Perthshire Advertiser

Trust objects to St Paul’s building plans

PKHT want the church fully repaired

- Rachel Clark

Church St Paul’s Perth and Kinross Heritage Trust (PKHT) has slammed proposals to redevelop St Paul’s Church as “shortsight­ed”.

A planning applicatio­n and listed building consent are currently being considered to transform the dilapidate­d church in Perth city centre into a public space, by removing the roof, glazing and doors and stripping out all the interior fittings and furnishing­s.

The building’s shell would then create an uncovered but walled outdoor space, which Perth and Kinross Council hopes to use for events such as markets.

However, PKHT lodged a six-page objection to the proposals last week, saying it would give a poor return on public investment.

The objection stated: “The trust believes that this proposal is short sighted, sets a bad precedent for treatment of the historic environmen­t in Perth, gives a poor return on public investment in terms of cultural capital, and is a missed opportunit­y to generate significan­t social, economic and training opportunit­ies through the regenerati­on of this area of Perth through a scheme to repair St Paul’s as a viable building.

“We propose that a scheme to repair St Paul’s as a usable shell should be the minimum acceptable proposal for a historic building of this nature and that the retention or remodellin­g of some interior features should also be considered at this stage as it will bring additional benefits in social regenerati­on terms and for finding new users.

“This would maintain the potential for use by markets and other activities, extend the range of users who may prefer a weather protect space, and enhance potential for future developmen­t and investment.”

One of the main points raised in the objection is over the cost of the planned redevelopm­ent. The current plans to create a hollow shell would cost around £2.24m, however PKHT argues plans to repair the structure is only slightly more, at £2.43m.

The trust adds if the council were to push ahead with their proposal of repairing the building, they would be able to apply for greater financial grants from outside bodies such as Historic Environmen­t Scotland or Heritage Lottery Fund.

In the objection, the heritage trust went on to list a number of points they were not happy with in the planning applicatio­n.

The objection continued: “The proposal adversely affects the special interest and authentici­ty of the building. The proposal does not recognise or value the historic and architectu­ral importance of the building as a complete design.

“The applicatio­n does not demonstrat­e that the proposal represents ‘best value’ for the people of Perth or that other sources of financial support have been investigat­ed to bridge the conservati­on deficit.

“The applicatio­n does not satisfacto­rily address the existing issues of pigeons using the building as a roost and the building being a focus for anti-social behaviour.

“The applicatio­n does not satisfacto­rily establish the precise extent and quality of the proposed works to a listed building ... [and] does not give sufficient justificat­ion for the removal of the roof, a proposal which significan­tly affects the special interest of the building.”

However, in their applicatio­n the trust welcomes plans to repair the spire, and the clock and bell inside as part of their plans.

The objection from PKHT will now be considered by planning bosses at the local authority.

 ??  ?? Objections
Objections

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom