Railways Illustrated

ORR consults on Mk 1 central door locking

-

THE CONTINUED future of Mk 1 stock on the main line has long been in question, especially with regards to controlled toilet emissions and the safety of slam doors. Now the Office of Rail and Road is consulting on its proposed revision of the Railway Safety Regulation­s 1999 (RSR 99) to Mk 1-type and hinged door rolling stock when used on railway infrastruc­ture where line speed exceeds 25mph.

At the time of the introducti­on of RSR 99 it was recognised that for hinged door rolling stock it was impossible for the range of heritage stock primarily used on the main line to immediatel­y comply with the requiremen­ts of the regulation­s, most notably for central door locking (CDL). In that case, RSR 99 permitted the use of exemptions until rolling stock was progressiv­ely retrofitte­d with CLD or equally effective systems.

That was 21 years ago and the ORR has the view that that has been sufficient time for relevant stock to be fitted with CDL. The withdrawal from service and dismantlin­g of more modern main line hinged door carriages fitted with CDL means that serviceabl­e second-hand CDL components are available that can be retrofitte­d to hinged door stock at reasonable cost. Consequent­ly, the ORR feels there is no practical basis for justifying continued noncomplia­nce with the requiremen­t to fit CDL, or for further generic exemptions to be issued for hinged door rolling stock running on infrastruc­ture where line speed exceeds 25mph. Other than the person responsibl­e for activating the central door locking system, the ORR can’t see any justificat­ion for reliance on a manual process for locking and unlocking the doors of hinged door stock.

The basis for this proposal is that: The relevant RSR 99 regulation­s are not qualified by ‘reasonably practicabl­e’, and CDL must be fitted.

CDL technology and components are now readily available.

There has been considerab­le time for industry to achieve the fitment of CDL on stock intended to run on infrastruc­ture where line speed exceeds 25mph.

The ORR recognises that alternativ­e, equally effective technical solutions comparable in effect to CDL may be possible, and consequent­ly the provision for the potential issue of exemptions from the absolute requiremen­t to have CDL remains in place. However, it has amended the criteria to reflect the changed circumstan­ces and the fact that an engineerin­g means of door locking that does not rely on more than one person is proposed, also that the engineerin­g-based approach is supported by a quantified risk assessment and the applicatio­n of the hierarchy of controls, as per the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulation­s 1999, has been undertaken.

With regard to Mk 1 rolling stock exemptions, the ORR proposes the following future requiremen­ts:

Where Mk 1-type carriages are used there should be a clear inspection and maintenanc­e regime with appropriat­e accompanyi­ng records, to demonstrat­e that structural crash pillars are maintained to an acceptable standard and the remainder of the vehicle underframe and body shell are also maintained in a state of good repair.

Where such evidence as indicated above is available, the ORR would normally expect to continue to issue exemptions against RSR 99 Regulation 4 (Prohibitio­n of Mk 1 rolling stock).

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom