Rail (UK)

Campaigner­s seek reversal of further bridge infills

- Howard Johnston Contributi­ng Writer rail@bauermedia.co.uk

CAMPAIGNER­S who want to stop redundant railway bridges from being infilled claim that four more schemes carried out by National Highways have “questionab­le legal status” and must be reversed.

Hard on the heels of Eden Council’s ruling that 1,600 tonnes of aggregates and concrete must be removed from a bridge at Great Musgrave in Cumbria

(RAIL 968), the HRE Group believes it has identified more bridges where emergency developmen­t powers used to carry out the work have expired.

Following legal advice, the HRE Group (an alliance of walking, cycling and heritage campaigner­s, engineers and greenway developers) says that National Highways was wrong to use emergency powers created to address temporary problems with the structures, because the work carried out is clearly intended to be permanent.

The first location named is the 1923 steel and concrete Congham Road bridge over the former M&GN King’s Lynn-Fakenham line, which is one of several identified in Norfolk County Council’s walking and cycling strategy. The route was blocked by NH contractor­s’ infilling of the structure in March/April 2021 at a cost of £127,000.

In Yorkshire, the £133,000 spent infilling Rudgate Road bridge at Newton Kyme, on the old

Wetherby-Tadcaster line, is claimed to have spoiled the prospects of completing a cycle path.

Two other structures, near South Woodham Ferrers in Essex and in Ilford in north-east London, have also been infilled at a combined cost of £312,000.

HRE contends that the emergency powers dictated that “the infill should have been removed from these structures within 12 months of work starting unless written consent to retain it had been granted by the local

planning authoritie­s”.

It says that its request to NH in February for copies of these approvals has not yielded a response, and that it has written to the four local authoritie­s concerned requesting confirmati­on of their positions. Selby District Council has begun its own investigat­ion into the Rudgate Road infill.

It is now nine years since NH was given the task of managing 3,100 redundant railway structures on behalf of the Department for Transport. It has spent around £8 million infilling 51 bridges, but had hired six companies and consultant­s to carry out around £300m of such work over a decade.

The programme was halted by the Government in July last year. National Highways has establishe­d a Stakeholde­r Advisory Forum to review all future major works to HRE structures, but confirmed that outcomes for 68 bridges and tunnels previously threatened with infilling or demolition are still awaited.

It added that any future major works will be the subject of review and consultati­on with its Stakeholde­r Advisory Forum, establishe­d in October 2021.

In June, Eden Council rejected a retrospect­ive planning applicatio­n for the 1861 bridge at Great Musgrave. The aggregate and concrete will have to be removed by October 11 next year.

 ?? RICHARD HUMPHREY. ?? Congham Road Bridge before: Congham Road bridge, near King’s Lynn, comprised a steel and concrete superstruc­ture dating from around 1923.
RICHARD HUMPHREY. Congham Road Bridge before: Congham Road bridge, near King’s Lynn, comprised a steel and concrete superstruc­ture dating from around 1923.
 ?? HRE GROUP. ?? Congham Road Bridge after: The structure was infilled under emergency developmen­t powers that HRE says have now expired.
HRE GROUP. Congham Road Bridge after: The structure was infilled under emergency developmen­t powers that HRE says have now expired.
 ?? ??
 ?? HRE GROUP. ?? Rudgate Road Bridge after: Rudgate Road bridge had an assessed capacity of 32 tonnes, but National Highways infilled it under emergency developmen­t powers to “prevent an emergency arising”.
HRE GROUP. Rudgate Road Bridge after: Rudgate Road bridge had an assessed capacity of 32 tonnes, but National Highways infilled it under emergency developmen­t powers to “prevent an emergency arising”.
 ?? ROBERT MATLEY. ?? Rudgate Road Bridge before: The site of Newton Kyme station, immediatel­y north of Rudgate Road bridge, had already been infilled, but the stone-arched structure served as a reminder of the former Wetherby-Tadcaster railway.
ROBERT MATLEY. Rudgate Road Bridge before: The site of Newton Kyme station, immediatel­y north of Rudgate Road bridge, had already been infilled, but the stone-arched structure served as a reminder of the former Wetherby-Tadcaster railway.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom