Back-tracking andbetrayal on badgercull
JUST four years ago, The Wildlife Trusts welcomed the Government’s commitment to prioritising vaccination over culling in the fight to control the spread of Bovine Tuberculosis.
We took the statement at face value and saw it as something of a vindication of the vaccination approach that we had been developing since 2011 nationally and since 2015 here in Nottinghamshire.
As ever, the devil was in the detail and whilst the Government announcement focused on the longterm commitment to end culling – a deeper dive behind the headlines raised concerns that the cull would be ramped up and expanded in many areas.
In time it became apparent that there were plans afoot to expand the cull into the area where we’d spent years developing our badger vaccination programme with Government funding. Even the prospect of an expanded cull served to seriously undermine our science-based vaccination programme - with farmers previously supportive feeling pressure from peers.
The decision to expand the cull back in 2021 came as a real blow. With four year licences issued in 2021 and 2022 whilst the Government’s stated long term aim was to bring the cull to an end; this should have meant culling would stop in 2026.
Even with the prospect of the end of the cull in sight we feared that the new licences would put a further 130,000 badgers at risk – and potentially resulting in 300,000 badgers out of a population of 485,000, approximately 60% of the estimated population being culled by 2026 – approximately 60%!
I remember saying to a colleague at the time, in frustration, that it seemed that the Government was planning to end the cull once they’d killed all the badgers and this week, I read a quote in the Guardian from ecological consultant Tom Langton which read “Sunak now wants all the badgers dead”. Mr Langton’s comments referring to his view that a new consultation on the badger cull included “chilling plans to kill 100% of badgers in bovine TB affected areas.”
A key element of the new approach the Government is consulting on is that culling would be kept open as a method of control – with no stated end date meaning badgers could go on being killed indefinitely.
In the Ministerial foreword for the consultation The Rt Honourable Steve Barclay MP Secretary of State for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs says: “Under proposals we will move away from culls of fixed duration. Culling would continue in areas for as long as is necessary…badger vaccination would then take place to maintain disease control benefits.”
One way of interpreting this would be - kill now, vaccinate later – which in my view is both unsustainable and unacceptable. Given that the UK is home to 25% of the European population The Wildlife Trusts believe that the UK has an international responsibility to conserve them.
In the note for applicants seeking to be granted a licence to cull badgers there is a section describing what constitutes an ‘effective’ cull.
The guidance states that any cull should seek to reduce the badger population to a level where it would “ideally substantially reduce or even eliminate the risk of infection of cattle from badgers.”
Given the Government’s track record on extending and expanding I worry that this could be interpreted that to eliminate the risk of infection via badgers all badger must be eliminated.
Time and again the Government has failed to listen to the public’s concerns on this emotive issue, but I would urge as many people as possible to have their say on Bovine TB: future badger control policy and cattle measure proposals at www.gov.uk/ government/consultations/ before April 22nd.
Once on the main consultation page – search for badger.