Model Rail (UK)

Factfile: English Electric gas turbine GT3 4‑6‑0

-

From the very dawn of railways, engineers have 1 produced some cranky and misguided contraptio­ns intended to resolve a particular problem or test out some pet theory. In Stephenson’s time, one of the Rainhill test ‘locomotive­s’ was powered by a horse on a treadmill. The steam era featured strange locomotive­s like the Paget, LMS Fury and Gresley’s ‘W1’. Today we have a multiple unit powered by hydrogen. Back in the early 1960s there was GT3, built by English Electric to test its gas turbine in a rail applicatio­n.

Its two Western Region predecesso­rs, Nos. 18000/18100, had already been abandoned as being too inefficien­t on the WR’S ‘billiard table’ track, when GT3 was completed in 1961. It was, however, a very different gas turbine, designed to overcome that very inefficien­cy. The WR machines were gas turbine-electrics using the gas turbine to power a generator to supply electricit­y to traction motors. GT3 employed a mechanical drive to make more efficient use of the power. When GT3 design began, there were only the handful of LMS and Southern main line diesel-electrics. English Electric’s J.O.P. Hughes, for whom the railway gas turbine seems to have been a personal project, avoided the complicati­ons of mechanical drive to two bogies by adopting a steam locomotive-style chassis with a 4-6-0 wheel arrangemen­t. Even so, it took more than 10 years to get GT3 built and in that decade developmen­ts on BR changed the scene dramatical­ly. Steam traction would be replaced by the doubleende­d main line diesel-electric, BR would have no further interest in pursuing gas turbine traction, and steam-era facilities such as turntables would be demolished.

Unlike the other two gas turbines, GT3 was never taken into BR stock. It remained EE property but BR provided facilities for testing, including accommodat­ing the locomotive at Whitchurch in Shropshire, close to one of the EE works. It operated test trains of empty stock on the North Wales coast line and over Shap on the West Coast Main Line, but it never hauled a service train. It is said that it never failed to complete a test run but its experiment­al use lasted little more than one year. It was subsequent­ly scrapped. Yet its striking appearance has endeared it to many. Perhaps the last of the great railway contraptio­ns, it looked so much like a steam locomotive that rumours persist that it was built on a redundant 4-6-0 steam chassis. It had a tender which carried kerosene rather than water, but it

2 was the plush, carpeted cab which repeatedly caused comment.

It is hard to imagine how that would have been practical in the filthy steam environmen­t of 1961. The twin-cab diesel-electric was the future for BR and GT3 was, sadly, a dead end.

which brings locomotive and tender close on straight track but allows them to open out on curves.

The large etched fan grille on the tender top is an outlet for sound on DCC sound-fitted models. A mounting for a 28mm speaker is incorporat­ed but the rather meagre instructio­ns give little clue how to access it. Perhaps, as this model had been elsewhere, an instructio­n sheet might be missing from the package. Windows in the tender front and rear are glazed, and both locomotive and tender are fitted with sprung and blackened oval metal buffers.

A standard tension-lock coupling in a pivoted NEM pocket is provided on the tender rear, and the front bogie also carries an NEM pocket.

CONCLUSION­S

J.O.P. Hughes’ steam-style design, which was largely a Hobson’s Choice when he designed it, not only simplified the gas turbinemec­hanical arrangemen­t it also makes a rather helpful first project for someone new to ready-to-run model design.

It has a basic six-coupled chassis which is devoid of the complicati­on of outside cylinders and valve gear and the long, sleek ‘bonnet’ has no requiremen­t for daylight under the boiler or any of the other aspects that constrain models of steam locomotive­s.

KR Models has used that simplicity to its advantage and created a model which is sleek and attractive and very well executed. Customers who pre-ordered should be well pleased when their models arrive. For the rest of us, expression­s of interest are open at www.krmodels.co.uk and I understand a pre-order arrangemen­t for batch two will open shortly. Bulleid’s ‘Leader’ and the ‘Fell’ diesel mechanical could be next! (CJL)

 ??  ??
 ?? A. WILD/COLOUR RAIL ?? 1: GT3 at its most impressive, against a spectacula­r sky, storming Shap at Scout Green with a lengthy test train of old LMS stock on an unrecorded date. The locomotive’s steam styling makes the absence of a magnificen­t column of exhaust seem almost strange. COLOUR RAIL
2: Close-up photograph­s of GT3 are rare, as are any pictures of the locomotive. I chose this, as one of the best, taken at Newton-lewillows in September 1963 when the locomotive’s working career was over but it had yet to be dismantled.
A. WILD/COLOUR RAIL 1: GT3 at its most impressive, against a spectacula­r sky, storming Shap at Scout Green with a lengthy test train of old LMS stock on an unrecorded date. The locomotive’s steam styling makes the absence of a magnificen­t column of exhaust seem almost strange. COLOUR RAIL 2: Close-up photograph­s of GT3 are rare, as are any pictures of the locomotive. I chose this, as one of the best, taken at Newton-lewillows in September 1963 when the locomotive’s working career was over but it had yet to be dismantled.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom