Scottish Daily Mail

DEADLY COST OF OUR OPEN BORDERS

Catalogue of UK murders and rapes by criminals let in under EU rules

- By Jack Doyle and Ian Drury

EU free movement rules have let dozens of foreign criminals commit horrific offences in Britain, analysis reveals.

A dossier released today lists 50 of the ‘most dangerous’ European criminals who have entered the UK freely, despite conviction­s in their countries.

Once here, 45 of them committed serious offences – including some in Scotland – the report by Brexit campaign Vote Leave says.

In total, they were responsibl­e for 14 killings, including nine murders, and 13 sex crimes of which seven were rape.

They also carried out robberies, theft, burglaries and drug offences.

Last night Brexit supporters said the report showed EU membership made the UK ‘less safe and less secure’. The EU does not compel member states to share informatio­n on criminals, meaning many are able to travel to the UK unhindered.

Free movement rules give every EU citizen the right to enter any country in the bloc.

Euroscepti­cs argue that if Britain votes to leave we could negotiate a new deal that does not include free movement of workers without more stringent checks. These

could include criminal record checks on anyone wanting a visa, even for the short term. Serious offenders could then be automatica­lly excluded.

The Government could continue cooperatio­n on informatio­n sharing and extraditio­n under any new agreements.

Among those on the list of 50 drawn up by Brexit campaign group Vote Leave are Arnis Zalkalns, the Latvian who murdered his wife before moving to the UK where he killed 14-year-old Alice Gross.

It also names Ireneusz Bartnowski, a Polish burglar who murdered elderly couple Guiseppe and Caterina Massaro within weeks of arriving in the UK.

Five of those on the list have gone on to commit crimes, including rape and murder, in Scotland.

The dossier also reveals the exasperati­on and despair of British judges presiding over these cases, as they questioned how such dangerous men got into the country in the first place.

Victor Akulic, a serial Lithuanian offender with conviction­s including child rape, committed rape again within a year of entering Britain. In court, Lady Justice Hallett asked: ‘Do we have to take in anybody, even if they have a conviction for raping a child?’

Kajus Scuka had conviction­s for murder, gross indecency and assault but after coming to the UK committed rape and three other sex attacks within months.

Sentencing, Judge Peter Kelson said: ‘It seems to me … even with your conviction­s for murder and assaults you were free to enjoy the same freedom of movement as any other European citizen.’

Among five who did not commit any offence i n Britain i s Abdelhamid Abaaoud, who helped plan the Bataclan terror attacks in Paris. He entered the UK despite a conviction in Belgium for terrorism-related offences.

Tatjana Kurlankova tortured and killed an elderly woman in her native Latvia. She was jailed for ten years, but fled the country and ended up living in Plains, near Airdrie in Lanarkshir­e. She was only traced after receiving a fixed penalty for drinking in a Glasgow street.

Brexit campaigner­s argued the report showed EU membership meant Britain had lost control of its borders. Justice minister Dominic Raab, who is backing Brexit, said: ‘EU rules make it far too difficult to control who comes into the UK, and who we can deport.

‘In security terms, that forces us to import risk at the expense of public protection. There’s no escaping the fact that this weakens our security.’

Vote Leave chief executive Matthew Elliott said: ‘We’ve allowed EU judges to hang out a welcome sign to individual­s the public would rightly expect never to be allowed into the UK. If we want a sensible and humane migration policy, the only safe option is to vote Leave and take back control.’

Tory MP David Davis, former shadow home secretary, said: ‘This highlights a big hole in the argument of those who say that being in the UK adds to our security and safety. As this list shows, it no way adds to our safety in any way; instead, it detracts from it.

‘Because we don’t control our own borders, and because the EU prevents us from doing so, this puts people in Britain at risk of suffering real crimes, whether it is murder, rape or other criminal harm.’

But pro-EU campaigner­s said the Leave camp’s argument was confused. They insisted leaving the EU would damage co-operation between countries on crime. Former Home Office minister Damian Green said: ‘Once again the Leave campaign’s argument makes no sense, it is a mix of chaos and confusion.

‘The key alternativ­es they offer to our EU membership involve accepting the principle of free movement, including both Norway and Switzerlan­d. The truth is the UK already has the best of both worlds.

‘We maintain all the benefits of EU membership whilst opting out of the passport-free Schengen area and maintainin­g our border at Calais rather than at Dover.

‘We are able to stop suspects from travelling to the UK and since 2010 we have refused entry to almost 6,000 EEA [European Economic Area] nationals … Inside Europe we work with our partners to tackle violent crime, and through Europol we protect UK citizens and bring criminals to justice.

‘Leaving the EU would be a leap into the dark and would put this vital co-operation at risk.’

Although the EU demands that the right to free movement is upheld, it does not compel member states to share informatio­n on known criminals – except in the most extreme circumstan­ces.

Some countries such as France and Germany do flag up potentiall­y dangerous people to the UK, but many other countries – including most of the Eastern European states that joined in 2004 – do not. The report notes that many other EU countries do not have Britain’s system of supervisio­n requiremen­ts for serious criminals.

EU rules also mean someone can be excluded from the UK only if they pose ‘a genuine, present and sufficient­ly serious threat’. By contrast, non-EU nationals can be required to produce an official clean criminal record certificat­e.

The Remain camp argues that criminals could still cross the border even if we outside the EU.

They also point to the European Arrest Warrant, which allows Britain to get hold of criminals who have fled to the Continent.

A Scottish Government spokesman said: ‘Membership of the European Union allows us to cooperate on policing issues with other member states much more easily.’

‘Puts people in Britain at risk’

AS Brexit campaigner­s release a dossier of 50 dangerous criminals allowed into Britain – some of whom went on to commit heinous crimes in Scotland – under EU rules, Europhiles have been quick to accuse them of scaremonge­ring.

But these are not the myths peddled by some in the Remain camp, who float lurid fantasies of the worst that could happen if Britain pulls out.

Indeed, these are all-too-real cases of convicted murderers, rapists, child sex offenders and serial thieves who have walked into this country unhindered – 45 of them striking again while here.

They include such monsters as Arnis Zalkalns, the Latvian who murdered his wife before moving to Britain and killing 14-year-old Alice Gross.

For her and many others, the worst has already happened under the EU free movement rules that prevent us from demanding proper checks.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom