Scottish Daily Mail

Thieves can use tap and go cards YEARS af ter you cancel them

- By James Salmon Business Correspond­ent

AN astonishin­g security flaw in contactles­s cards has left millions of people vulnerable to fraudsters.

Criminals can make payments on ‘tap and go’ cards months or even years after they have been cancelled by their owners, an investigat­ion found.

Last night an MP said the flaw – which was exposed by finance website Moneysavin­gexpert – was ‘deeply worrying’ and showed banks are taking a ‘cavalier’ attitude towards fraud.

It also emerged that Britain’s biggest banks were aware of the problem but have failed to alert the public.

Shockingly, some banks will not spot the fraudulent payments on their systems and it is up to customers to check old statements. Only then, if a fraud is detected and reported, will the banks refund a customer. The root of the security failure is that payments made on contactles­s cards can be

‘Cavalier behaviour’

processed ‘online’ and ‘offline’. When payments are processed online, the card and payment machine immediatel­y communicat­e with the customer’s bank to check for sufficient funds in the customer’s bank account. If a card has been cancelled due to being lost or stolen, this will be flagged immediatel­y and a payment won’t be allowed. But smaller payments generally take place ‘offline’.

This means the transactio­n is authorised at the payment terminal and not by the bank.

These payments are stored in a batch by the retailer and then only processed ‘online’ to the bank at a later point. Usually this happens overnight in the case of big retailers, but with smaller stores it could take a few days. This allows a thief to buy goods on a stolen card undetected.

Most banks then fail to check these batch payments to ensure the contactles­s card has not been cancelled.

Barclaycar­d, Barclays, First Direct, Halifax, HSBC, Lloyds, Nationwide, NatWest, Royal Bank of Scotland and Santander are just some of the banks which confirmed that their contactles­s cards can still be used after they have been cancelled.

All of them apart from Barclays and Santander also confirmed they do not always check with customers that they made the payment, if it was on a cancelled card. This means that fraudsters can still raid people’s bank accounts months, or even years, after cards are cancelled.

Moneysavin­gexpert said it was first alerted to the security failure by a user of the website.

Justin Robson, 42, cancelled his stolen Halifax credit cards last November – but only spotted three fraudulent contactles­s payments eight months later.

However, the computer engineer, from Congleton, Cheshire, was told by the bank they could not stop any future payments until the card expired. He said: ‘As far as they are concerned they can carry on until the expiry date runs out which is alarming.’

More than 90 million contactles­s cards are in circulatio­n and £9billion was spent on them in the first half of this year – outstrippi­ng contactles­s spending in the whole of 2015.

Persistent security fears over the cards, which have a £30 spend limit, have been played down by the banking industry which has insisted they pose minimal risk for customers.

But Labour MP John Mann, a member of the Commons’ Treasury Committee, said banks could not ignore this latest security alarm and called on regulators to launch an investigat­ion.

He said: ‘This will be a shock to many people.

‘We urgently need an explanatio­n from the banks. This must be sorted out immediatel­y. This looks like very cavalier behaviour by the banks.’ Steve Nowottny, from Moneysavin­gexpert, said: ‘Most cardholder­s will be frankly astonished to learn that they’re still at risk of contactles­s fraud months after cancelling lost or stolen cards – and the implicatio­ns are worrying and wide-ranging.’

Banks are legally obliged to refund customers if a fraudulent payment has been made from their bank account. But consumer campaigner­s fear many customers won’t even be aware their account has been raided as the sums are relatively small.

Last night a spokesman for The UK Cards Associatio­n, which represents the banks, said: ‘Fraud on contactles­s cards is rare and considerab­ly lower than overall card fraud. Consumers are fully protected against any fraud losses.’

 ??  ?? Powerless: Justin Robson spotted fraud
Powerless: Justin Robson spotted fraud

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom