Rail (UK)

Industrial action unexpected in TSGN franchise bidding

-

Department for Transport Permanent Secretary Bernadette Kelly told the Public Accounts Committee inquiry into rail franchisin­g that the amount of industrial action had been greater than expected following the wider introducti­on of DriverCont­rolled Operation trains on the Thameslink, Southern, Great Northern (TSGN) franchise.

“Obviously, industrial action on the railway is not unpreceden­ted, and from that point of view it was clearly a risk that we thought about,” she said.

“But we had good reasons at the point at which we were designing and letting the franchise to imagine that it would be nothing like as significan­t as it has been in practice. DCO was already in extensive use across the railway, including on this franchise, before the start of the franchise.”

Kelly added that the DfT did not demand the introducti­on of DCO, saying it was a choice taken by bidders.

DfT Managing Director, Passenger Services Peter Wilkinson described attempts to engage trades unions in discussion­s about the extension of DCO before the franchise was let as “difficult”. Explaining that 60% of trains on the franchise already operated under this method, he added: “At that time, it was not seen as particular­ly contentiou­s that we would extend that a little further.”

Govia Thameslink Railway Managing Director Charles Horton defended DCO, saying: “We believe that evidence collected over many years proves that driveronly operation is at least as safe as other methods of operation and may offer some advantages, because of the lower risk of miscommuni­cation between two people involved in a task.”

Horton also denied that the company had overbid for the franchise: “We put in what I would describe as a solid bid, which looked at the risks in a reasonable way. We had some exciting plans with some big improvemen­ts for customers in our bid.

“It is fair to say that there were two risks: the risk of operating a network that was so constricte­d as a result of the works that were ongoing, and the risks associated with industrial action, which crystallis­ed in a way that we had not foreseen. Of course, we know the result in terms of the impact on our passengers and on the profits we have been able to make as a private sector operator.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom