Pride Life Magazine

In The Family Way

DOCTOR MICHAEL DOYLE OF THE POPULAR INTERNATIO­NAL IVF CEN TRE CT FERTILITY EXPLAINS IN LAYMAN’S TERMS HOW IVF TECHNOLOGY CONTINUES TO EVOLVE AND RESULT IN EVEN BETTER RESULTS FOR PROSPECTIV­E GAY PARENTS

-

The key challenge of IVF has always been to create the healthiest embryos possible and to identify the ones that are most likely to develop well and result in a successful pregnancy. Given the health risk of multiple births for both the carrier and the future babies, the goal is to transfer the lowest possible number (often only one now) and still achieve the maximal impact (highest pregnancy rate).

Twenty years ago the best we could do was to grow embryos for three days before implanting them into the carrier’s womb, as few would survive longer in the laboratory. However at that early stage of developmen­t it was impossible to predict which embryos would further develop, and that meant transferri­ng a higher number of embryos and “hoping for the best.” Unfortunat­ely often the result was no pregnancy, and when it was achieved, multiple pregnancie­s were common. PATIENCE IS A VIRTUE – ALSO WHEN IT COMES TO EMBRYO REARING Over time, science gained a better understand­ing of the nutrient sources for embryonic developmen­t and skilled embryologi­sts were able to sustain embryos for 5- 6 days so they could reach the critical “blastocyst” phase. At this stage it is much easier to determine which embryos will result in healthy live births, based on their rate of cellular growth and other gradable qualities.

Even with these far more effective blastocyst transfers, however, it was demonstrat­ed that many of these highly graded embryos still had chromosoma­l abnormalit­ies that led to reduced implantati­on or increased miscarriag­e. This heralded our next breakthrou­gh – the ability to biopsy (before embryo transfer) each blastocyst to ensure that the genetics (chromosome­s) contained in each cell’s nuclear DNA were normal. This pre-implantati­on genetic screening (PGS) could thereby increase implantati­on rates and add a new level of safety, as well as reassuranc­e that if the embryo were able to implant, subsequent miscarriag­e would be less common. DNA SEQUENCING OF EMBRYOS WITHOUT UNPLEASANT TRADEOFFS Early PGS techniques (particular­ly when done on 3-day old embryos) were associated with several drawbacks, including the risk of fetal component. Also, since some clinics are able to perform same-day PGS and get the DNA results back within 24 hours, there is no longer the need to unnecessar­ily freeze all the embryos while waiting for the PGS results. This is key because despite some unproven claims to the contrary, we believe that fresh embryos do better than frozen. GETTING THE COMPLETE PICTURE WITH SIMULTANEO­US NUCLEAR AND MITOCHONDR­IAL DNA TESTING The most current state-of-the-art fertility treatments take nuclear DNA PGS to the next step by evaluating the “other kind of DNA” contained in the embryonic cell’s cytoplasm (not the nucleus) – the mitochondr­ial DNA, which directs the ability of the embryo to perform critical functions like cell division and implantati­on. Therefore even if an embryo has normal nuclear DNA it is far less likely to continue to grow after the transfer and successful­ly implant if mitochondr­ial DNA is not at appropriat­e levels. This latest generation PGS offers a far more precise analysis of the potential of each embryo than traditiona­l PGS, with no tradeoffs.

I am proud that CT Fertility is one of the few fertility clinics in the world that offers routine simultaneo­us nuclear and mitochondr­ial DNA testing as part of its PGS program. We believe that the technology is affording more of our clients an added level of reassuranc­e, choice and control, and reaffirms our commitment to increase success without escalating costs.

Go to: www.ctfertilit­y.com

 ??  ?? HUGO AND MARCUS AND THEIR CHILDREN
HUGO AND MARCUS AND THEIR CHILDREN

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom