Sterling Gardens road impacts on residents

MARK Giddens, writing in last week’s NWN, was absolutely correct in his analogy of the Hectors Way to Kings Road link road.

This will undoubtedly have benefits for Mill Lane residents, with the possibility of less through traffic, along with residents in the part of Kings Road from Sainsbury’s traffic lights to the new proposed mini roundabout (which could end up as a cul de sac if proposals go ahead )

But what about the poor residents from the mini roundabout to the junction of Boundary Road?

They have had to endure several years of noise disturbance, dust and displaced parking due to the Sterling Cables development.

Now they find not only two-way traffic along their section of road, which will result in continuous noise, exhaust fumes, more HGVs’ headlights directly into their houses from the new road and no formal parking unless the new development allows space in their underground car park.

But even if agreed (and councillors have been pressing for this to happen for some time) this will mean a long walk to their properties, not ideal for families with small children on a wet day or if heavy bags are required to be carried.

These residents already have official parking permits, therefore even if part of the road becomes a cul de sac surely they could use that section to park, bearing in mind a section of Kings Road still has unlimited parking.

This should become part of the E1 residents’ parking area

Finally, with any changes, whether relating to new developments, new road or layout changes, we must consider the impact on local residents, As councillors we shouldn’t be expected to agree changes which inevitably reduce the quality of life for existing residents.

PHIL BARNETT

Liberal Democrat councillor for Greenham ward

West Berkshire Council