Octane

Citroën XM

Comfortabl­e, hugely practical and styled by Bertone. Cheap, too...

- CAR MANUFACTUR­ERS SHOULD Matthew Hayward

take note. The XM is a perfect example of how it’s possible to respectful­ly take inspiratio­n from an older iconic model, such as the SM, without going fully retro. Just look at its pointy front end, slender headlights and the kink in the window line – all subtle throw-backs to the magnificen­t SM. It’s aged very well, too.

Citroën started work on the CX’s replacemen­t in 1984, but this was to be a new flagship, aiming at a new breed of thrusting business executives. The basic architectu­re, engines and transmissi­ons were to be shared with Peugeot’s upcoming 605, but Citroën had free rein with pretty much everything else – and virtually nothing would be carried over from the CX.

The original styling sketch was penned by Bertone’s styling director Marc Deschamps – reportedly on the flight home from the initial meeting at Citroën in ’84.

Citroën’s hydropneum­atic suspension system would be used, but with one key difference: it was to be computer controlled. Sensors and electroval­ves meant that ‘Hydractive’ could switch the suspension from soft on the straights to a significan­tly stiffer setup on the way into the bends, almost eliminatin­g roll.

The XM was launched in 1989, offering a basic 2.0-litre carburette­d and more powerful EFi petrols, a frugal 2.1-litre 12-valve diesel, and the top-of-therange 3.0-litre V6 petrol. Interior space and passenger comfort were right at the top of Citroën’s long list of requiremen­ts, and it certainly paid off. The interior of an XM feels vast, with rear passengers treated to just as much comfort as those in the front. In 1990, the range-topping 146mph V6 24v was launched, which when coupled with a manual gearbox became the fastest car Citroën had ever built. Sadly this engine was not the strongest, and the unreliabil­ity added to an already shaky reputation early XMs had earned thanks to substandar­d electrical connectors.

Despite that poor start, post-1992 ‘series 1.5’ cars were far more reliable, but sales and residual values never recovered. A smooth and very torquey 2.0-litre ‘constant torque’ low-pressure turbo engine provided a good-value option for buyers from 1992.

The major facelift was launched in mid-1994, introducin­g a slightly toned-down dashboard and a few minor external tweaks. Updated Hydractive 2 suspension offered a superior handling and ride compromise, while a 2.0-litre 16v engine was introduced at the entry-level. A much-improved allalloy 193bhp 2.9-litre 24v V6 engine followed in 1997, with production continuing right up to 2000. It would be five years before the C6 replaced it in 2005.

Make sure you know a good specialist, and XM ownership can actually be very rewarding. The conundrum is whether to go for the design purity of an early car or the much-improved build and dynamics of a later example. The sweet spot might very well be one of the mid-production ‘Series 1.5’ cars, which many argue offer the best of both worlds. Riding in even the most basic XM feels like an event, though. Find a nice one, look after it, and enjoy the very best of 1990s French executive motoring.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom