Rochdale Observer

Councillor­s ‘not keeping highest form of conduct’

Lib Dem leader urges colleagues to declare interests

- NICK STATHAM Local Democracy Service

ROCHDALE councillor­s are failing to meet the ‘keep the highest form of conduct’ by declaring gifts, business interests and who they work for according to the leader of the authority’s Liberal Democrats group.

Coun Andy Kelly has called for the council’s constituti­onal working party to look into the matter and urged members to declare their interests on the council website ‘in a timely fashion’.

Speaking at a meeting of the full council, he referred to news of chaotic scenes at the House of Commons and noted that Suella Braverman had earlier resigned as home secretary ‘on the basis of conduct’.

Coun Kelly said he had concerns over the public perception of politician­s at all levels – from Westminste­r to borough councils.

“We are expected to – and should – keep the highest form of conduct in our communitie­s and in our borough,” he told councillor­s last Wednesday night.

“We need to do that and there are ways in which we can do it and there are some simple points of conduct we need to do and, I’m afraid colleagues, we don’t do.”

Coun Kelly claimed that the council’s constituti­on had been ‘tinkered’ with so many times the checks and balances on members’ behaviour had now failed – and councillor­s should take ‘collective responsibi­lity’ for it.

“Some of this is about the gifts we sometimes occasional­ly receive and declaring them publicly,” he added.

“We are fortunate enough to sometimes be invited to events.

“I made a point at the last council meeting about football and cricket [matches] and so on and so forth.

“But if the value is more than £25 it’s up to us to declare it on the [council] website.

“Similarly, it’s up to us to declare who we work for, who our partner works for, what property we own and what businesses we have.

“Even if it’s a failing business we have a responsibi­lity to put that on the website – and we don’t do it.”

Council leader Neil Emmott agreed it was ‘important’ that the constituti­onal working group looked at the issue, but said any specific concerns should be raised with the monitoring officer.

“If there are things to look at, let’s look at them,” he said. “I don’t know which members have not declared things on the council website – that’s for the monitoring officer to look at and those individual members.”

He also suggested that the all-out election held in Rochdale this year may be a factor.

“We have a lot of new members of the council from all political parties and possibly some people have been a bit confused as to what they needed to declare.”

Coun Emmott also assured Coun Kelly he would be invited to the next meeting of the constituti­on working party, which had not met since he last raised concerns over the issue.

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? ●●Coun Andy Kelly, Liberal Democrat leader
●●Coun Andy Kelly, Liberal Democrat leader
 ?? ?? ●●Rochdale council leader Coun Neil Emmott.
●●Rochdale council leader Coun Neil Emmott.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom