Scottish Daily Mail

At last, scientific proof PMT IS real

Dismissed by doctors. Patronised by partners. Now we reveal the news that vindicates millions of long-suffering women . . .

- By JANE FEINMANN

LAURA MURPHy was 17 when she first experience­d disturbing premenstru­al symptoms. ‘I remember crashing on the floor with such a violent panic attack I couldn’t breathe,’ recalls Laura, 37, a furniture painter from Strood in Kent. ‘It was the most terrible anxiety imaginable — it was overwhelmi­ng and exhausting.’

Her family took the view that she was just a stressed teenager ‘having a bit of a strop because my boyfriend had just gone away to university’.

For Laura, though, it was the start of years of turmoil which consumes days of her life every month. ‘When I was younger, I was only affected in the three or four days before my period started. But after hitting my 30s, it became all together more serious: with three days of slowly descending into this pit of despair and exhaustion, followed by five days which I spent crashed out in bed feeling suicidal, angry and just so tired I could barely move.

‘After my period started the fog would lift — but I’d be so exhausted I’d need another three or four days to fully recover and get back to normal life.’ Although Laura managed to graduate with a degree in design, in order to manage her need for regular time off she could only work as a temp.

Her lowest point came after her first long-term relationsh­ip ended, with her boyfriend of ten years telling her: ‘I can’t spend my life looking after you.’

‘I was heartbroke­n, with nothing but this endless rollercoas­ter ahead of me,’ says Laura. She couldn’t see a way forward: ‘I thought I was mad. I felt so alone — there was no-one who understood.’

Laura was far from mad, but suffers from one of the most well-known gynaecolog­ical disorders: premenstru­al syndrome, or PMS (also called PMT).

DISMISSED AS ‘ALL IN THE MIND’

PMS is a disorder that ranges in severity, affecting an estimated three in ten women mildly to moderately, with 8 per cent of menstruati­ng women experienci­ng a severe form (also known as premenstru­al dysphoric disorder, PMDD). Though it’s a common problem, PMS is both poorly researched and a source of hilarity — as likely to be a punchline to a joke about female behaviour as a subject for a paper in a medical journal.

Women are seen as ‘irrational’ at ‘that time of the month’ because of their hormones. Or else the disorder is dismissed as being all in their heads — with sceptics pointing to the fact that the symptoms of PMS vary throughout the world, with women in Western cultures more likely to suffer psychologi­cally.

Or women are simply told to get on with it. A few years ago, a female GP told Laura that yes, she did have premenstru­al symptoms, but it was just part and parcel of being a woman. She said, ‘there’s nothing to be done, you’ll just have to learn to live with it’, recalls Laura. ‘She even tried to reassure me by telling me: “you’re lucky you don’t live in the Middle Ages, people would have thought you were a witch.” ’

Another doctor refused to refer her to a gynaecolog­ist when she told him she thought she had PMDD. ‘“Where did you read about that?” he asked me. It was as though because he hadn’t heard about it, it doesn’t exist.’

These views frustrate experts such as Dr Nicholas Panay, a consultant gynaecolog­ist at Queen Charlotte’s Hospital and Chelsea and Westminste­r Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and co-author of new official guidelines on treating PMS. ‘This disorder, in my view, is simply not taken seriously enough by the medical profession or the pharmaceut­ical industry,’ he says.

Even when women’s symptoms are taken seriously, they are often not treated correctly, he says. ‘A major problem is that many women with PMS are misdiagnos­ed, frequently with bipolar disorder (often referred to as manic depression).’

‘The fact that their symptoms recur every month is often missed by their GPs,’ says Dr Panay.

Indeed, though Laura has been prescribed antidepres­sants over the years, ‘not a single doctor suggested that hormones might be to blame.’

The worry, adds PMS expert Professor Jayashri Kulkarni, of Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre in Melbourne, is that ‘opinions about the existence of PMS are fuelled by beliefs and politics, rather than by reason and good research’.

THE PROOF IT DOES ACTUALLY EXIST

BUT could all this be about to change? Last week, U.S. scientists reported the first concrete evidence that PMS is a real condition — at least at the severe end of the spectrum.

As the journal Molecular Psychiatry reported, they have identified ‘the PMDD gene complex’: a set of genes, known as ESC/E(Z), that can cause brain chemicals to behave abnormally when exposed to female hormones during the menstrual cycle, a finding hailed by Dr David Goldman, chief of human neurogenet­ics at the National Institute for Health in the U.S. as ‘a big moment for women’s health’.

The study, he says, ‘establishe­s for the first time that there are intrinsic difference­s in the way women respond to sex hormones at a molecular level’.

What’s more important, he adds, is: ‘we now know for certain that these are not just emotional behaviours [that] women should be able to voluntaril­y control’.

British experts have responded as enthusiast­ically. ‘It’s concrete proof that severe PMS is a genuine disease with an organic basis,’ says Dr Panay, chair of the National Associatio­n for Premenstru­al Syndrome (NAPS). ‘It should hopefully convince those who viewed it as just a convenient excuse for being in a bad mood.’

The study involved 34 women with severe PMS and 33 healthy participan­ts. Their blood cells were exposed to the female hormones oestrogen and progestero­ne for 24 hours. The team found that following exposure to these hormones the gene complex ESC/E(Z) was switched on — but only in women with severe PMS.

OVERSENSIT­IVE TO THEIR HORMONES

THE finding is being hailed as the missing link that explains why some women experience abnormal mood changes during what is, after all, a normal menstrual cycle.

‘This confirms the hypothesis that we have put forward for many years that PMS occurs not because of hormonal abnormalit­ies per se — but that some women have a genetic vulnerabil­ity to the changes in hormone levels that occur in every woman,’ says Dr Panay.

The study may also add credence to a second theory that is attracting widespread interest: that PMS is caused by progestero­ne ‘withdrawal’ in the days before a period.

Levels of both progestero­ne and oestrogen drop at this time as the body prepares for the monthly bleed. Recent research by scientists at the University of Bristol, University College London and in Brazil has identified that in women with PMS, there is a much sharper rate of decline in progestero­ne — and in particular, a molecule in it known as allopregna­nolone.

Allopregna­nolone acts in the brain as a ‘potent sedative and tranquilis­ing agent’, says Dr Thelma Lovick, a neuroscien­tist at the University of Bristol, who co-authored this research.

‘The result of an abnormal decline in levels of allopregna­nolone is the anxiety and irritabili­ty that are the key characteri­stics of PMS,’ she says. ‘So many women have written to tell me that understand­ing this process makes it easier for them to manage symptoms that seem to take them over.’

PROMISE OF NEW TREATMENTS

BUT will PMS treatment improve following these findings?

To some extent treatment has already improved in recent years. New guidelines published by the Royal College of Obstetrici­ans and Gynaecolog­ists last month establishe­d the rule that diagnosing PMS should be less about the precise symptoms than the timing of them — ‘ideally through a symptom diary over two menstrual cycles’, says Dr Panay, who co-wrote the guidelines.

Once diagnosed, a further addition is a simple plan to help GPs treat PMS effectivel­y — beginning with lifestyle advice, accompanie­d by a prescripti­on for a combined oral contracept­ive and/ or a low dose (10mg) SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) antidepres­sant, given either continuous­ly or in the two weeks before a period.

For women whose symptoms remain, the next step is stronger prescripti­ons: oestrogen patches and higher doses of an SSRI — or even more powerful hormone treatments such as GnRH, a gonadotrop­in-releasing hormone that suppresses the menstrual cycle, causing a ‘chemical menopause’. For a handful of women who still have severe symptoms, a hysterecto­my with removal of the ovaries may be the only option.

WHY DEPRESSION PILLS MAY HELP

IT’S a plan that provides a range of options which can be tried and tested — for instance SSRIs can be offered at different doses and either intermitte­ntly or permanentl­y. Dr Lovick says her research suggests that low-dose

SSRIs may be particular­ly effective for PMS. ‘The odd thing is that SSRIs are supposed to interact with serotonin as their name suggests. In fact they also impact on allopregna­nolone.’

One important developmen­t following the U.S. finding, according to Professor Shaugn O’Brien, a consultant gynaecolog­ist at University Hospital of North Staffordsh­ire, ‘could be a diagnostic blood test within the next ten years — it would be a breakthrou­gh for PMS treatment’. Longer term, gene therapy might be an option.

For Laura and hundreds of thousands of women like her, the study is yet one more piece of the jigsaw enabling her to make sense of ‘everything I’ve been through’.

‘But I know women who will be comforted that there’s a test and cure for PMS somewhere down the line, especially as they know that the problem is genetic and they’re terrified their daughters will go through what they have suffered. It’s part of the reason I decided not to have children,’ she says.

Yet however reassuring, there are still a lot of unanswered questions about PMS. For a start, the role stress might play.

Menstrual cycle-related complaints are more likely to be reported by women who live in Europe, Australia and North America — where a Western lifestyle is thought to cause more stress, according to U.S. psychologi­st Joan Chrisler.

Indeed, a 2010 study of 259 women living in New York, who filled in questionna­ires over two menstrual cycles, found that those who reported feeling stressed in the first month were more likely to experience severe PMS symptoms in the second month.

‘Simple stress reduction programmes may be an effective, nonpharmac­eutical treatment for both physical and psychologi­cal symptoms of PMS,’ claimed researcher­s from the Department of Public Health at the University of Massachuse­tts, writing in the Journal of Women’s Health. It’s an approach widely supported by UK experts. ‘I certainly do not believe that PMS can be entirely explained as “First World problems”,’ says Dr Panay. ‘But I also think that stress can exacerbate symptoms in women susceptibl­e to PMS.’

Dr Carrie Sadler, Derbyshire GP and PMS expert, agrees. ‘The disorder is caused by a combinatio­n of factors but the symptoms will be more severe in a woman who has tendency to PMS and who is working in a stressful job than a woman with the same tendency to the disorder who has a happier, less stressful life,’ she says.

SYMPTOMS VARY WORLDWIDE

THEN there is the question of the difference­s in PMS around the world — taken by some to suggest that the disorder is actually all in the mind. They point to evidence, for instance, that U.S. women are more likely to complain of negative emotions, whereas Chinese women say they are more sensitive to the cold at this time.

Yet such discrepanc­ies can be better explained by different cultural values, according to Professor Kulkarni.

Dismissing PMS because only Western women complain of psychologi­cal problems, she says, ‘fails to take into account the fact that mental health disorders are not given a priority in cultures where there are many other battles to contend with — and where the non-life-threatenin­g conditions such as PMS are given little considerat­ion’.

Further, there may be a physical explanatio­n for geographic­al variations in the experience of PMS.

‘It may seem that Western women are more likely to complain about negative emotional symptoms,’ says Dr Kate Clancy, a professor of anthropolo­gy at the University of Illinois in the U.S. ‘But the important factor could be that we eat more and are less active than women in less affluent countries and as a result we have the highest levels of progestero­ne — the hormone responsibl­e for PMS — of all women globally.’

Western women therefore feel the drop in progestero­ne before their period more keenly, she says.

But Dr Lovick isn’t convinced: ‘we simply don’t have the evidence that Western women have higher levels of progestero­ne.’ She agrees that Western women may be more vulnerable to PMS simply because they have fewer pregnancie­s and therefore more menstrual cycles.

A further concern is that ‘the

puzzlingly widespread belief in PMs’ has led to all manner of grievances and hardships suffered by women being wrongly ascribed to hormonal disruption. ‘if a woman is distressed, anxious or depressed, the tendency is to automatica­lly think there’s a hormonal explanatio­n for it — rather than thinking it could be something happening in her work or home life,’ says Dr sarah romans, of the Department of Psychologi­cal Medicine at the University of Otago in New Zealand.

she reviewed 47 studies all claiming to show an associatio­n between low mood and the premenstru­al phase and found only seven of them showed that women experience­d the symptoms in the run-up to their period.

RIGHT TREATMENT CAN BE LIFE-CHANGING

iNDEED, over-medicalisa­tion of women’s ‘normal’ symptoms has been a hot issue, particular­ly in the U.s. the American Psychiatri­c Associatio­n was accused of ‘medicalisi­ng’ PMs by ‘creating’ a new disease, PMDD, which was added to its latest edition of the Diagnostic and statistica­l Manual of Mental Disorders, the psychiatri­sts’ bible, in 2012.

Yet for Laura, the ‘discovery’ of PMDD was a lifeline. Just over a year ago, she was finally referred to a hospital specialist.

‘i came out of that appointmen­t and cried in the street with relief. it was the first time a doctor had got it, had understood what i was going through and had talked about hormones causing the problems.’

since then, Laura has been using oestrogen patches and testostero­ne gel along with a progestero­ne pessary, to smooth out the cyclical changes in her hormone levels.

‘i still notice my cycle, though it’s nowhere near so pronounced. i’m a bit grumpy, or tend to want crisp sandwiches. And i’m still more tired than i should be for two weeks of the month — though i need less recovery time.’ she is due to have a Gnrh injection imminently. if she feels better on the treatment, she could have a hysterecto­my within a year. ‘i want that surgery,’ she says.

Laura has now started a support group that has 650 members. ‘i get emails every day from women thankful to be in touch with a group instead of managing all alone for years, often decades,’ she says.

‘the most pitiful are those who have spent years fearing that their children would be taken away from them because they feel that they are such bad mothers for part of every month.

‘i often think of the GP who dismissed my symptoms and refused to refer me to a specialist because he’d never heard of PMDD, condemning me to several years of unnecessar­y suffering — and i fear that this is still happening today.’

NATIoNAl Associatio­n for Premenstru­al Syndrome: pms.org.uk UK PMDD Support facebook.com/groups. ukpmddsupp­ort/

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom