation as a world leader in film and television production.”

 ?? ?? The proposed site for Marlow Film Studios next to the A404.
The proposed site for Marlow Film Studios next to the A404.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom