THE world’s deadliest diamond!

Eyeballs gouged out, limbs ripped off, men tortured with molten lead — all because of the curse of the Koh-i-Noor. Is it any wonder the Queen chooses never to wear...

BY 500BC in Asia, diamonds were fashioned into rings — ‘gods were supposed to dwell in a particle of diamond’ — and in the Indian royal courts, jewellery rather than clothing was the principal form of adornment. Princes and their concubines were covered in ‘a fabulous profusion of jewelled ornaments’ as a conspicuous display of power.

Dalrymple and Anand first find a mention of the Koh-i-noor in 1547. It next turns up in the despatch of a British ambassador in 1616, who described the Mughal emperors as ‘laden with diamonds, rubies, pearls’.

Shah Jahan, builder of the Taj Mahal, acquired the jewel in 1656, and believed it made him ‘a sun king, almost a sun god’.

At the Red Fort in Agra he commissioned the Peacock Throne, ‘designed to resemble and evoke the fabled throne of Solomon’, which had a canopy studded with gems and held aloft on a column of emeralds. The Koh-inoor was set in the peacock’s crown and was guarded by eunuchs.

Jahan was imprisoned by his sons and died in captivity. his successors were variously murdered — one of them was first blinded with a hot needle, the father of another ruler was ‘forced off a precipice on his elephant’ and wives and mothers were strangled.

Delhi was then invaded by Persians and, in 1739, the populace put to the sword. ‘It seemed as if it were raining blood, for the drains were streaming with it,’ ran a report.

nader Shah, the scourge of the Ottoman Empire, transported the Mughal treasury to Tehran in a caravan consisting of 700 elephants, 4,000 camels and 12,000 horses. he’d received the Koh-i-noor from the defeated Mughal emperor, Mohammud Shah, who wore it in his turban.

nader Shah was the kind of despot who

Coronation gem: The Queen Mother wearing the Koh-i-Noor (circled) in 1937, with Princess Elizabeth

had his son blinded ‘and his eyes brought to him on a platter’. When he was assassinated, the Koh-i-Noor was spirited away to Kandahar. Nader Shah’s grandson had molten lead poured over his head to try to force revelation of its whereabouts.

The jewel next appeared in the possession of Ahmad Shah, who had a gangrenous ulcer on his face that ravaged his brain.

‘By 1772, maggots were dropping from the upper part of Ahmad Shah’s rotten nose into his mouth and food as he ate.’ He ingeniously hid the Koh-i-Noor from his enemies in a crack in the wall.

Examining poems, illuminated manuscripts and sculpted friezes, Dalrymple and Anand next spot the jewel on a bracelet in Kabul. Was it taken there by an Afghan bodyguard or a harem attendant? New owner Maharaja Ranjit Singh ‘loved the Koh-i-Noor with a rare passion and wore it on all public occasions’.

By this stage, the British were establishing themselves in India. When Ranjit died, English diplomats were appalled to have to witness the ‘abominable ceremony’ of suttee, in which his wives, ‘devoted to their husband in life and beyond’, were compelled to incinerate themselves on his cremation pyre.

As the cruelties mount up — dismembering troublesome relatives and leaving them to bleed to death; protracted poisonings; so-called accidents with ‘a doublebarrelled fowling-piece’; the plundering of people’s property — it is evident that the Koh-i-Noor was, quite simply, a spoil of war.

In fact, the jewel never peaceably changed hands. Within a few years of Ranjit’s death in 1839, three Maharajas who hoped to possess it were murdered.

Ten years later, on the British conquest of the Punjab, the Koh-iNoor, as ‘the single most valuable object in India’, was handed to the Earl of Dalhousie, representing Queen Victoria. It was transported to England — though an outbreak of cholera on the ship put the vessel in danger of being forcibly sunk for quarantine purposes.

ONcE safely in England, it was the star item at the Great Exhibition in 1851. But the diamond was deemed disappointingly dull, so it was cut and polished by Garrard, the crown jewellers — a process in which it lost 42 per cent of its original weight.

Queen Victoria wore it on a sash during a visit to Paris, ‘wordlessly conveying a sense of the power and reach of the British monarch’.

Today, as ‘a sort of historical emblem of conquest in India’, the presence of the diamond in London is contentious. India, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan and even the Taliban have asked for its return, and it is now a ‘diplomatic grenade’.

When, however, James callaghan was pestered by the prime minister of Pakistan in 1976, it is his response which remains masterly: ‘In the light of the confused past history of the Koh-i-Noor diamond, the clear British title to it [in the 1849 peace treaty with the Maharaja of Lahore, which concluded the Second Anglo-Sikh War], and the multiplicity of claims which would undoubtedly be made to it if its future were ever thought to be in doubt, I could not advise Her Majesty that it should be surrendered to any other country.’

In light of its poisoned chalice status, the Queen, we note, ‘is taking no chances’ and has never personally worn the Koh-i-Noor.