Scottish Daily Mail

Comparison sites ‘should pay conned customers’

- By Sean Poulter Consumer Affairs Editor

PRICE-COMPARISON websites should compensate customers who lose out after being kept in the dark about cheaper energy deals, MPs say. The Commons energy and climate change committee said MoneySuper­Market, uSwitch, Comparethe­market, Confused. com and GoCompare set up their websites so people looking for cheaper gas and electricit­y were directed to suppliers that pay them millions in commission instead of all available deals, some of which may be cheaper.

Chairman Tim Yeo said: ‘Some price-comparison sites have been behaving more like back-street market traders than the trustworth­y consumer champions they make themselves out to be.’

The firms get £50 to £70 commission for a dual-fuel switch, but consumers may pay hundreds of pounds more than necessary. In a report today, the MPs said the firms should pay compensati­on to customers who missed out on the cheapest energy deal as a result.

But Comparethe­market said the report was sensationa­list, while uSwitch said it already paid compensati­on if customers were misled and GoCompare claimed it had made improvemen­ts. MoneySuper­Market and Confused.com insisted they operated under voluntary guidelines set by the watchdog Ofgem.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom