Nottingham Post

Pay for extra parking permits?

- By JOSEPH LOCKER

NOTTINGHAM residents face having to pay for second and third parking permits as the city council seeks the “leastworst ways” to balance its budget.

The authority is keeping first permits (either a residentia­l or visitor permit) free of charge, but wants households in some areas to pay £35 for a second permit and £50 for a third.

The council is looking to balance its budget under the watch of a Government­appointed improvemen­t board.

Councillor Neghat Khan, portfolio holder for neighbourh­oods, safety and inclusion, says there are roughly 800 Nottingham streets with permit schemes with more than 45,000 permits currently in circulatio­n.

A consultati­on launched in July, lasting until September led to councillor­s approving the plans in principle at an executive board meeting on Tuesday.

Permit schemes cost the council over £500,000 every year and under the proposals the Labour-run authority would generate more than £400,000 to meet costs.

But residents are “not happy” and opposition councillor­s condemned the plans.

Councillor Kevin Clarke, Independen­t councillor for Clifton East, said: “I would just like for us, really, to appreciate why these problems have occurred within parking.

“The way I see it, and the way many residents see it, is the council mis-sold a lot of the responsibi­lity for it, the parking levy, the amount of students we have now in my ward particular­ly and the tram.

“They have all added to these parking problems and now we are expected to let the residents incur these extra charges.”

Councillor Andrew Rule, leader of the council’s Conservati­ve

group, agreed and said one of the “historical justificat­ions” for the council having the second-highest council tax in the country for band D properties was because permits and bulky waste collection­s were free.

“At the time of the next election I will have been a councillor for eight years and I cannot overstate how significan­t parking charges have been to the residents of the east over that time, and how much they are due to external factors and not of residents’ causing.

“I understand part of the revenue initially from the workplace parking levy when it was first introduced was earmarked for funding schemes to combat displaceme­nt. Sadly Clifton never received any of this and it was left to ward councillor­s to resolve.”

Councillor Adele Williams, deputy leader of the council and portfolio holder for finance, argued that 80 percent of homes in Nottingham were on the lowest bands (A and B). The average bill, she said, was “the fourth-lowest in the country” as a result.

Council leader Councillor

David Mellen said: “Well, clearly people don’t want to pay more money than they need to but our regime compared to nearly every other authority in the country has been very generous to residents.

“As Councillor Khan has said, we retain a free permit for most people, most people in our city have either not got a car or only one and obviously there will be, as Neghat says, some administra­tive costs already that we are subsidisin­g these permits for.

“As for the tram, the tram has been contribute­d for by the Workplace Parking Levy and your community in Clifton have benefited from the tram more than many communitie­s.”

Councillor Linda Woodings added: “We don’t particular­ly want to introduce charges for this but we have to balance our budget at the end of every year, so we are trying to look for the least-worst ways to balance our budget.

“I hope people accept we are where we are, as are other local authoritie­s in the country.”

 ?? ?? A ‘permit holders only’ parking sign
A ‘permit holders only’ parking sign

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom