Musselburgh Courier

Action group is ‘at breaking point’

-

Over the last few weeks, the Musselburg­h Flood Protection Action Group has run support workshops to help locals write their objections to the proposed Musselburg­h Flood Protection Scheme (MFPS). The workshops have been full and our volunteers snowed under by people worried their letters were in the correct format or had enough detail.

The action group is run 100 per cent by volunteers who want to protect the natural beauty and accessibil­ity of Musselburg­h’s River Esk.

What little support Musselburg­h people had been offered by councillor­s and the design team about the proposed MFPS has now ended. People are instructed to read the documents, prepared by qualified engineers.

It would take one person 16 days to read the thousands of pages. The documents can be viewed online or at only one place in Musselburg­h during working hours on weekdays. One set of documents for 20,000-plus people!

A copy can, however, be purchased for £1,000!

Opposition to the proposed MFPS has been significan­tly undermined by councillor­s deciding, 24 hours prior to approving the scheme and moving to the 28-day objection period, that the Musselburg­h Active Toun (MAT) (essentiall­y wide cycle paths) is to be withdrawn from the scheme.

Why? MAT requires public consent via planning permission. The councillor­s and the scheme designers have known all along that planning permission for MAT is a legal requiremen­t. All the parts of MAT that direct the MFPS design (narrowing the river, double ramps for bicycle access, adding new bridges and building higher walls) remain in place. The provision for MAT is on all the accessible informatio­n and the environmen­tal report prepared by the scheme designer. This makes objections by the people of Musselburg­h more difficult.

Many in the action group are at breaking point with stress, struggling to meet the demands for help that are being requested. I hope that the council and the scheme designer take the time to read this and feel some compassion and perhaps even reconsider what they are planning for Musselburg­h.

Is the proposed design what the people of Musselburg­h want? Are taxpayers prepared to contribute 20 per cent (presently estimated at about £21 million pounds) to fund this? The council does not have this money – they will borrow it.

Please object to East Lothian Council’s plan to waste your hard-earned money. Advice and informatio­n on how to object can be found at pausethefl­oodscheme.com/ objection-letters

Objections should be submitted by Saturday (to be on the safe side) and can be emailed to cgrilli@eastlo thian.gov.uk or mfpsobjec tions@eastlothia­n.gov.uk Eve Dickinson

Musselburg­h

An East Lothian Council spokespers­on said: “In developing proposals for the Musselburg­h Flood Protection Scheme, there has been significan­t community engagement in different formats over a number of years. This has proved to be very helpful in enabling the project team to incorporat­e feedback, producing an outline design focused on reducing flood risk using establishe­d and evidence-based techniques, while retaining the town’s historic character and natural environmen­t. The Flood Protection Scheme is subject to a specific approval process, separate from other projects. At January’s meeting of East Lothian Council, elected members agreed that the developed design could be presented to stakeholde­rs and the public through a formal, statutory consultati­on process The formal phase of consultati­on is now underway. All informatio­n required to enable members of the public to prepare their comments, representa­tions or objections is contained with the published suite ofscheme documents.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom