Scottish Daily Mail

Heath ‘victim’ is abuser who faked murder confession

- By Rebecca Camber and Rosie Waterhouse

Sir Edward Heath’s main accuser is a jailed paedophile with mental health problems who has falsely confessed to murder.

His bombshell claim that as an 11year-old boy he was raped by Sir Edward led to a £1.5million inquiry into paedophile allegation­s against the former prime minister.

Yesterday, after it emerged that the accuser was a habitual liar and ‘predatory sex offender’, Mike Veale, the police chief in charge of the two-year inquiry, was accused of misleading the public.

Wiltshire Police last week revealed that the rape claim was the most serious of seven sexual abuse allegation­s considered so credible that police would have interviewe­d the former Conservati­ve leader had he still been alive.

The force’s Operation Conifer report, which the Wiltshire Police chief constable defended last Thursday, concluded that there was ‘no underminin­g evidence’ in relation to the rape claim, unlike many of the other allegation­s against Sir Edward which police investigat­ed.

But now it has emerged that the man is a convicted sex offender who has previously falsely confessed to a murder. The criminal, who is in jail for sexually assaulting a teenage boy, was on remand when he told Wiltshire Police in 2015 that Sir Edward picked him up while he was hitchhikin­g on the A2 and raped him in a flat in Mayfair in 1961.

Despite the seriousnes­s of his allegation­s to Wiltshire Police, the complainan­t, who has anonymity under the law, declared earlier this year: ‘i do not believe for one minute that Ted Heath was a paedophile.’

When he first made his allegation­s to the Metropolit­an Police in 2015, child abuse detectives dropped their investigat­ion within three months after concluding that ‘there were no lines of inquiry that could proportion­ately be pursued’.

But he then went to Wiltshire Police. The Daily Mail has learnt that he is writing a book behind bars detailing his allegation­s about Sir Edward, who died in 2005 aged 89, and has spent two years doing ‘research’.

The complainan­t, who once worked at a children’s home, has been banned from having contact with children for the rest of his life because of his appalling history of sex attacks on youngsters. Described by a judge as ‘predatory sex offender’, he has multiple conviction­s for grooming and indecently assaulting boys, child pornograph­y and gross indecency dating back four decades.

More than a decade ago he falsely confessed to a murder. On several occasions, he has gone on the run and once led police on a 100mph motorway chase. He is known to have mental health problems and has received psychiatri­c help. Yet last week Wiltshire Police presented his evidence as credible.

The claim was one of nine allegation­s about the Tory MP – eight of which proved to be groundless – that the force received before it controvers­ially launched an appeal for victims outside Sir Edward’s home in August 2015.

Last week during a packed press conference Mr Veale said he did not know if any of those seven complainan­ts were criminals, but added: ‘Some of the victims are challenged.’

Sir Edward’s friends and former colleagues have called for a judge-led inquiry to evaluate his guilt or innocence and have dismissed the investigat­ion as a whitewash with no corroborat­ing evidence.

Yesterday Sir Edward’s godson Lincoln Seligman said: ‘This

‘Led police on 100mph chase’

accuser was known to be a liar, a paedophile and had falsely confessed to a murder. Yet his accusation is the main plank of the chief constable’s list of allegation­s.

‘i understand that the rape allegation had, after investigat­ion, been dismissed by the Met. How can Mr Veale say that this evidence is not grossly undermined. it beggars belief.’

Last night Wiltshire Police said: ‘We will not be drawn on any further operationa­l detail, as to do so would potentiall­y place victim anonymity at risk.’

The spokesman added that since August 2015 the force had been in charge of investigat­ing all allegation­s against Sir Edward, and had ‘reviewed any activity that has been undertaken by any other force’ relating to Sir Edward before this.

 ??  ?? Child abuse claims: Sir Edward Heath in the 1960s
Child abuse claims: Sir Edward Heath in the 1960s

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom