Scottish Daily Mail

NHS TAINTED BLOOD SHAME

Secret files reveal health bosses knew for FIVE YEARS patients were being infected They cynically planned to use victims as guinea pigs to find cure for hepatitis

- By Ben Spencer, Richard Marsden and Xantha Leatham

PATIENTS were given deadly contaminat­ed blood for at least five years after health officials became aware of the danger, damning documents reveal.

Newly unearthed minutes of meetings held in 1980 and 1981 show that officials consciousl­y put patients at risk during a scandal which killed 2,000 people.

Scientists were so sure the blood was dangerous, they even planned to use victims as guinea pigs to develop a new test for hepatitis, say the papers, which are likely to play a central role in a major civil action to be lodged at the High Court today, in which 300 families of victims are suing the Government.

the minutes show officials knew at least 50 patients a year were becoming infected with hepatitis. Despite this, the supply of contaminat­ed blood was not stopped until 1986.

the contaminat­ed blood scandal of the 1970s and 1980s centred on the use of clotting agents for patients with haemophili­a.

they were given a product called Factor VIII, which was extracted from donors’ blood. the

NHS was low on supplies, so Factor VIII was imported from the US, where it was often taken from high-risk groups including drug addicts, prostitute­s and prisoners who had donated their blood for cash.

An estimated 7,500 people contracted hepatitis as a result, and many were also infected with HIV. Up to 2,000 died and others were left with severe health problems.

Two years ago, a report found that almost 3,000 people, including children, were infected with hepatitis C in Scotland, while 78 contracted HIV after being given infected blood and blood products by the NHS in the 1970s and 1980s.

The Penrose Inquiry, set up by the Scottish Government to investigat­e blood contaminat­ion, concluded in 2015 that more should have been done to screen blood.

Health Secretary Shona Robison called the scandal ‘one of the greatest healthcare-related tragedies ever in this country’.

From 1990, the Daily Mail highlighte­d the plight of haemophili­acs infected, campaignin­g for them to receive compensati­on.

The scandal first came to light in the mid1980s, when fears over the Aids epidemic in the US highlighte­d the dangers of contaminat­ed blood transfusio­ns. But the new documents, unearthed by the son of one of the victims, reveal scientists were aware of the problems well before this.

At an internatio­nal haematolog­y symposium in Glasgow in September 1980, experts were already predicting problems.

Dr Howard Thomas, a liver expert, told the meeting: ‘It is in ten years’ time that we shall see the problems. Bearing in mind the proportion of the patients infected, or who have persistent abnormal liver function tests – from 60 to 80 per cent – it will be an enormous problem when it happens.’

Dr John Craske, a leading virologist, told the meeting: ‘There is a high risk from the use of Factor VIII or IX concentrat­e that the patients will contract non-A, non-B hepatitis [hepatitis C], and a 20-30 per cent chance of resultant chronic hepatitis.’

Nine months later, in June 1981, the Government’s blood transfusio­n research committee met in London. The meeting was attended by Dr Diana Walford, a senior official at the then Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS), who later became the Government’s deputy chief medical officer. Officials were told cases of hepatitis were being seen among patients treated with clotting products.

‘Approximat­ely 40-50 cases were reported per year out of a total of just over 2,000 patients treated with Factor VIII, IX concentrat­e or cryoprecip­itate,’ the minutes report.

The officials were so convinced patients given these products would be infected by what would soon be known as hepatitis C, they proposed using them as trial subjects to develop a blood test.

The minutes say: ‘The DHSS were keen that a prospectiv­e study of patients undergoing elective treatment requiring concentrat­e should be undertaken.’

Dr Walford, 73, refused to discuss her recollecti­ons of the meeting, saying: ‘I will not be drawn into discussing it.’

In 2010 and 2011, she twice refused to give evidence to the Penrose Inquiry, saying ‘the passage of time’ meant she was ‘not in a position to assist the inquiry’.

The attitude of officials is further exposed by the claims of a senior government medical adviser, who told the Daily Mail he repeatedly warned the DHSS about contaminat­ed blood products. The risk, he told officials, lay in the fact each injection had blood plasma from up to 3,000 people, some of whom would carry infections.

The new evidence was found by Jason Evans, 27, whose father Jonathan died in 1993 with HIV and hepatitis C. The marketing consultant from Coventry spent 12 months gathering thousands of documents via Freedom of Informatio­n requests and from the National Archives.

Mr Evans said: ‘There has long been concern that there was the use of “human guinea pigs”. This is the first time we have evidence that says it in black and white.’

The Department of Health said: ‘This Government is continuing to work closely with those affected by infected blood while investing record support.

‘We took steps to protect patients according to the best informatio­n then available.’

Comment – Page 16

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom